[10947] in Public-Access_Computer_Systems_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Shifting out of chaos toward wisdom

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vigdor Schreibman - FINS)
Mon Jan 6 21:18:20 1997

Date: Mon, 06 Jan 1997 17:31:59 -0600 (CST)
From: Vigdor Schreibman - FINS <fins@access.digex.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list PACS-L <PACS-L@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU>
Reply-To: Public-Access Computer Systems Forum <PACS-L@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU>

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
----------------Original Message Posted in Multiple Lists-----------------
-------Republication is Authorized Only When Message is Kept Intact-------

FINS: Communicating the Emerging Philosophy of The Information Age
FEDERAL INFORMATION NEWS SYNDICATE
Vol V, Issue No. 1 (162 lines)                              January 6, 1997


CLOSING THE "VALUES-GAP":
Shifting out of chaos toward wisdom
By Vigdor Schreibman

                 In the Republican form of Government guaranteed by the
               United States to every State in the Union, under US CONST.
               art. IV, sec. 4, the Supreme Court has ruled, "all power
               derives from the people," _City of Eastlake v. Forest City_,
               426 US 668, 672 (1976).  Through this scheme of government,
               citizens have two basic alternatives of focus for their power:
               (1) they can delegate it to representative instruments which
               they create, risking defeat of democracy at the hands of the
               people's representatives, who violate their responsibilities
               with impunity; or (2) they can reserve to themselves power to
               deal directly with legislative matters, risking domination of
               the crowd without guide or will or plan. These nasty realities
               compel strenuous pursuit of a better strategy for democracy.

                 Despite the claim that all men are born free, "In real
               life," writes Benjamin R. Barber, the Walt Whitman Professor
               of Political Science at Rutgers University, "children are born
               fragile, born needy, born ignorant, born unformed, born weak,
               born foolish, born dependent--born in chains."  Continuing, in
               Harper's Magazine (Nov 1993), Barber writes:
                    We acquire our freedom over time, if at all.  Embedded in
                    families, clans, communities, and nations, we must learn
                    to be free.  We may be natural consumers and born
                    narcissists, but citizens have to be made.

                  The promise of democracy is limited not solely by a lack of
               adequate democratic education.  Four classifications of
               constraints, which limit human achievement, have been
               described by Warfield (1994).  These include:
                    * species constraints (e.g., limited personal perspective
                      and understanding of individuals, and their limited
                      short-term ability to process information);
                    * situational constraints (e.g., communications channels
                      that offer state-created advantages to business
                      corporations, which disregards essential public goods);
                    * methodological constraints (e.g., philosophy of past-
                      futures planning, unilateral control over information);
                    * personal constraints (e.g., inadequate health care,
                      housing, and education; unemployment; and poverty).

                 Nevertheless, "By focusing specifically on means to weaken
               or eliminate aspects of these constraints, the opportunity for
               human achievement can be enhanced, often substantially,"
               Warfield states in, "A Science of Generic Design" 42-43 (Iowa
               State University Press, 1994).  The existing situation should
               not be viewed as an insurmountable barrier to progress but as
               an opportunity for human achievement carried out peacefully.
               This opportunity is not to be found, however, in the advocacy
               of interests, working the crowd by prejudice and hypnotism.

                  A call-to-action on, "A people science" (PS), seeking to
               overcome the constraints on human achievement, was recently
               issued by AN Christakis, a well regarded nuclear physicist and
               "Interactive Management" (IM) consultant [Fins-PS-01].  This
               proposal is founded on two decades of research development and
               testing in a variety of communities around the world, and now
               comprises a dynamic body of knowledge and experience based on
               a process of group organization and management to sustain the
               democratic mission.  A PS--strategy for democracy--was first
               anticipated by Mary P. Follett [Fins-PS-03], an organizational
               theorist of early 20th-century, recognized in the Harvard
               Business School classics as a "Prophet of Management" (1995).

                 What is special about PS is the systemic support, which is
               provided a community of citizens to improve their capacity in
               coping with two strongly coupled dimensions of the problematic
               existing situation, which must be confronted.  This includes:
               (a) overcoming the substantive complexity of the target of
               investigation; and (b) shifting out of the inherent weakness
               of chaotic individual self-expression toward interpersonal
               communications in harmony with other members of the community.

                  Many individuals, governed by narrow individualism, may
               resist shifting to a collective mode of communications. For
               example, a body of opinion arising from the broadly
               perpetrated fiction of an "independent" theory of law and
               economics, holds that the strength of the Internet lies in its
               chaos, and similarly, that "the strength of our liberty
               depends upon the chaos and cacophony of the unfettered speech
               the First Amendment protects," _ACLU v. Reno_, 929 F.Supp 824,
               865, 883 (D EDPa, 1996) (Dalzell, J., plurality opinion).

                 Freedom of expression, long constrained by the propaganda
               model of mass media (despite First Amendment prohibition of
               censorship by the State), clearly has exploded into unbridled
               chaos over the Net guided by narrow individualism.  However,
               the lack of disciplined communications by society is brewing
               "an intellectual and cultural disaster," Yale Professor of
               Computer Sciences, David Gelernter, stated in an interview in
               "Electric Minds," Nov 11, 1996. Meanwhile, rejecting chaos,
               the methodical use of computers by science has "outstripped
               our wildest dreams," Gelernter added [Fins-NC4-24]. Similarly,
               collective learning is increasingly the style of prosperous
               business corporations [See e.g., Ackoff, 1994; Senge, 1990].

                 The Internet (previously in the United States called the
               National Research and Education Network (NREN) program), was
               clearly not intended to be built as a tower of babble.  The
               primary purpose was to, "dramatically enhance the ability to
               collaborate among members of the research and education
               community," according to D. Allan Bromley, White House science
               advisor in the Bush administration [Fins-II-02, pp. 7-8]. Now
               drawing on the research of Pattakos (1995) and Banathy (1996),
               Christakis shows that communication of information between
               individuals cannot itself enable the people to exercise their
               democratic powers during a time of escalating complexity.
               Spiritual dialogue between a community of stakeholders is
               necessary, a process that results in "collective learning."

                 The Christakis call-to-action, envisions PS as an instrument
               to uncover the "wisdom of the people," which in the Greek
               language is called "demosophia."  Moreover, it is suggested
               that the trend toward demosophia "is inevitable."  This is due
               to the inexorable pressure for social action to overcome, "the
               inability of organizations and society as a whole to deal with
               the acute problems of today."  Responding to that pressure the
               Cyberspace Society carried out an experiment in collective
               inquiry during Oct to Dec 1996 [Fins-VT-01 to 47; Fins-CSP-01
               to 59].  This brief inquiry confirmed that willing netizens
               can readily shift out of chaotic self-expression toward more
               harmonious interpersonal communications.

                 FINS intends to support PS with a new subscription policy,
               dedicating a part of the price paid, to a "People Science
               Fund." A panel of sensitive and eminent trustees have been
               recruited to advise on use of the PS Fund for advancement of
               demosophia [Fins-PS-02].  Voluntary organizations, virtual
               community leaders, and public journalism, among others, will
               be enabled, thereby, to collaborate in managing the process of
               collective learning.  This project can help build a democratic
               Global Information Infrastructure (dGII) [Fins-CS-06].

                 Efforts to fill the Information Age with more fatuous glitz
               are unlikely to make useful the mammoth new capacity of global
               information systems. An alternative civil enterprise should be
               created, instead, to defeat social chaos with PS, and utilize
               cyberspace better to uphold the sovereign power of the people.

============================================================================
JOIN A 21st-CENTURY PROJECT: TO UNCOVER THE COLLECTIVE WISDOM OF THE PEOPLE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GET 24 issues of your own email copy of Fins News Columns + Special Reports
+ Fins Information Age Lib + A people science and dialogue: Now only $12.95.
For details and subscription form, send email: "GET DEMOSOPHIA INITIATIVE."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Information News Syndicate, Vigdor Schreibman, Editor & Publisher,
18 - 9th Street NE #206, Washington, DC 20002-6042.  Copyright 1997 FINS.
Internet: fins@access.digex.net.  Browse Fins Information Age Library at the
inforM system of the University of Maryland HTTP://www.inform.umd.edu/FINS/.
============================================================================

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post