[15978] in Public-Access_Computer_Systems_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

[CurrentCites] Current Cites, July 2005

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Roy Tennant)
Mon Jul 25 20:42:22 2005

X-Original-To: currentcites@lists.webjunction.org
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Errors-To: currentcites-bounces@webjunction.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID:  <888FE56D-F2F6-439E-A1C8-25C051D809FA@ucop.edu>
Date:         Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:36:15 -0700
Reply-To: Public-Access Computer Systems Forum <PACS-L@LISTSERV.UH.EDU>
From: Roy Tennant <Roy.Tennant@UCOP.EDU>
To: PACS-L@LISTSERV.UH.EDU

                                   Current Cites

                                     July 2005
          http://lists.webjunction.org/currentcites/2005/cc05.16.7.html

                              Edited by [2]Roy Tennant

    Contributors: [3]Charles W. Bailey, Jr., [4]Shirl Kennedy, [5]Roy
    Tennant
             ____________________________________________________

    "[6]Tenth Anniversary Issue"  [7]D-Lib Magazine  11(7/8)(July/August
    2005)(http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july05/07contents.html). - This
    anniversary issue celebrates ten years of publication. From its
    [8]first issue, D-Lib Magazine has been a key resource for those
    interested in digital library technologies and techniques. One of  
the
    strengths of the magazine has been its ability to attract important,
    useful articles from both the computer science and library science
    communities, and therefore serve as a common meeting ground where we
    can collaborate to further our common goals. As an example, even the
    first issue mixed an article on metadata from a librarian (Stu  
Weibel
    from OCLC) with an article on digital library architectures from a
    computer scientist (Bill Arms from Cornell). The anniversary issue
    appropriately inludes pieces from those two contributors as well  
as a
    number of other leading lights from both disciplines. Current Cites
    salutes the D-Lib Magazine anniversary, in particular since pieces
    from that source are cited frequently in our own publication. May
    D-Lib Magazine have many, many good years ahead. - [9]RT

    Dietz, Roland, and Carl  Grant. "[10]The Dis-Integrating World of
    Library Automation"  [11]Library Journal  (15 June
    2005)(http://libraryjournal.com/article/CA606392.html). - Dietz and
    Grant are by no means the first to advocate busting apart the
    integrated library system into interoperable components. Andrew Pace
    (in his [12]February 1, 2004 Library Journal cover article) has
    certainly said as much, as have others. But what makes this piece so
    ground-breaking is that it is written by two leaders of library
    systems companies. In other words, these are the very folks with the
    power to put what they say into play. Skeptics may say they want to
    see them "put their money where their mouth is," but if so Dietz and
    Grant can point to the [13]Vendor Initiative for Enabling Web  
Services
    (VIEWS) as evidence that they are serious. - [14]RT

    Gardner, Susannah. "[15]Time to Check: Are You Using the Right
    Blogging Tool?"  [16]Online Journalism Review  (14 July
    2005)(http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/050714gardner/). - Blog we  
must,
    but how? And what's a trackback, anyway? Try this handy analysis of
    major blogging software, complete with a blogging terminology guide.
    Not to be missed is the link to the detailed "Blog software  
comparison
    chart." Before you know it you'll be moblogging and using
    bookmarklets. - [17]CB

    Mills, Elinor. "[18]In Canada: Cache a Page, Go to Jail?"  [19]CNET
    News.com  (19 July
    2005)(http://news.com.com/In+Canada+Cache+a+page%2C+go+to+jail/ 
2100-10
    28_3-5793659.html?tag=cd.top). - Is it the beginning of the end for
    search engines? In Canada, a bill under consideration (Bill C-60)
    appears to make the storage and provision of crawled Web pages
    illegal. According to copyright attorney Howard Knopf: "The way it
    reads, arguably what they're saying is that the very act of making a
    reproduction by way of caching is illegal." Search engines could  
face
    a legal environment where they could be much more easily sued unless
    Web pages were removed whenever copyright holders requested it. Of
    course, this potential law has generated quite a buzz. A [20]posting
    on Traffick takes a calmer view and provides a link to an  
analysis of
    the situation by Eric Goldman. It's worth a look. - [21]CB

    Quint, Barbara. "[22]OCLC Pilots Traditional Libraries into Web
    Services"  [23]NewsBreaks  (5 July
    2005)(http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb050705-2.shtml). - We  
all
    know that many of our users are using Google for what they formerly
    used their local library to accomplish. And if they fail in Google,
    they may not think to fall back on us. So what to do? The best thing
    may be to meet them where they are -- in Google. But how? It clearly
    takes a big play, which no single library is really equipped to do.
    Enter OCLC. Their [24]Open WorldCat program makes it possible for
    Google and Yahoo users to discover library materials in their search
    results. But as Barbara Quint reports in this article, OCLC sees  
that
    as merely the wedge into a wide array of library-based services.
    Having noted that some of the inquiries they were getting from users
    were reference questions and others were requests to buy the book,
    OCLC is now moving to serve those needs and still others as well.  
The
    end result for us is likely seeing some of the users we lost with  
the
    advent of Google being redirected back to us from Google when
    appropriate. Wouldn't that be nice. - [25]RT

    Talbot, David. "[26]The Fading Memory of the State"  [27]Technology
    Review  (July
    2005)(http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/05/07/issue/ 
feature_mem
    ory.asp). - The [28]National Archives and Records Administration
    (NARA) has a big problem. Because "(e)lectronic records rot much
    faster than paper ones," NARA has got to quickly develop a way of
    saving the "tsunami" of contemporary digital government records. "It
    is confronting thousands of incompatible data formats cooked up  
by the
    computer industry over the past several decades, not to mention the
    limited lifespan of electronic storage media themselves." The
    Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and other core
    documents, "written on durable calfskin parchment," live in sealed
    glass cases, immersed in protective argon gas. NARA has hired two
    contractors, Harris Corporation and Lockheed Martin, to come up  
with a
    similar durable means of storage for digital records. A secondary
    issue is that many electronic records are simply not being  
retained in
    the first place. Organizations in the private sector are, of course,
    facing similar crises, but the sheer size and scope of NARA's
    situation is a problem of unimaginable complexity. And because the
    agency has no good system for absorbing more data, a staggering
    backlog of electronic records hangs in limbo at countless federal
    agencies. This article talks about research efforts and potential
    solutions to NARA's situation. - [29]SK
      _________________________________________________________________

      [32]WebJunction.org
    Current Cites - ISSN: 1060-2356 is hosted by the community at
    WebJunction.org.
    © Copyright 2005 by Roy Tennant
    [33]Creative Commons License

References

    1. file://localhost/currentcites/
    2. http://roytennant.com/
    3. http://www.escholarlypub.com/cwb/bailey.htm
    4. http://www.uncagedlibrarian.com/
    5. http://roytennant.com/
    6. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july05/07contents.html
    7. http://www.dlib.org/
    8. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/July95/07contents.html
    9. http://roytennant.com/
   10. http://libraryjournal.com/article/CA606392.html
   11. http://www.libraryjournal.com/
   12. http://libraryjournal.com/article/CA374953.html
   13. http://www.views-consortia.org/
   14. http://roytennant.com/
   15. http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/050714gardner/
   16. http://www.ojr.org/
   17. http://www.escholarlypub.com/cwb/bailey.htm
   18. http://news.com.com/In+Canada+Cache+a+page%2C+go+to+jail/ 
2100-1028_3-5793659.html?tag=cd.top
   19. http://news.com.com/2001-1_3-0.html?tag=ne.tab.hd
   20. http://www.traffick.com/2005/07/internet-archiving-illegal.asp
   21. http://www.escholarlypub.com/cwb/bailey.htm
   22. http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb050705-2.shtml
   23. http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/default.shtml
   24. http://www.oclc.org/worldcat/open/default.htm
   25. http://roytennant.com/
   26. http://www.technologyreview.com/articles/05/07/issue/ 
feature_memory.asp
   27. http://www.technologyreview.com/
   28. http://www.nara.gov/
   29. http://www.uncagedlibrarian.com/
   30. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer
   31. http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F% 
2Flists.webjunction.org%2Fcurrentcites%2Fstyle.css&usermedium=all
   32. http://webjunction.org/
   33. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/


_______________________________________________
CurrentCites mailing list
CurrentCites@webjunction.org
http://lists.webjunction.org/currentcites/

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post