[1411] in Release_7.7_team
Re: Cygnus GCC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex T Prengel)
Fri Jul 31 12:31:46 1998
To: Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU>
Cc: alexp@MIT.EDU, tb@MIT.EDU, release-team@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 31 Jul 1998 12:14:40 EDT."
<199807311614.MAA10170@small-gods.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 12:31:39 EDT
From: Alex T Prengel <alexp@MIT.EDU>
>It's true, though, that the cygnus locker gcc will continue to cause a
>support burden as long as it sits there and fails to work.
I haven't heard this before and it seems to work for me. In what way
is it broken? I'm reluctant to delete cygnus unless there is a good
reason... People still use it. I have a README popup that explains
the situation and that the gnu locker will be the place for new
releases. Is there more to this than I am aware of?
Alex
