[3550] in Release_7.7_team
Re: Mozilla 1.0.1, 1.1, etc.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert A Basch)
Thu Oct 3 18:32:40 2002
Message-Id: <200210032232.SAA31357@abulia.mit.edu>
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
cc: "t. belton" <tbelton@MIT.EDU>, release-team@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "03 Oct 2002 17:17:34 EDT."
<1033679854.3595.22.camel@error-messages.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 18:32:37 -0400
From: Robert A Basch <rbasch@MIT.EDU>
> Going to 1.1 on both platforms seems reasonable. (It does mean leaving
> the SGI more behind, but that shouldn't be a show-stopper.)
As I mentioned to Todd offline, I recall seeing a warning from mozilla
that sharing a profile between different versions can cause corruption.
I don't know if this would apply to 1.0 vs. 1.1, but it is something
that should be investigated before we commit to running different
versions on different platforms. (If it turns out that this is not a
problem, I agree that it makes sense to go with 1.1, leaving SGI behind
if necessary).
Bob
