[16590] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Cryptography Research wants piracy speed bump on HD DVDs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Taral)
Wed Dec 22 15:58:28 2004
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 13:24:59 -0600
From: Taral <taral@taral.net>
To: Matt Crawford <crawdad@fnal.gov>
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <A9B7AB46-543A-11D9-8548-000A95A0BF96@fnal.gov>
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:58:11AM -0600, Matt Crawford wrote:
>=20
> On Dec 15, 2004, at 11:54, Taral wrote:
>=20
> >What stops someone using 3 players and majority voting on frame data
> >bits?
>=20
> As I understand it, they use such a huge number of bits for marking,=20
> that any reasonably-sized assembly of players will still coincide on=20
> some marked bits.
> (However, I very much doubt whether they can blacklist all the players=20
> in the assembly without blacklisting some "innocent" players as well!)
Is there really that much space for marking? Any substantial number of
marked bits will become obvious in the output stream, no?
--=20
Taral <taral@taral.net>
This message is digitally signed. Please PGP encrypt mail to me.
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBycoLtOVKlL8cHDcRAvm+AJ9StVQa8oEkkvdPJ4aqS/v1jgkLNQCeILk8
+J+oy+TVOpyU49J0pN+0hyQ=
=rGd8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
