[7467] in Release_7.7_team
Re: [release-team] Should we meet tomorrow?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Geoffrey Thomas)
Thu Apr 21 16:48:33 2011
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:48:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Geoffrey Thomas <geofft@MIT.EDU>
To: Jonathan Reed <jdreed@mit.edu>
cc: "release-team@mit.edu Team" <release-team@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <03D5A746-5119-4030-80FD-25B6A502F0F4@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1104211645580.2279@lunatique.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
I can plan to deal with the things with my name next to them during the
time we would be meeting :-)
--
Geoffrey Thomas
geofft@mit.edu
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Jonathan Reed wrote:
> We are scheduled to meet tomorrow, however I don't have a lot on the agenda other than a Trac review. Unless anyone feels strongly, I propose we cancel this week's meeting, check-in over e-mail on the issues listed below, and re-convene next Friday, April 29, at 2pm in N42-203.
>
> What do people think?
>
> -Jon
>
>
>
> Check-in required:
>
> geofft, lizdenys: dkms (#243)
>
> geofft: upgrade-schroots (#834)
>
> geofft,lizdenys: natty rebuild
>
> Trac #567: This doomed us with the latest gdm-config patch. I see a couple of suggestions in the comments, but nothing concrete. Can we move forward with a kludge, or are we dependent on upstream? And if we move forward, can we deploy code in a stub somewhere and source it elsewhere, to make changes easier?
>
> Trac #698: This requires a corrupted profile for testing. I can't reproduce anymore using the description Quentin provided.
>
>
>
