[112340] in tlhIngan-Hol

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [tlhIngan Hol] [Tlhingan-hol] Stonewall Poster Goes Klingon ...

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (De'vID)
Fri Mar 22 03:37:37 2019

X-Original-To: tlhingan-hol@lists.kli.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+7zAmONLS4LhLg_EXx6n1au6L9PdeTASbWoEAKY-_YrVRV7eg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "De'vID" <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 08:37:21 +0100
To: tlhIngan-Hol <tlhingan-hol@kli.org>
Reply-To: tlhingan-hol@kli.org
Errors-To: tlhingan-hol-bounces@lists.kli.org

--===============2738257730779279000==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007891f60584a9edc8"

--0000000000007891f60584a9edc8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

On Sat, 4 May 2013 at 08:07, De'vID <de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com> wrote:

> As defined, {nga'chuq} means "sex (i.e., perform sex; always subject)"
> according to HQ 1.3 p.9. I've always interpreted the "always subject"
> annotation to mean that the parties named in the subject are having
> sex with each other.
>

A discussion about {nga'chuq} came up on Facebook. Okrand confirmed this
interpretation to me (that the subject of this verb must be plural, and are
engaged in sexual intercourse with each other) in July 2013 when we had a
brief chat about the Stonewall campaign. I'd made a note of it at the time
in {boQwI'}, but don't seem to have posted about it to the mailing list, so
I'm doing it now.

-- 
De'vID

--0000000000007891f60584a9edc8
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div dir=3D"ltr"><br></div><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">=
<div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_attr">On Sat, 4 May 2013 at 08:07, De&#39;v=
ID &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com">de.vid.jonpin@gmail.com</=
a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0p=
x 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">As=
 defined, {nga&#39;chuq} means &quot;sex (i.e., perform sex; always subject=
)&quot;<br>
according to HQ 1.3 p.9. I&#39;ve always interpreted the &quot;always subje=
ct&quot;<br>
annotation to mean that the parties named in the subject are having<br>
sex with each other.=C2=A0<br>
</blockquote></div><div><br></div>A discussion about {nga&#39;chuq} came up=
 on Facebook. Okrand confirmed this interpretation to me (that the subject =
of this verb must be plural, and are engaged in sexual intercourse with eac=
h other) in July 2013 when we had a brief chat about the Stonewall campaign=
. I&#39;d made a note of it at the time in {boQwI&#39;}, but don&#39;t seem=
 to have posted about it to the mailing list, so I&#39;m doing it now.<br c=
lear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr" class=3D"gmail_signatur=
e">De&#39;vID</div></div>

--0000000000007891f60584a9edc8--

--===============2738257730779279000==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
tlhIngan-Hol mailing list
tlhIngan-Hol@lists.kli.org
http://lists.kli.org/listinfo.cgi/tlhingan-hol-kli.org

--===============2738257730779279000==--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post