[15725] in Public-Access_Computer_Systems_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Current Cites, March 2005

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (CITES Moderator)
Mon Mar 28 20:40:11 2005

Message-ID:  <Pine.OSF.4.10.10503251816510.352124-100000@library.berkeley.edu>
Date:         Fri, 25 Mar 2005 18:46:29 -0800
Reply-To: cites@library.berkeley.edu
From: CITES Moderator <citeschk@library.berkeley.edu>
To: PACS-L@LISTSERV.UH.EDU

                              Current Cites

                                March 2005

        http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/CurrentCites/2005/cc05.16.3.html

                         Edited by [2]Roy Tennant

   Contributors: [3]Charles W. Bailey, Jr., [4]Shirl Kennedy, [5]Leo
   Robert Klein, Jim Ronningen, [6]Roy Tennant

   [7]Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community  18(1)(2005) - This
   issue of Serials has a number of interesting papers on open access. In
   "A Mandate to Self Archive? The Role of Open Access Institutional
   Repositories," Stephen Pinfield, tackles the controversial issue of
   mandating the deposit of articles in institutional repositories. In
   "Open Access: Evidence-Based Policy or Policy-Based Evidence? The
   University Press Perspective," Martin Richardson describes experiments
   at Oxford University Press with different OA journal publishing
   models. In "Open Access: Principle, Practice, Progress," Jan Velterop
   argues that the open access battle for hearts and minds is gaining
   ground, but implementation issues remain and misconceptions about OA
   persist. In "Open Access: Reflections from the United States," Ann
   Okerson weighs the pros and cons of OA for US research libraries,
   noting that institutional repositories are likely to be expensive, and
   their focus in the U.S. is likely to be on locally produced scholarly
   materials other than articles. Consequently: "It is unlikely that
   under this kind of scenario in the US, scattered local versions of STM
   articles would compete effectively with the completeness or the value
   that the publishing community adds." She also suggests that library
   cost savings resulting from OA journals are "unlikely, unless
   substantial production cost reductions can be realised by many
   categories of publisher." In "Open Access to the Medical Literature:
   How Much Content Is Available in Published Journals?," Marie E.
   McVeigh and James K. Pringle report that for the research and clinical
   medicine journals that they studied "26% of the journals made their
   most recent issues open access, and 21% of articles since 1992 were
   available as open access." In "Overview of the House of Commons
   Science and Technology Select Committee Inquiry into Scientific
   Publications," Ian Gibson discusses the important activities of the
   Select Committee that he chaired. Finally, in "Scientific
   Publications: Free for All? The Academic Library Viewpoint," Tom
   Graham examines the key findings of the Select Committee's influential
   report and criticizes the U.K. Government's response to it. - [8]CB

   Associated Press.  "[9]Next Hot Trend for Cell Phones: Reading?"
   [10]MSNBC.com  (18 March 2005)(http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7232995/).
   - "Your eyes probably hurt just thinking about it," this article
   begins, and...yep. Nevertheless thousands of Japanese folks are
   downloading and reading full-text novels on their cell phone screens.
   Of course, the average Japanese consumer is a sophisticated user of
   wireless technology anyhow; the cell phone there is routinely used as
   both "an entertainment and communication device." And now there are a
   number of websites where folks can browse and select from among
   classics, bestsellers and "works written especially for the medium."
   Quite honestly, it does not sound very enjoyable. "Only a few lines
   pop up at a time because the phone screen is about half the size of a
   business card." The latest technology is Java-based and incorporates
   such ease-of-use features as "automatic page-flipping, or scrolling."
   According to the article, this trend could spread to the U.S., noting
   that "Random House recently bought a stake in [11]VOCEL, a San
   Diego-based company that provides such mobile-phone products as
   Scholastic Aptitude Test preparation programs." Consumers in China and
   South Korea hava already begun to embrace cell phone reading. What's
   weird is that people are using this medium even when not on the go; a
   recent marketing study found that 50 percent of cell phone readers are
   female, and many are doing their cell phone reading in the home. What
   sorts of books are people reading on their cell phones? Classics they
   never got around to, sex manuals they'd be embarrassed to buy in the
   dead.tree version...but the most popular content is an electronic
   dictionary. - [12]SK

   Babb, Nancy M.  "Cataloging Spirits and the Spirit of Cataloging"
   [13]Cataloging & Classification Quarterly  40(2)(2005) - Here's the
   problem: take any spiritual communication in published form. You have
   the medium who physically delivers the message and the originating
   spirit who generated the message. Who should get credit? If you're a
   cataloger, you'll know that this is no idle question since the work
   has to be attributed to someone. The author of this article, Nancy M.
   Babb, a cataloger at SUNY Buffalo, stresses that giving credit to the
   spirit illustrates the advance in cataloging over the centuries in
   that a "bibliographic" entity is preferred over a "biographical" one.
   Such considerations are "exemplar of complex authorship", Babb argues.
   They illustrate a more "inclusive and expansive concept" of
   authorship; one that is centered on "what will be of most value to
   catalog users". Babb in this breathless review of cataloging history
   confirms what many of us have long suspected, namely, that "an author
   need not physically exist to have recognized bibliographic identity
   within the library catalog." - [14]LRK

   Bailey, Jr., Charles W.  [15]Open Access Bibliography: Liberating
   Scholarly Literature with E-Prints and Open Access Journals  Mountain
   View, CA: Association of Research Libraries, March
   2005.(http://info.lib.uh.edu/cwb/oab.pdf). - Long-time Current Cites
   contributor Charles W. Bailey, Jr. has published a bibliography on the
   movement to free the scholarly literature. Available both online and
   in print from the Association of Research Libraries, this thorough and
   authoritative bibliography will serve as the seminal bibliographic
   source for this movement. Over 1,300 selected English language books,
   conference papers, journal articles and a number of other sources
   (including digital videos) are included. Anyone interested in the Open
   Access movement will likely find this contribution to the effort to be
   an instant classic. - [16]RT

   Fescemyer, Kathy. "Serials Clutter in Online Catalogs"  [17]Serials
   Review  31(1)(March 2005): 14-19. - Dealing with serials records in
   the OPAC can be confusing even to librarians. It isn't always apparent
   what record is the microfilm and what record is the electronic
   version. The author looked at how easy it was to find a number of
   titles in nine large academic libraries. Next she measured the
   physical length of the records she found. In many cases, it was
   difficult to find the right record when using titles such as "Science"
   or "Nature". Many of the records contained holdings information that
   ran to several hundred lines. The author argues for simpler records
   with one bibliographic record per journal regardless of format. She
   also points to the need to prioritize information making less
   information the default setting. Someone looking for a call number
   ought not to have to trudge though a sea of volume and issue listings.
   Of course, this is as much an OPAC-Vendor problem as a library
   problem. Doing what the author suggests (i.e. making a simpler
   interface for serials) can only be achieved in certain OPACs (if at
   all) through considerable customization. It ought not to be so hard! -
   [18]LRK

   Mao, Ji-Ye, Karel  Vredenburg, and Paul W.  Smith, et. al."State of
   User-Centered Design Practice"  [19]Communications of the ACM
   48(3)(March 2005): 105-109. - Some interesting results from a survey
   of people involved with User-Centered Design (UCD). The authors
   suggest that UCD is meeting with growing acceptance as a necessary
   component of software development. This is thanks to the realization
   on the part of developers that if users can't use their software,
   they'll go elsewhere. Nevertheless, UCD continues to be plagued by
   difficulties in measuring success and establishing clear goals. Some
   of the more common techniques used are "iterative design, usability
   evaluation, task analysis, informal expert review, and field studies".
   The authors found that techniques tended to be either used or avoided
   due to the perceived cost in time and money. They argue for a more
   complete approach. (Note, CACM also has an interesting section on the
   "Disappearing Computer" -- featuring interesting projects that make
   use of ubiquitous computing). - [20]LRK

   Mendoza, Martha. "[21]AP Review: Gov't Reducing Access to Info"
   [22]Guardian Unlimited  (13 March
   2005)(http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4862137,00.h
   tml). - In a piece that will likely suprise few librarians, an
   Associated Press review has documented a major clampdown on the
   release of government information to the American public. "The federal
   government - not including the CIA - created 14 million new classified
   documents in fiscal year 2003, a 60 percent increase over 2001,
   according to the Information Security Oversight Office. At the same
   time, the agency reports that it cut back on the number of documents
   that were declassified" the article states. The Associated Press
   documents a number of other findings from its review that anyone
   interested in government by the people, for the people, will find
   chilling. - [23]RT

   Olsen, Stefanie. "[24]Yahoo's Game of Photo Tag"  [25]CNet News.com
   (22 March
   2005)(http://news.com.com/2102-1032_3-5630403.html?tag=st.util.print).
   - A number of web sites such as the photo sharing site [26]Flickr and
   the link sharing site [27]Del.icio.us hav e provided a way for users
   to attach their own topics (or "tags") to their links and photos. This
   activity inspired Thomas Vander Wal to coin the term "folksonomies"
   for user-created taxonomies. The purchase of Flickr by Yahoo! has
   provided even more attention to this phenomenon, highighted in this
   article. Although this is one of the hottest new topics in the press
   at the moment, the jury is still out on just how effective this
   technique will be in making things easier to find. As quoted in the
   article, information architect Peter Merholtz thinks that "the future
   of folksnomies involves meshing these user-generated categorizations
   with more standardized categorizations, such as the Library of
   Congress or the Getty Thesaurus of place names, so you could start to
   connect data to allow more of these associations to be made." - [28]RT

   Rossman, Parker. "Beyond the Book: Electronic Textbooks Will Bring
   Worldwide Learning"  [29]The Futurist  39(1)(January-February
   2005): 18-23. - Gee whiz! And you'll eat your dinner in a tasty little
   pill ... when you need a break from soldering the wiring of our
   utopian days to come, take a look at this. It's worth it because it's
   the kind of writing that creates unrealistic expectations and causes
   purse string-holding politicians to salivate over the spending cuts of
   the world of tomorrow. It's part Futuramaesque boosterism (I'll admit
   to a pang of nostalgia for the Disney shows of my childhood), part
   mid-90's Wired magazine wipe-the-slate-clean prognosticating (without
   the fuchsia and lime green) and part laundry list of the kinds of
   educational technology which divert students' attention from the
   content to the medium. You'll notice that "academic rigor" isn't an
   ingredient in this recipe, but it is meant for a general audience.
   Granted that this mix of fact and imagination does give some plausible
   examples of how some of the poor or handicapped might benefit from
   digital information, but it does a disservice to the teachers who
   struggle daily with aging infrastructure, shrinking resources and
   students who want to hear that books are obsolete. But I forgot -
   that's not a futurist's job. - JR
     _________________________________________________________________

   Current Cites - ISSN: 1060-2356 is hosted by the community at
      WebJunction.org.
   Copyright &copy; 2005 by Roy Tennant [33]Creative Commons License

References

   Visible links
   1. http://sunsite/CurrentCites/
   2. http://roytennant.com/
   3. http://info.lib.uh.edu/cwb/bailey.htm
   4. http://www.uncagedlibrarian.com/
   5. http://leoklein.com/
   6. http://roytennant.com/
   7. http://www.uksg.org/serials.asp
   8. http://info.lib.uh.edu/cwb/bailey.htm
   9. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7232995/
  10. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/
  11. http://www.vocel.com/
  12. http://www.uncagedlibrarian.com/
  13. http://www.haworthpressinc.com/store/product.asp?sku=J104
  14. http://leoklein.com/
  15. http://info.lib.uh.edu/cwb/oab.pdf
  16. http://roytennant.com/
  17. http://www.elsevier.com/wps/product/cws_home/620213
  18. http://leoklein.com/
  19. http://www.acm.org/cacm/
  20. http://leoklein.com/
  21. http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-4862137,00.html
  22. http://www.guardian.co.uk/
  23. http://roytennant.com/
  24. http://news.com.com/2102-1032_3-5630403.html?tag=st.util.print
  25. http://news.com.com/
  26. http://www.flickr.com/
  27. http://del.icio.us/
  28. http://roytennant.com/
  29. http://www.wfs.org/futurist.htm
  30. http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer
  31.
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fsunsite.berkeley.edu%2FCurrentCites%2Fstyle.css&usermedium=all
  32. http://webjunction.org/
  33. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post