[11198] in Public-Access_Computer_Systems_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

FINS

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Public-Access Computer Systems For)
Tue Apr 8 21:33:04 1997

Date: Tue, 08 Apr 1997 13:47:37 -0500 (CDT)
From: Public-Access Computer Systems Forum <LIBPACS@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list PACS-L <PACS-L@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU>
Reply-To: Public-Access Computer Systems Forum <PACS-L@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU>

1 Message; 122 Lines
*-----

From: Vigdor Schreibman - FINS <fins@access.digex.net>
Subject: The People--a fool

-------Republication is Authorized Only When Message is Kept Intact-------

FINS: Communicating the Emerging Philosophy of The Information Age
FEDERAL INFORMATION NEWS SYNDICATE
Vol V, Issue No. 7 (120 lines)                                April 7, 1997
CLOSING THE "VALUES-GAP":
The People--a fool
By Vigdor Schreibman

                 Half-century into the reality of the information/knowledge
               age, with minds still filled with the wondrous vision of
               possibilities, one must, nevertheless, conclude that this
               experiment is--for the People--a profound disaster.

                 It is a bizarre information/knowledge age, in which the
               organization of knowledge itself, remains stuck--without any
               meaningful improvement.  The traditional Library Science model
               key topic index is largely where it was half-century ago at
               the beginning of the post-modern period--in a grand muddle.

                 This is the lessons, I draw, in "KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION FOR
               BETTERMENT OF HUMANKIND," a 7000 word article, written for a
               special edition of Systems- Transdyscyplinary Journal of the
               Polish Systems Society released online March 30. Republication
               rights to the article have been granted to the International
               Federation of Library Associations (IFLA), Universal Dataflow
               and Telecommunications Core Programme (IFLA UDT Occasional
               Paper), at the request of Terry Kuny, IFLANET Administration.

                 However, the period has been a boon to the super rich, who
               in the last 15 years or so have doubled their share of wealth
               and income through the devices of, "downsizing," "clean
               engineering," "restructuring," and "globalization." Government
               has also contributed to corporate welfare during the same
               period, with almost a third of a trillion dollars of
               appropriated funds for information technology, which has been
               "thrown away," without any improvement in government service.

                 With the massive wealth "mined" out of the economic
               marketplace and public treasury, State chartered corporations
               have unfairly subverted the political marketplace to severely
               undermine the sovereign democratic powers of the People.

                 What we have found on the Net is chaos, rendering--the
               People--a fool.  Librarians are fretting over the strategies
               for adaptation, fearful that Constitutional resistance to
               massive pollution of the marketplace of ideas will be labeled
               censorship.  When Robert Finch sent a message to the Public
               Library discussion list <publib-net@sunsite.berkeley.EDU>,
               April 4, brilliantly (I thought) urging resistance to the
               demand that they now, "defend the worst along with the best,"
               there was silence in response. Public interest organizations
               are sulking over the collapse of public confidence in their
               pathetic leadership.  They are willing to do just about
               anything to reach the people, but not by working to empower
               the people to take control of their own destiny.

                 Democratic and Republican loyalists are doing their best to
               explain in patient terms why everything is nice.  Last week
               Public-Access Computer Systems Forum <PACS-L@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU>,
               featured Jim Warren and Ridley Kessler doing a loving slow
               dance to subtly avoid the real issues that their super rich
               clients would prefer to make undiscussable.  It was priceless!

                 Meanwhile, Federal and local police are working, "to keep
               poor people in their place," as Mario Cuomo observed, flush
               with the success of increasing the population of American
               prisons by 100% during the past decade.  They are now trying
               to keep close watch on the growing class war against the
               technological civilization, which is following the central
               thesis of the Unabomber.  Trial of the Oklahoma bomber, only
               exacerbates this concern, since it is obvious that the
               defendant is no "mad bomber," but appears to be one very angry
               citizen aggrieved by Ruby Ridge and the Branch Davidian, Waco
               Holocaust, much like many others Americans angered by an array
               of harsh and inequitable conditions.

                 The secret to sustaining social peace in a democracy is in
               facilitating the collective exercise of democratic power
               through a technique for democracy or people science, which is
               now available [Fins-PS-01].  Corporations can be expected to
               act in their own interests.  But what about public interest
               organizations?

                 In response to my denunciation of the cowardness and
               lethargy of public interest organizations, one advocate
               observed, "I think I agree with this, *but* what is it that
               you are advocating???  To coin a phrase, What Is To Be Done?"
               [Peter Franck, San Francisco, CA  National Lawyer's Guild
               Committee on Democratic Communications, Cultural Environmental
               discussion list, Apr 5]. Peter Franck's question underscores
               the tragic/comic situation.  There is frustration that no one
               seems to hear anything that is not in resonance with their own
               empowerment.  I have addressed the question raised by Franck
               for years, lately with the explicit support of renown scholars
               and practitioners of people science, but without positive
               response from the public interest community, no probing
               exploration, no meaningful dialogue, no nada!

                 What is to be done, indeed.  When I suggest once again last
               week that public interest organizations should creatively
               adapt to the crisis of democracy by working to democratically
               empower the people, the discussion stopped dead in its tracks.

============================================================================
JOIN A 21st-CENTURY PROJECT: TO UNCOVER THE COLLECTIVE WISDOM OF THE PEOPLE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GET 24 issues of your own email copy of Fins News Columns + Special Reports
+ Fins Information Age Lib + A people science and dialogue: Now only $12.95.
Subscription by check or money order. For details GET DEMOSOPHIA INITIATIVE.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Information News Syndicate, Vigdor Schreibman, Editor & Publisher,
18 - 9th Street NE #206, Washington, DC 20002-6042.  Copyright 1997 FINS.
Internet: fins@access.digex.net.  Browse Fins Information Age Library at the
inforM system of the University of Maryland HTTP://www.inform.umd.edu/FINS/.
============================================================================

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post