[13454] in Public-Access_Computer_Systems_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Current Cites July 2000

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (CITES Moderator)
Thu Aug 3 20:14:03 2000

Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2000 17:20:36 -0700
From: CITES Moderator <citeschk@LIBRARY.BERKELEY.EDU>
To: PACS-L@LISTSERV.UH.EDU
Errors-To: citeschk@library.berkeley.edu
Reply-To: cites@library.berkeley.edu
Message-Id: <Pine.OSF.4.10.10008021653250.8328-100000@library.berkeley.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII

                               Current Cites

                         Volume 11, no. 7, July 2000

                       Edited by Teri Andrews Rinne

            The Library, University of California, Berkeley, 94720
                              ISSN: 1060-2356 -
         http://sunsite.berkeley.edu/CurrentCites/2000/cc00.11.7.html

     Contributors: Terry Huwe, Michael Levy, Leslie Myrick, Jim
                  Ronningen, Lisa Rowlison, Roy Tennant

    Arms, William. "Automated Digital Libraries: How Effectively Can
    Computers Be Used for the Skilled Tasks of Professional
    Librarianship?" D-Lib Magazine 6(7/8)(July/August 2000)
    (http://www.dlib.org/dlib/july00/arms/07arms.html). - In Current Cites
    we don't just cite articles we agree with, we cite articles we think
    you should read. This one falls into the latter category. In it Arms
    (a computer scientist active in digital library development) posits a
    question that he then forgets to answer. But what "answer" he does
    provide is very disturbing. To begin with, he reduces the question to
    one of cost. That is, can automated digital libraries provide an
    "acceptable substitute" at a lower cost. Apparently they can, to
    someone who thinks Google provides better service than Inspec, as Arms
    claims. Unfortunately I do not have the space to refute Arms' opinion
    and unsubstantiated arguments that appear to suggest that automated
    digital libraries can perform most of the skilled tasks of
    professional librarianship. At least he seems to acknowledge that
    reference service is likely to remain too difficult for machines,
    although he relies on personal anecdotes when scholarly evidence such
    as that published by Bonnie Nardi is close at hand. For those of
    you who are librarians, read this piece closely. It largely depicts
    what computer scientists think of you, the libraries you have built
    and are building, and the value of human-constructed and maintained
    library collections and services. It is not a pretty sight. - RT

    Baker, Nicholson. "Deadline: The Author's Desperate Bid to Save
    America's Past" The New Yorker (July 24, 2000): 42-61. - Nicholson
    Baker is well-known to the library community for his 1994 and 1996
    articles in The New Yorker bemoaning the demise of the card catalog
    and taking to task the San Francisco Public Library for discarding
    books. He goes on the offensive once more with a quixotic attempt to
    save long-runs of American newspapers from being discarded after the
    process of microfilming. As with his other library pieces, Baker is no
    detached observer but a fully-fledged participant, actually forming
    his own non-profit organization, the American Newspaper Repository, in
    an attempt to save numerous sets of historical newspaper from being
    sold by the British Library. The piece highlights some important
    issues regarding the process of microfilming for preservation and
    archival purposes with Baker severely criticizing the library
    community for not doing enough to ensure the preservation of at least
    some hard copy runs of newspapers. He is particularly vexed at what he
    sees as the poor quality of much microfilming and what he views,
    rather unfairly, as the overblown claims of librarian administrators
    concerning issues of space and the degradation of much newsprint,
    especially from the 19th century. He correctly points out that with
    the demise of paper collections that companies such as Bell & Howell,
    which owns microfilm negatives for most large newspapers, has "a
    near-monopoly on the reproduction rights for the chief primary sources
    of twentieth-century history." As with all his articles the writing is
    of top quality, especially his description of a company in New Jersey,
    the Historic Newspaper archives, that sells newspapers to give as
    gifts for particular birth-dates. This article is sure to cause much
    debate in the library world. - ML

    Borgman, Christine L. _From Gutenberg to the Global Information
    Infrastructure: Access to Information in the Networked World_
    Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000. - Despite a rather unsatisfying title,
    Borgman has succeeded in writing the definitive text book for digital
    library courses. Since the author is a professor at the UCLA library
    school, and a visiting professor at Loughborough University in
    England, this comes as no surprise. As one expects of a textbook, it
    is an authoritative overview of the issues, with frequent references
    to the supporting literature. Don't expect to be able to run out and
    build digital library collections and services based on what you learn
    here, but do expect to have a thorough grounding in the field from a
    scholarly perspective. - RT

    _Guides to Quality in Visual Resource Imaging_ Council on Library
    and Information Resources, 2000 (http://www.rlg.org/visguides/). -
    Anyone digitizing visual resources owes it to their project to study
    the information at this site. Collected together in one location is
    some of the best advice on digital imaging from top-notch experts in
    the field. Practical information is offered on planning a project,
    selecting a scanner, factors affecting image quality, measuring
    quality of digital masters, and file formats for master files. This is
    not a static publication, but will be updated periodically to keep it
    up-to-date with current standards and best practices. An excellent
    resource from the Association of Research Libraries, the
    Digital Library Federation, and the Council on Library and
    Information Resources. - RT

    _LC21: A Digital Strategy for the Library of Congress_ Washington,
    DC: National Academy Press, 2000
    (http://www.nap.edu/books/0309071445/html/). - This report comprises
    the findings of a committee of the National Research Council that
    reviewed the Library of Congress' technology practices and
    initiatives. Although the report focuses on the Library of Congress,
    there is much here that can serve as useful advice for other
    libraries. Skip over the sections and chapters that focus directly on
    the LOC, and find the parts that deal more broadly with topics that
    impact (or will) all libraries. Specific chapters to pay particular
    attention to (at least in part) include the introductory chapter and
    those on collection development, preservation, and organization for
    access. - RT

    Miller, Paul. "Interoperability: What is it and Why Should I Want
    it?" Ariadne
    (24) (June 2000) (http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue24/interoperability/).
    - Interoperability between digital libraries is essential if library
    users are to be offered simple access to a wide variety of library
    content and services. Without it, library users must first discover
    where all the various digital library collections can be found, and
    then go to each one and search them individually. In this excellent
    overview, the interoperability expert for the United Kingdom's
    eLib Programme defines interoperability and describes all of its
    various dimensions in the digital library context. The web site that
    the author manages, Interoperability Focus
    (http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/interop-focus/) is also a good resource for
    further information. - RT

    The Secret Books
    (http://www.thesecretbooks.com/). - Okay, secret or not-so-secret
    digital bibliophiles: take a break from your monthly Current Cites
    reading list to visit this stunning flash- or dhtml-enhanced
    photographic interpretation of snippets of various of Borges' essays
    on books and libraries, including the ubiquitous "Library of Babel."
    Yes, on one plane this site serves as a glamorous advertisement to buy
    the photographer's physical book. But provocative photographic
    juxtapositions of old books with snakes, fruit, stone, voodoo candles,
    inscribed skulls and mirrors offer up a gorgeous statement on books
    and materiality in an ironically digital wrapper, as well as an
    elegant conversation between Borges' texts and Kernan's images. -
    LM

    Tennant, Roy. "Beg, Buy, Borrow, License or Steal" LJ Digital
    (July 15, 2000)
    (http://www.ljdigital.com/articles/infotech/digitallibraries/20000615_
    15167.asp) - For librarians building digital libraries in this age of
    the digital incunabulum, juggling the market (should we buy? license?
    scan an out-of-copyright version of? this or that very expensive
    digital publication) can make one's head spin. Our Current Cites
    colleague Roy Tennant offers some judicious advice stemming from his
    experience and expertise as the SunSITE manager at UC Berkeley, and
    now as eScholarship Web & Services Manager at the California Digital
    Library. Knowing one's options -- and orchestrating the right mix --
    are the key. Roy outlines the strengths of each of the means he
    suggests in his title and provides a sidebar of useful links to help
    to get your head on straight. - LM

    Young, Jeffrey R. "A Historian Presents the Civil War, Online and
    Unfiltered by Historians" NY Times Technology Circuits
    (http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/00/06/circuits/articles/29ayer.ht
    ml) - The Valley of the Shadow project
    (http://valley.vcdh.virginia.edu) has been on the web for nearly five
    years, but as truly one of the most stunning digital archive success
    stories going, it garners renewed mention by Young on the eve of the
    release of the CD-ROM version. Under the aegis of the University of
    Virginia and the leadership of history professor Edward L. Ayers, the
    archive contains some 5000 pages of digitized photographs, newspaper
    articles, records, wills, census figures, and diaries covering the
    years 1857 to 1870 and issuing from two representative counties, one
    in Pennsylvania and one in Virginia. In his article, Young
    characterizes it as a "do-it-yourself history kit," where users can
    let their own research into the sources lead them to their own
    conclusions. With the boon of database searching, modern users can
    find connections which might have taken pre-Valley researchers an
    entire sabbatical to cobble together. And, as Young points out, the
    sources themselves take a refreshingly wide cross-section, from a
    slave woman's letter to her husband on her impending sale to traders,
    to the insipid diary entries of an upper-class teenager. The CD-ROM
    version, due out next month, is being touted as an interactive hybrid
    of multimedia and scholarship, or an "interactive archive." - LM


Current Cites 11(7) (July 2000) ISSN: 1060-2356
Copyright  2000 by the Library, University of California,
Berkeley. All rights reserved.

Copying is permitted for noncommercial use by computerized bulletin
board/conference systems, individual scholars, and
libraries. Libraries are authorized to add the journal to their
collections at no cost. This message must appear on copied
material. All commercial use requires permission from the editor.
All product names are trademarks or registered trade marks
of their respective holders. Mention of a product in this
publication does not necessarily imply endorsement of the product.
To subscribe to the Current Cites distribution list, send the
message "sub cites [your name]" to listserv@library.berkeley.edu,
replacing "[your name]" with your name. To unsubscribe, send the
message "unsub cites" to the same address. Editor: Teri
Andrews Rinne, trinne@library.berkeley.edu.

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post