[5631] in Release_7.7_team
Re: Potentially removing olc from the release?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathan D Reed)
Tue Oct 17 15:26:56 2006
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 15:26:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jonathan D Reed <jdreed@MIT.EDU>
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
cc: release-team@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <1161109762.3041.14.camel@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62L.0610171517450.20146@infinite-loop.mit.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Score: 1.217
X-Spam-Level: * (1.217)
X-Spam-Flag: NO
A December release would be fine. Our "deadline" is basically the start
of IAP, but that can be flexible.
-Jon
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 16:51 -0400, Jonathan D Reed wrote:
>> I think that covers any potential problems from this transition. Does
>> this proposal sound ok? What would be the timeframe for turning the olc
>> client programs into attachandrun scripts? I can have the olc locker
>> populated shortly.
>
> It would require pushing out a patch release. Since we don't currently
> have any driving motivations for a patch release before December, it's
> more a question of when OLC wants this done by.
>
>
>
