[3549] in Release_7.7_team
Re: Mozilla 1.0.1, 1.1, etc.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Cattey)
Thu Oct 3 18:06:44 2002
From: Bill Cattey <wdc@MIT.EDU>
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu>
Cc: "t. belton" <tbelton@mit.edu>, release-team@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <1033679854.3595.22.camel@error-messages.mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 03 Oct 2002 18:06:41 -0400
Message-Id: <1033682801.1139.5.camel@tokata.mit.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
My political crystal ball says, "If we can document how Mozilla says 1.1
is the stable patch release now, AND we can document a specific customer
who benefits from a 1.1 feature lacking in 1.0.1 then we're in a
stronger position to advocate patching up to 1.1.
I note that the SGI version of 1.1 was, for a while, available as a
weekly build.
I'll inquire to Sun about why there's no 1.0.1 for completeness sake.
-wdc
On Thu, 2002-10-03 at 17:17, Greg Hudson wrote:
> Going to 1.1 on both platforms seems reasonable. (It does mean leaving
> the SGI more behind, but that shouldn't be a show-stopper.)
>
