[15487] in Public-Access_Computer_Systems_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Current Cites, July 2004

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (CITES Moderator)
Tue Jul 27 20:10:33 2004

Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 11:44:19 -0700
From: CITES Moderator <citeschk@LIBRARY.BERKELEY.EDU>
To: PACS-L@LISTSERV.UH.EDU
Reply-to: cites@LIBRARY.BERKELEY.EDU
Message-id: <Pine.OSF.4.10.10407271117170.120851-100000@library.berkeley.edu>

                               Current Cites

                        Volume 15, no. 7, July 2004

                          Edited by [2]Roy Tennant

                             ISSN: 1060-2356 -
        http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/CurrentCites/2004/cc04.15.7.html

      Contributors: [3]Charles W. Bailey, Jr., [4]Terry Huwe, [5]Shirl
        Kennedy, [6]Leo Robert Klein, Jim Ronningen, [7]Roy Tennant

     Alves, Rosental Calmon.  "[8]Many Newspaper Sites Still Cling to
     Once-a-Day Publish Cycle"  [9]Online Journalism Review   (21 July
     2004) (http://ojr.org/ojr/workplace/1090395903.php). - This article
     reports on research from the University of Texas at Austin which
     found that out of 30 news websites being monitored, "only 12
     updated their home pages frequently, and the rest made few or no
     changes during the day." This, says the writer, demonstrates "the
     difficulty in breaking out of the print paradigm." No consensus
     exists in the news industry as to how often websites should be
     updated. The study also found that smaller papers were less likely
     to update their sites during the day than larger papers, and that
     national news was the element most likely to be changed, followed
     by local/regional news. Few papers updated existing stories on
     their websites. - [10]SK

     Gibbons, Susan.  "Establishing an Institutional Repository"
     [11]Library Technology Reports   40(4) (July-August 2004) -
     Institutional repositories are a hot topic with academic
     institutions, and in particular academic libraries. This 67-page
     report is an excellent summary of institutional repository
     benefits, potential uses, features, costs, and software options.
     The author has been involved with establishing an institutional
     repository at her institution, but it's also clear that she did her
     homework in putting this publication together. The information here
     is accurate and up-to-date, and can serve as a very useful overview
     of the state of institutional repositories currently as well as
     useful guidance for any institution wishing to create such a
     repository. Although LTR is published on a subscription basis,
     individual issues can be purchased at the web site
     ([12]www.techsource.ala.org). - [13]RT

     Goodman, Andrew.  "[14]The Future of Search"  [15]SearchEngineWatch
       (22 July 2004)
     (http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3384481). - In
     this report from the Search Engine Strategies 2004 Conference, held
     in March of this year, personalization is identified as "a key
     driver of change" in the search engine industry. It will affect
     both how search results are displayed to users and the content of
     those results -- e.g., a "self-learning" technology will be able to
     determine whether a user who types "eagles" into the search box is
     looking for information about the national bird or the NFL team.
     Keyword advertising will increasingly be targeted geographically,
     by IP address or by country. Several of the panel pundits at this
     conference agreed that "the concept of a single set of rankings on
     a given phrase (what search marketers often call 'the algorithm')
     may soon be obsolete." Also discussed was "paid inclusion" -- where
     advertisers ante up to have their links included in search results.
     Different companies have tried different methods of doing this, but
     as the writer pointed out, most of them "seem to understand that
     search engines lose their credibility when they turn into glorified
     referral services." - [16]SK

     Huffaker, David.  "[17]The Educated Blogger: Using Weblogs to
     Promote Literacy in the Classroom"  [18]First Monday   9(6) (7 June
     2004)
     (http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_6/huffaker/index.html). -
     Huffaker explores the emerging potential of Weblogs as teaching
     tools for youth. Over 50 percent of all Bloggers are teens, yet
     Blogs as hands-on classroom teaching tools are still in the
     theoretical stage. He identifies several key value points of
     Blogging for classroom instruction, including instant publishing,
     journal (or diary) keeping, and two way communication -- all by
     means of a very simple interface. In some ways, Huffaker's analysis
     of Blogs casts them as a simpler version of 'ePortfolios' --
     persistent, Web-based domains at colleges and universities that
     follow students through their entire academic career. His principal
     argument is based on the long-accepted fact that young students
     respond favorably to learning environments that emphasize
     storytelling, collaborative learning, and personal expression. He
     concludes by suggesting that more research into this area is
     needed, particularly in exploring how students develop language and
     vocabulary skills within the domain of the Blogosphere. - [19]TH

     Lavoie, Brian, and Lorcan  Dempsey.  "[20]Thirteen Ways of Looking
     at...Digital Preservation"  [21]D-Lib Magazine   10(7/8)
     (July/August 2004)
     (http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july04/lavoie/07lavoie.html). - It's
     certainly a sign of maturity in our understanding of digital
     preservation, that we can have a thoughtful article like this that
     concentrates on issues beyond the more familiar technical
     obstacles. Indeed, the authors make clear that the technical part
     cannot happen as an "isolated process" but only as part of a
     broader "digital information environment." The authors go into 13
     different considerations with this wider context in mind. - [22]LRK

     McCook, Alison.  "[23]Open Access to US Govt Work Urged"  [24]The
     Scientist   (21 July 2004)
     (http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20040721/01/). - Open access has
     been on the agenda of legislative committees in both the US and the
     UK of late. In the US, the House of Representatives Appropriations
     Committee recommended that NIH-funded research be made freely
     available on PubMed Central six months after it is published. If
     NIH funds were used to pay for publication fees, immediate
     availability would be required. Meanwhile in the UK, the House of
     Commons Science and Technology Committee wrapped up lengthy
     hearings into scientific publishing and issued a [25]report that
     recommended funding institutional repositories and mandating that
     funded research be put in them (more on this development in "[26]UK
     Committee Backs Open Access"). (If this wasn't enough to delight OA
     advocates, the European Commission has started its own
     [27]investigation into scientific publishing.) - [28]CB

     McHugo, Ann, and Carol  Magenau.  "Reinventing Acquisitions with a
     'Forget-to-Do' List"  [29]Serials Librarian   46(3/4) (2004):
     269-273. - Not your mother or father's Acquisitions. That's what I
     thought when I went over this presentation originally given at last
     year's North American Serials Interest Group Conference in
     Portland. The first job I ever had in a library was in Serials --
     Check-in, thank you -- so it was particularly interesting to see
     how the Acquisitions Department at Dartmouth was meeting the
     challenge of managing new digital services and formats while
     maintaining a tight lid on budgets and staff. Their solution was to
     drop (or otherwise modify) many procedures and processes long
     familiar to the acquisition function. This included such hallowed
     things as serials claims and TOC current awareness services. The
     Q&A section at the end of the report is also helpful in
     understanding how these changes were made. - [30]LRK

     Weber, Steven. The Success of Open Source    Cambridge, Mass.:
     Harvard University Press, 2004. - The Success of Open Source is a
     clearly-written scholarly book about a subject relevant to anyone
     who uses a computer. While the history and development of the open
     source movement is given here, the value of the book lies in this
     political scientist's exploration of the larger issues arising from
     the phenomenon of self-governing groups which evolve very complex
     software programs outside of the commercial proprietary realm. From
     the preface: "By experimenting with fundamental notions of what
     constitutes property, this community has reframed and recast some
     of the most basic problems of governance. At the same time, it is
     remaking the politics and economics of the software world." After
     describing in detail the people and processes behind projects such
     as Linux, Weber seems to account for every ripple in the large
     ripple effect which they create. Among the many examples he gives
     to illustrate open source's impact, a representative one is his
     point that Apache, the popular open source Web server software,
     performs the unintended purpose of keeping the server side from
     being hijacked to favor a particular dominant proprietary Web
     browser. Even people who've never given a moment's thought to where
     software comes from are, as end-users, affected by
     technology-enhanced openness efforts such as open access scholarly
     publishing, and Weber's analysis informs those developments too. -
     JR
     _________________________________________________________________

                      Current Cites - ISSN: 1060-2356
   Copyright (c) 2004 by the Regents of the University of California All
                              rights reserved.

   Copying is permitted for noncommercial use by computerized bulletin
   board/conference systems, individual scholars, and libraries.
   Libraries are authorized to add the journal to their collections at no
   cost. This message must appear on copied material. All commercial use
   requires permission from the editor. All product names are trademarks
   or registered trade marks of their respective holders. Mention of a
   product in this publication does not necessarily imply endorsement of
   the product. To subscribe to the Current Cites distribution list, send
   the message "sub cites [your name]" to
   [31]listserv@library.berkeley.edu, replacing "[your name]" with your
   name. To unsubscribe, send the message "unsub cites" to the same
   address.

References

   Visible links
   1. LYNXIMGMAP:http://sunsite/CurrentCites/2004/cc04.15.7.html#head
   2. http://roytennant.com/
   3. http://info.lib.uh.edu/cwb/bailey.htm
   4. http://iir.berkeley.edu/faculty/huwe/
   5. http://www.hooboy.com/
   6. http://leoklein.com/
   7. http://roytennant.com/
   8. http://ojr.org/ojr/workplace/1090395903.php
   9. http://ojr.org/
  10. http://www.hooboy.com/
  11. https://www.techsource.ala.org/rna.pl?section=ltr
  12. http://www.techsource.ala.org/
  13. http://roytennant.com/
  14. http://searchenginewatch.com/searchday/article.php/3384481
  15. http://searchenginewatch.com/
  16. http://www.hooboy.com/
  17. http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_6/huffaker/index.html
  18. http://www.firstmonday.org/
  19. http://iir.berkeley.edu/faculty/huwe/
  20. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july04/lavoie/07lavoie.html
  21. http://www.dlib.org/
  22. http://leoklein.com/
  23. http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20040721/01/
  24. http://www.the-scientist.com/
  25.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/39902.htm
  26. http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20040720/04
  27.
http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/headlines/news/article_04_07_06_en.html
  28. http://info.lib.uh.edu/cwb/bailey.htm
  29. http://www.HaworthPressInc.com/store/product.asp?sku=J123
  30. http://leoklein.com/
  31. mailto:listserv@library.berkeley.edu

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post