[5630] in Release_7.7_team
Re: Potentially removing olc from the release?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Hudson)
Tue Oct 17 14:29:19 2006
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
To: Jonathan D Reed <jdreed@mit.edu>
Cc: release-team@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62L.0610161638001.30738@infinite-loop.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:29:22 -0400
Message-Id: <1161109762.3041.14.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 1.217
X-Spam-Level: * (1.217)
X-Spam-Flag: NO
On Mon, 2006-10-16 at 16:51 -0400, Jonathan D Reed wrote:
> I think that covers any potential problems from this transition. Does
> this proposal sound ok? What would be the timeframe for turning the olc
> client programs into attachandrun scripts? I can have the olc locker
> populated shortly.
It would require pushing out a patch release. Since we don't currently
have any driving motivations for a patch release before December, it's
more a question of when OLC wants this done by.
