[112353] in tlhIngan-Hol
Re: [tlhIngan Hol] X which are not Y
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (SuStel)
Fri Mar 22 11:52:04 2019
X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
From: SuStel <sustel@trimboli.name>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:52:01 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAG84SOsfzMDbh6iosxaZp5HQ_70kR45YfMjcoMt5zOv8-e-wNw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============0048770213641212752==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------30143575F495A24769A5C310"
Content-Language: en-US
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------30143575F495A24769A5C310
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 3/22/2019 11:47 AM, nIqolay Q wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:17 PM Christa Hansberry
> <chransberry@gmail.com <mailto:chransberry@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> If I wanted to say, for example, "animals which are not tribbles",
> how would I do it? I don't think *yIHmey bIHbe'bogh
> Ha'DIbaHmey('e'?)* would be grammatical... but is there a good way
> to say it?
>
>
> Why wouldn't it be grammatical? Pronouns-as-copula can take *-be'*:
> *loD Quch jIHbe'/./* They can take *-bogh*: paq'batlh has
> *ghaHtaHbogh*. *yIHmey bIHbe'bogh Ha'DIbaHmey'e'* seems completely
> fine to me.
Note that the *-'e'* is not optional here.
Not only is it grammatical, but I don't see any reason not to say it
either, if it best expresses what you mean.
--
SuStel
http://trimboli.name
--------------30143575F495A24769A5C310
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 3/22/2019 11:47 AM, nIqolay Q wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAG84SOsfzMDbh6iosxaZp5HQ_70kR45YfMjcoMt5zOv8-e-wNw@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:17 PM
Christa Hansberry <<a href="mailto:chransberry@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true">chransberry@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="auto">If I wanted to say, for example, "animals
which are not tribbles", how would I do it? I don't think
*yIHmey bIHbe'bogh Ha'DIbaHmey('e'?)* would be
grammatical... but is there a good way to say it? <br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"
class="gmail_default">Why wouldn't it be grammatical?
Pronouns-as-copula can take <b>-be'</b>: <b>loD Quch jIHbe'<i>.</i></b>
They can take <b>-bogh</b>: paq'batlh has <b>ghaHtaHbogh</b>.
<b>yIHmey bIHbe'bogh Ha'DIbaHmey'e'</b> seems completely fine to
me.</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Note that the <b>-'e'</b> is not optional here.</p>
<p>Not only is it grammatical, but I don't see any reason not to say
it either, if it best expresses what you mean.<br>
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
SuStel
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://trimboli.name">http://trimboli.name</a></pre>
</body>
</html>
--------------30143575F495A24769A5C310--
--===============0048770213641212752==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org
--===============0048770213641212752==--
