[113] in Release_7.7_team
Returned mail: User unknown
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
Tue Jun 28 17:27:34 1994
Resent-From: Bill Cattey <wdc@MIT.EDU>
Resent-To: release-77@MIT.EDU
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 94 17:07:04 -0400
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@MIT.EDU>
To: wdc@MIT.EDU
----- Transcript of session follows -----
>>> RCPT To:<release.77>
<<< 550 <release.77>... User unknown: No such file or directory
550 release.77... User unknown
----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by oglala.MIT.EDU (5.57/4.7) id AA07269; Tue, 28 Jun 94 17:07:04 -0400
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 94 17:07:04 -0400
From: <wdc>
Message-Id: <9406282107.AA07269@oglala.MIT.EDU>
To: vrt
Subject: NetProb ticket #1888, rsaix 7.7B: login file stty suggestion ...
Cc: release.77
Would you put on your "long term release architect" hat and think about
where we should enqueue good ideas like this one. It is a niggling little
thing that has existed for a while. We should eventually do it, but
it shouldn't disrupt our release.
It also affects the global dot files. Don't those get reviewed through
TRB or PPT?
I am cc'ing this request to the release.77 meeting so we won't lose it.
I'm classifying it in the bug list as broken and saving it under release.
Ok?
-wdc
>From jawetzel@MIT.EDU Wed Jun 22 10:37:27 1994
>Received: by gregor.MIT.EDU (5.57/4.7) id AA19875; Wed, 22 Jun 94 10:37:25 -04>00
>Received: from SITA.MIT.EDU by MIT.EDU with SMTP
> id AA23276; Wed, 22 Jun 94 10:37:22 EDT
>Received: by sita.MIT.EDU (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.7) id AA22252; Wed, 22 Jun 1994 >10:37:21 -0400
>Message-Id: <9406221437.AA22252@sita.MIT.EDU>
>To: bugs@MIT.EDU
>Subject: rsaix 7.7B: login file stty suggestion ...
>Date: Wed, 22 Jun 1994 10:37:20 EDT
>From: The Rottweiler <jawetzel@MIT.EDU>
>
>System name: sita
>Type and version: POWER 7.7B
>Display type: hiprf3d
>
>
>This line can sometimes cause problems on the RS6000
>
>/bin/stty dec # Use DEC-style control characters
>
>This line is fine if run from terminals using the Berkeley line discipline.
>This however cannot be guaranteed (the default line discipline is POSIX).
>
>Perhaps it could be preceded by the following line to assure that the
>Berkeley line discipline is indeed being used:
>
>/bin/stty disp bsd
>
>It would be ideal to test first which line discipline is being used but I can'>t
>think of a way to do this offhand.
>
> Jake
>
