[3000] in Release_7.7_team

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Athena Release Team Monthly Status Report

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Cattey)
Wed Oct 3 22:45:52 2001

Message-ID: <8viwpQJz000105QpVA@mit.edu>
Date: Thu,  4 Oct 2001 02:45:48 +0000 ()
From: Bill Cattey <wdc@MIT.EDU>
To: release-team@MIT.EDU, owls@MIT.EDU, delivery-council@MIT.EDU, ops@MIT.EDU

Team Name: Athena UNIX Platform Development                    
 Team Leader: Bill Cattey                    
 Report Date: 10/3/01
                    
 Submitted by: Bill Cattey
                    
 Team URL: 		http://web.mit.edu/teamhtml/Athena/
 Release URL:	http://web.mit.edu/release/www/
                    
 Accomplishments past period:
    *Patch release with:
        Solaris Patches requested by customers.
        Support for Sun Netra T1 hardware

    * Plan which EC3 topics to pursue.

    * Reviewed long range project plans.
    (Draft: http://web.mit.edu/teamhtml/Athena/projects.html)
       o The plans were reviewed by the team and by Tom Thornton.
       o A new mini-project plan describing Email client work under
     consideration was called for, and drafted.
	(http://web.mit.edu/teamhtml/Athena/plans/email-client.html)
        o Some review was made of the question "What to do to get
'Distribute AFS' and 'Distribute Kerberos' projects out the door (See
Issues section below.)

    * Email client work: Discussed issue of UNIX email client with Owls.
	reviewed and published a draft of a transition plan
	(http://web.mit.edu/teamhtml/Athena/plans/email-transition.html)
              and the beginnings of an analysis of candidate GUI clients.
	(http://web.mit.edu/teamhtml/Athena/plans/email-candidates.html)
    * A required change to the Athena build process to have it build in 
    a chroot'ed environment.
    (Rationale:http://www.mit.edu:8008/menelaus/source-developers/414)

    * Announced proposed feature set/work plan for Athena 9.1 and begin
    process of getting feedback on it.  Published draft at:
	(http://web.mit.edu/release/www/9.1-featureset.html)

    * Coded a Sun patch to compute partition tables to eliminate having
	to hand-add an entry every time Sun releases a new disk.
                    
 Goals for the coming period:

    * Get a presentation on one of the chosen EC3 topics. 
    * Check in on Mozilla developments (Netscape-6 tech-watch)
    * Check in on Star Office 6 Beta developments (Star Office tech-watch)
    * Demonstrate tangible progress on Hardware Diversity project.
    * Test and go live with (if tests successful) the automatic Sun
partitioning code.
     * Propose a GUI Email client to Owls for consideration.
     * Have a meeting with the Usability Team to discuss GUI Zephyr
clients.  (There are two pre-existing candidate systems to review. 
There is also an interest in comparing UNIX GUI Zephyr clients with
win-zephyr.)

 Issues:

The recent Linux Patch release had a problem that affected many machines
that we did not detect in testing.  We're re-examining how we test so
that we will reduce the chance of this happening again.

In proposing to offer Kerberos and AFS as separate packages for
individual loading, a larger issue has arisen:  Who signs off on the
support issues?  Answering end-user questions about Athena as a
homogenous whole has been the focus in the past.  There has never been a
ramp-up of additional support resources for hand-holding on compponent
install issues.

There may be other components besides AFS and Kerberos desired by
customers for separate installation.  What team has the official
sign-off on new products added?
                    
 Key learnings:
                    
 Team dynamics:
                    
 Additional comments:

wdc spent a lot of time over the past month writing web pages.  He will
probably not be so prolific next month.  :-)

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post