[3647] in Release_7.7_team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Next question from Ji-yong Wang

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Hudson)
Fri Dec 20 19:01:23 2002

From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
To: Bill Cattey <wdc@mit.edu>
Cc: release-team@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <1040419644.1438.21.camel@tokata.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 20 Dec 2002 19:01:18 -0500
Message-Id: <1040428878.10241.14.camel@error-messages.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0

On Fri, 2002-12-20 at 16:27, Bill Cattey wrote:
> So first off, I guess our space analysis code for updates isn't working
> well enough.

Is there any reason to believe it's not functioning exactly as intended?

> Do others see more advice I can give?  Is it possible/safe to back out
> of 9.1 and then to offer packages to add to get the stated ssh need met?

3.4GB should be enough space to run 9.1 if enough local data can be
cleared off.

We don't have any packages for ssh2 on 9.0, and I don't think we want to
start supporting that either.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post