[191715] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: One Year On: IPv4 Exhaust

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (nanog-isp@mail.com)
Mon Sep 26 09:25:44 2016

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: nanog-isp@mail.com
To: "Owen DeLong" <owen@delong.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 15:25:38 +0200
In-Reply-To: <D796EBC8-403B-4014-A0CB-014AA49F0133@delong.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

> From: "Owen DeLong" 
>
>> I know, but for the "server guys" turning on IPv6 it's pretty low on
>> priority list.
>
> Which is a selfish, arrogant, and extremely short-sighted and unenlightened view of self-interest.
  Yes, yes, but is it economically rational?


Jared

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post