[191724] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: charges for prefix filter updates (was Re: Any ISPs using AS852

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ryan, Spencer)
Mon Sep 26 11:00:09 2016

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Ryan, Spencer" <sryan@arbor.net>
To: Ken Chase <math@sizone.org>, Jason Lixfeld <jason+nanog@lixfeld.ca>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 14:57:35 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20160926145151.GG26045@sizone.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

I've used HE's tunnelbroker (BGP) a few times to get our ARIN space to a si=
te while waiting on a local carrier to turn up v6, get the proper LOA, etc.


I've received better service from the NOC there for a service I didn't pay =
for than I have from any ISP I've ever given money. They are doing a great =
job over there. A LOA change (/48-->/40 le 48) took about an hour.


Spencer Ryan | Senior Systems Administrator | sryan@arbor.net<mailto:sryan@=
arbor.net>
Arbor Networks
+1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m)
www.arbornetworks.com<http://www.arbornetworks.com/>


________________________________
From: NANOG <nanog-bounces@nanog.org> on behalf of Ken Chase <math@sizone.o=
rg>
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 10:51:51 AM
To: Jason Lixfeld
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: charges for prefix filter updates (was Re: Any ISPs using AS85=
2 for IP Transit?)

Followup: we did the quote/PO/sign-the-order dance. That took about 3-4 day=
s
not including our side's lag (which was not insignificant, Im not the guy w=
ith
the pen). But now it's gone to provisioning and will be a standard *5 days*=
.

Cogent will do this in about 1-6 hours if you provide the LOA's with the re=
quest.
So will HE. And many others.

/kc


On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 02:28:50PM -0400, Ken Chase said:
  >I feel this can be a public topic:
  >
  >Rogers just charged us that for an update (one update, multiple entries)=
.
  >We had to go through their quotation machinery too, took like 4-5 days. =
Additional
  >time was wasted because we contacted their tech dept directly at the sta=
rt. (which
  >is what I do for all my other upstreams...)
  >
  >Kinda brutal.
  >
  >Cogent and HE nor NAC or Yipes or Tata ever did that to us.
  >
  >Nickle and diming -- why, cuz transit is a cheap commodity now, gotta ma=
ke the
  >cash somewhere?
  >
  >That said Cogent offered us a static /26 along side our BGP years ago th=
en warned
  >us it'd be $50/mo or something for that # of ips going forward. We didnt=
 need it
  >so dispensed with it.
  >
  >/kc
  >
  >
  >On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 02:07:01PM -0400, Jason Lixfeld said:
  >  >If there are any ISPs who use TELUS/AS852 for IP Transit over BGP, I?=
??d be interested in hearing from you.
  >  >
  >  >I???d like to compare notes to see if you are also paying $250 for ea=
ch BGP prefix filter updated request, or if we???re the only ones???
  >  >
  >  >Thanks in advance!
  >
  >--
  >Ken Chase - math@sizone.org Toronto Canada

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post