[11760] in Public-Access_Computer_Systems_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Will We Lose 1 Million Books Today??

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Michael S. Hart)
Wed Oct 22 20:02:10 1997

Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 17:58:47 -0500
From: "Michael S. Hart" <hart@prairienet.org>
To: PACS-L@LISTSERV.UH.EDU
Reply-To: Public-Access Computer Systems Forum <PACS-L@LISTSERV.UH.EDU>

----------------------------Original message----------------------------

If these bills are passed, it will mean the elimination of 1 million
books from the Public Domain, and another step in creating a virtual
"Land of the Information Rich."

Copyrights will be extended to cover nearly all information, and for
periods longer than our unborn childen can expect to live in a whole
human lifetime, on the average.

Please call your congresspeople with your opinions.  You can find at
least most of them in Project Gutenberg's 251st Etext:

United States Congressional Address Book, 1995    [usconxxx.xxx] 251


Thanks!!

Michael S. Hart
[hart@pobox.com]
Project Gutenberg
Executive Director
Internet User ~#100



---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 97 15:48:48 EDT
From: John Mark Ockerbloom <spok+@gs1.sp.cs.cmu.edu>

(Message class3:459)
Return-Path: <spok+@GS1.SP.cs.cmu.edu>
Received: from GS1.SP.CS.CMU.EDU by ux4.sp.cs.cmu.edu id aa18944;
          21 Oct 97 15:40 EDT
To: spok+bookpeople@cs.cmu.edu
Subject: Action alert: Threats to the public domain
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 97 15:40:36 EDT
From: John Mark Ockerbloom <spok+@gs1.sp.cs.cmu.edu>
Sender: spok+@gs1.sp.cs.cmu.edu

Two bills have been recently introduced in Congress that would seriously
weaken the public domain, the source of the majority of the books now
available on-line free of charge.  Both appear to be placed on a
"fast track", so stopping them will require rapid action.

The first is a revision to the copyright law that would extend all
copyrights now in force for an additional 20 years (long past the lifetimes
of the authors that copyright was designed to encourage).  This would
keep older works out of the public domain for nearly a century after
publication.

Copyright extension bills have been proposed for the last couple of years,
and have generally not gotten past the subcommittee hearings stage.
However, this one has apparently already passed through the subcommittee
without hearing, and is now in front of the full House Judiciary Committee,
with a nearly identical bill now in the Senate as well.  For full
information on the bill, why it's harmful, and what can be done to stop it,
see Professor Dennis Karjala's page, at

  http://www.public.asu.edu/~dkarjala/

The second bill is a "database protection bill" being pushed by a few
big database companies to put certain public domain materials
under intellectual property controls.  Unlike the bill above, which
would simply freeze the public domain for at least 20 years, this would
effectively *remove* material already belonging to the public from
the public domain.  It would take away a right that the public has
had up till this time to freely use factual information.  This too
could seriously hurt the dissemination of knowledge.
A critical report on the bill, including the full text of the bill,
can be found in a Hyperlaw report at

  http://www.essential.org/listproc/upd-discuss/msg00599.html

(Thanks to Michael Hart of Project Gutenberg for forwarding me that report!)

This information has also been placed on the News section of the On-Line
Books Page, and on a new sub-page we've started for resources on free
speech, fair use, and the public domain.  I'd love to hear about any
links that would be useful to include on the latter page.

John
--------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent via the Book People mailing list.
Posting address: spok+bookpeople@cs.cmu.edu
Admin. address:  spok+bookpeople-request@cs.cmu.edu
Charter:         http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~spok/bookpeople.html

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post