[11331] in Public-Access_Computer_Systems_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Resisting the fall of democracy

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vigdor Schreibman - FINS)
Tue May 27 20:22:59 1997

Date: Tue, 27 May 1997 15:12:38 -0500
From: Vigdor Schreibman - FINS <fins@access.digex.net>
To: PACS-L@LISTSERV.UH.EDU
Reply-To: Public-Access Computer Systems Forum <PACS-L@LISTSERV.UH.EDU>

----------------------------Original message----------------------------

----------------Original Message Posted in Multiple Lists-----------------
-------Republication is Authorized Only When Message is Kept Intact-------

FINS: Communicating the Emerging Philosophy of The Information Age
FEDERAL INFORMATION NEWS SYNDICATE
Vol V, Issue No. 10 (162 lines)                                May 26, 1997


CLOSING THE "VALUES-GAP":
Resisting the fall of democracy
By Vigdor Schreibman

The destructive unfolding situation
-----------------------------------

                 "We the People," collectively bear responsibility for
               democracy in America.  There is no appeal to a higher
               authority.  When laws and institutions do not go hand in hand
               with the "progress of the human mind," and also fail to, "keep
               pace with the times," a nation-state just begins to regress
               and disintegrate.  That's what the citizens of ancient Rome,
               who brought the world an advanced civilization in some ways
               superior to the post-modern one, yet learned during little
               more than four centuries of its existence (27 b.c.-a.d. 395).
               That's what Mr. Jefferson tried to tell the First Americans,
               which this generation of citizens, looking deeply into each
               other's eyes, must also learn to recognize.

                 Roman infrastructure, which did not adequately connect the
               parts of the empire with its great core, was fatal to Rome.
               The present technological civilization holds the seeds of its
               own destruction.  Despite the rhetorical promise that every
               individual may have equal access, it places a premium on
               communications that secure large investor preferences. They
               own the pipes, and now also much of the content, to assure
               maximum rents and also that no communications or political
               agenda adverse to their own interests can prosper.  This is
               the so-called "Golden Rule," of investor politics, designed to
               defeat the sovereign democratic powers of the people.

                 Moreover, the next stage of this disastrous process has
               already been set in motion by the Clinton administration, with
               the help of Republican friends in Congress.  They are now
               attempting by insidious machinations to destroy the
               information role of Congress.  This is the lifeblood of
               democracy, under which agencies of the US Government are
               required by law [44 USC sec. 1902], to make available to the
               people free of charge all government publications through the
               Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP).

                 It was disclosed in an estimate by the Superintendent of
               Documents (SOD), presented last Thursday, May 22, at a hearing
               of the Senate Committee on Rules and Administration, that
               "more than 50 percent of all tangible Government information
               products are not being made available to the Federal
               Depository Library Program."  This includes "about 55,000
               scientific and technical documents and reports which are
               neither printed through GPO nor furnished by the issuing
               agencies to the FDLP as required by law."

                 Agencies are unlawfully seizing upon these "fugitive"
               publications as potential sources of additional agency
               revenue, establishing exclusive arrangements with private
               sector entities so that the latter pay for publication costs.
               Agencies also allow those private publishers to place
               copyright or copyright-like restrictions on the products
               involved in such agreements, the SOD said.

                 Those copyright-like restrictions takes various forms,
               according to Ronald G. Dunn, President of the Information
               Industry Association (IIA).  These were described by the IIA,
               in an email message sent to FINS, May 8:
                    1.   Substantial initial licensing fees that exceed the
                         actual cost of dissemination
                    2.   Ongoing royalty/usage charges
                    3.   Restrictions on re-use, e.g., no copying, no
                         redistribution
                    4.   Higher fees for those wishing to redistribute data

                 Agencies are also attempting to engage in printing
               activities through private sources other than the GPO, in
               violation of law which explicitly prohibits any agency to use
               appropriated funds for printing unless this is done by or
               through the GPO [44 USC sec 501].  For example, Sen. Wendell
               H. Ford (D-Ky), informed members at the May 8 hearing, that
               the National Institute of Standards and Technology, recently
               solicited private bids for a $5,000,000 printing contract
               [Solicitation #52SBNS7C1031], for printing needs of the
               National Technical Information Service, which were being
               arranged on behalf of various agencies.  They intended to pay
               for this contract with the use appropriated funds, in direct
               violation of the Congressional prohibition.

                 Officials of the Clinton administration were called to
               testify at the hearings of May 8 and 22, to explain this
               extensive pattern of non-compliance and what was being done to
               correct the situation.  Included (among others) were: Sally
               Katzen, Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory
               Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (May 8); Henry J.
               Gioia, senior Management Analyst, Office of the Director of
               Administration and Management, Office of the Secretary of
               Defense; and Garry R. Bachula, Deputy Under Secretary for
               Technology Administration, Department of Commerce (May 22).

                 These officials played dumb or shrugged off the questions
               and complaints of the inquiring Senators.  They even tried to
               deny the facts when confronted with documents, which directly
               contradicted their testimony.  For example, when confronted
               with their own internal documents showing their intent to
               engage in non-compliance of the printing limitations, by
               advertising for agency printing contracts, Gioia claimed that
               his agency did not intend to do what the document stated.

                 Similarly, the Office of Legal Counsel, US Department of
               Justice, urged agencies to violate the statutory printing
               prohibition, in an opinion letter issued May 16, 1996,
               claiming that the prohibition was unconstitutional.  The
               Constitution and laws of the United States, are not subject to
               unilateral veto by the OLC. No Court order was issued, nor was
               any attempt made to secure one by the DOJ, perhaps, because
               the claim is nothing but a hot air balloon [Fins-NC5-08].

New voluntary organizations (NVOs)
----------------------------------

                 The infrastructure of the "Golden Rule," which burdens the
               people with incompetent public officials, and is leading to
               the fall of democracy itself must be resisted.  For this
               purpose there should be established an artful generation of
               new voluntary organizations (NVOs), with the mission of
               encouraging and facilitating a new foundation for sustainable
               democracy. The NVOs could be funded by the citizenry, a few
               dollars from each of the many who are threatened, to resist
               the few who would undermine democracy.

                 These NVOs could shape their own, citizen controlled
               alternative media.  The people could, thereby, speak
               collectively, coherently, and directly to each other, in
               groups, at farmers markets, in schools, libraries, community
               centers, churches, union halls, and homes, in any viable mode
               and wherever the people may conduct their affairs.

                 Most important, the NVOs could be organized in collaboration
               with social systems designers, group process facilitators,
               and other vital civic organizations.  They could, thereby,
               build the capacity to design a desirable future and promote
               the exercise of the collective will of the people, which are
               essential to realize a sustainable democracy.  Nothing is more
               important, to keep pace with these times.

============================================================================
JOIN A 21st-CENTURY PROJECT: TO UNCOVER THE COLLECTIVE WISDOM OF THE PEOPLE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GET 24 issues of your own email copy of Fins News Columns + Special Reports
+ Fins Information Age Lib + A people science and dialogue: Now only $12.95.
Subscription by check or money order. For details GET DEMOSOPHIA INITIATIVE.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Information News Syndicate, Vigdor Schreibman, Editor & Publisher,
18 - 9th Street NE #206, Washington, DC 20002-6042.  Copyright 1997 FINS.
Internet: fins@access.digex.net.  Browse Fins Information Age Library at the
inforM system of the University of Maryland HTTP://www.inform.umd.edu/FINS/.
============================================================================

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post