[10744] in Public-Access_Computer_Systems_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

The Triumph of American Democracy

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vigdor Schreibman - FINS)
Mon Oct 21 21:13:28 1996

Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 18:03:05 -0500 (CDT)
From: Vigdor Schreibman - FINS <fins@access.digex.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list PACS-L <PACS-L@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU>
Reply-To: Public-Access Computer Systems Forum <PACS-L@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU>

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
----------------Original Message Posted in Multiple Lists-----------------
-------Republication is Authorized Only When Message is Kept Intact-------

FINS: Communicating the Emerging Philosophy of The Information Age
FEDERAL INFORMATION NEWS SYNDICATE
Vol IV, Issue No. 22 (122 lines)                           October 21, 1996


CLOSING THE "VALUES-GAP":
The Triumph of American Democracy
By Vigdor Schreibman

                 The pervasive breakdown of American democracy is visible
               everywhere, but difficult to grasp and pervasively denied
               because of the calamitous implications for the American myth.
               This is not the case for young Americans, however.  The
               youthful ideals of the youngest American voters do not even
               include democratic politics.  "Most citizens under forty-five
               have withdrawn from politics and, indeed, never entered that
               realm of American life," says William Greider, renown news
               reporter and author of "Who will Tell the People" (1992).

                 A "Democracy Teach-in" was proposed recently, to be held on
               University campuses around the country during mid-October,
               addressing the topic "CAN WE PURSUE DEMOCRACY AND SOCIAL
               JUSTICE WHEN CORPORATIONS ARE ALLOWED TO CONTROL SO MUCH
               WEALTH AND POWER?" [Fins-PaN-30]. A report emailed to FINS
               Sept 12 states, "In surveying the faculty on most campuses
               here and inquiring re: student interest, we are finding very
               few faculty willing to speak out in public, fewer who will do
               so on their own campuses and a basic lack of any student
               interest or activities on campuses (except in sports ...)."

                 It would be easy enough to dismiss the ambivalence and
               cynicism of voter dropouts except for the fact that their
               numbers are steadily increasing, particularly, among young
               voters who, at an overwhelming rate, do not vote and have no
               civil faith.  Scholars conclude that these young Americans are
               simply facing the reality that there is no rational purpose
               for them to participate in a rigged and lopsided political
               system.  There may be other explanations, but the bottom line
               is clear: when the next American generation becomes this
               nation's leaders, in the absence fundamental reform, there
               will remain not even the ancient dream of democracy.

                 In spite of their bleak survey, coordinators of the "Teach-
               In" expressed confidence that they will be successful in
               helping students democratically present and discuss the
               issues, which are "relevant to corporatization of education
               and democracy."  That task is formidable, perhaps, impossible
               to achieve without a structure, or "tools for democracy," to
               use Ralph Nader's phrase [Fins-NC4-16, Fins-CS-06].

                 During the past 15 years, or so, the structure for democracy
               has been relentlessly degraded.  In excess of $300 billion was
               "thrown away" on information technology by Congress, according
               to official reports, largely as a wasted subsidy to empower
               public officials and industry.  Public funds allocated for
               public information systems, such as the depository library
               program (DLP), which empowers Americans with information about
               the conduct of their Government have been cut, in real terms,
               by more than fifty percent.  Control over the dissemination of
               public information for the free use of the general public has
               also been lost to an epidemic of lawless "fugitive documents,"
               affecting, perhaps, as much as half of all public information,
               and by copyrighting public information for private gain.

                 Now comes the President with a surprising election eve gift
               for the people.  An "e-rate" has been proposed [Fins-TI-16].
               This could assure free "basic connectivity, transmission
               speed, and Internet access for the nation's schools and
               libraries."  The proposal requires approval by the Federal
               Communications Commission, Federal-State Joint Board on
               Universal Service.  Payment for this free public access, would
               include the costs, together with the profit industry may
               demand through "competitive bids." The total would be added to
               the amount otherwise paid by telephone ratepayers, under the
               "universal service" provisions of the Telecommunications Act
               of 1996 (47 USC sec 254), approved last Feb [Fins-NC4-03].

                 The primary success story of "tools for democracy," has been
               the Internet, which was realized not under the market system
               but free from profit pressures through global cooperation. The
               multi-billion dollar public investment was, nevertheless,
               privatized by the Clinton Administration.  But the rush to
               privatization was contrary to the long-term vision of an
               infrastructure "for broad support of the Nation's intellectual
               activity" (along with distinct general commercial use),
               offered by the White House Office of Science and Technology
               Policy in Bush Administration [Fins-II-02, para B.3].

                 The likely exorbitant cost of commercial control of the
               infrastructure is the least of the problems posed by these
               events.  Total private control over the images of reality,
               threatened by this structure [Fins-NC4-04], would sanction
               opportunistic information systems with a direct feed right
               into the schools and libraries of the nation.  This would
               likely lead to the most egregious excesses derived from the
               unprincipled expansion of market powers in the new media.

                 William Greider provocatively suggests in his book, cited at
               the outset that, "Americans are about to learn whether the
               American experiment was truly unique--capable of defying
               history--or simply another chapter in the rise and fall of
               muscular nation-states."  Put to a real test, the ultimate
               triumph of American democracy is dependent upon genuine
               dialogue.  A fierce commitment is required to carry this
               mission forward, without clarity of means or ends, save the
               vision of democracy adapted to invent a sustainable future.

============================================================================
ESTABLISHMENT OF A DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE--dNII Now!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GET 24 issues of your own email copy of Fins News Column + Special Reports
+ Fins Information Age Library + Internet Press Gallery Project, for $2.95.
Payment for subscription by check or CyberCash. Include your email address.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Information News Syndicate, Vigdor Schreibman, Editor & Publisher,
18 - 9th Street NE #206, Washington, DC 20002-6042.  Copyright 1996 FINS.
Internet: fins@access.digex.net.  Browse Fins Information Age Library at the
inforM system of the University of Maryland. HTTP: //www.inform.umd.edu:
8080/EdRes/Topic/CompResource/CompSoc/FINS/; Gopher to inform.umd.edu:
EdRes/Topic/CompResource/CompSoc/FINS/.
============================================================================

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post