[10] in release-74
[jtkohl@cs.berkeley.edu: Re: try kerberized telnet/telnetd on your workstation ]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Rosenstein)
Wed Apr 15 23:55:38 1992
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 92 23:54:53 -0400
From: Mark Rosenstein <mar@MIT.EDU>
To: release-74@MIT.EDU, jis@MIT.EDU, brlewis@MIT.EDU
Following a discussion about the kerberized telnetd that we decided
not to do, John says:
From: John T Kohl <jtkohl@cs.berkeley.edu>
Subject: Re: try kerberized telnet/telnetd on your workstation
I would suggest that even if you don't take the authentication options,
you should take the other new option stuff (which is RFC'ed and
codified), such as the options I mentioned in a previous message.
John
I think this is a good idea which we could do either by including the
telnetd as-is or the telnetd with the disputed authentication option
removed. Let's discuss it at the ACT meeting today.
-Mark
