[2169] in Release_7.7_team
Re: AFS performance measurements
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Greg Hudson)
Wed Mar 15 15:39:34 2000
Message-Id: <200003152039.PAA26604@small-gods.mit.edu>
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
cc: release-team@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 15 Mar 2000 15:07:38 EST."
<200003152007.PAA26371@small-gods.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2000 15:39:22 -0500
From: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
Just as an addendum, I tried my test again on sourcery, a 333MHz Ultra
5 with 128MB of memory, under both our current AFS module (ports 1.67)
and AFS 3.5. I got:
ports 1.67 12.81
afs3.5 3.32 12.09
Local disk 5.99
So I don't expect things to get any better with AFS 3.5,
unfortunately.
