[10595] in Public-Access_Computer_Systems_Forum

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

A Democracy Teach-In on the Net

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vigdor Schreibman - FINS)
Mon Sep 9 21:19:15 1996

Date: Mon, 09 Sep 1996 19:13:21 -0500 (CDT)
From: Vigdor Schreibman - FINS <fins@access.digex.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list PACS-L <PACS-L@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU>
Reply-To: Public-Access Computer Systems Forum <PACS-L@UHUPVM1.UH.EDU>

----------------------------Original message----------------------------
----------------Original Message Posted in Multiple Lists-----------------
-------Republication is Authorized Only When Message is Kept Intact-------

FINS: Communicating the Emerging Philosophy of The Information Age
FEDERAL INFORMATION NEWS SYNDICATE
Vol IV, Issue No. 19 (118 lines)                          September 9, 1996


CLOSING THE "VALUES-GAP":
A Democracy Teach-In on the Net
By Vigdor Schreibman

                 The very idea of "community" has become an oxymoron in a
               "free market" Capitalist economy managed under autocratic
               corporate power to maximize profit and the self-interests of
               global oligopolies.  Indeed, the currently emerging norm
               imposes, "subordination of the sovereign community of citizens
               to the international operation of post-industrial market
               forces,"  according to historian John Pocock.  This norm is
               reviewed in _Jihad vs. McWorld_ (1995), by Benjamin Barber,
               Whitman Professor of Political Science at Rutgers University.

                 Pocock asks whether the subordination of citizens to
               international market forces is a "good or bad step in the
               architecture of a post-modern politics"?  Barber responds,
               "No, not bad, disastrous."

                 Nevertheless, despite the disastrous disregard of paramount
               community interests by market forces, advocates of market
               Capitalism are now, ironically, taking up the cause of
               community networking.  I visited the Communet Conference list,
               last week, where the focus is on community freenets, which are
               in a dire financial situation.  I tried to discuss the causes
               of this financial distress with an individual known as "Donald
               Chan," and others such as Steve Cavrack and a cabal of market
               Capitalism supporters, who browse Communet these days.

                 For two decades most of the income gains taken out of the
               computer-information economy in the United States, "have gone
               to the richest 20 percent and most of that to the top 5
               percent," Robert Kutner reported in The New York Times, Labor
               Day 1995.  The national economy, and specially community
               interests, were undercut during the first six years of the
               Reagan Administration alone, by $2 trillion following the tax
               breaks for wealth Americans based on a "Rosy Scenario"
               fabricated by David Stockman.

                 When I offered commentary on these matters, on Communet,
               what ensued was a torrent of distortions, insults, and
               personal attacks on me.  My report on the $2 trillion
               budgetary error was denounced as the "ridiculous argument" of
               an economist that "missed the boat since communism collapsed."
               Instead, an attempt was made to explain the massive loss of
               public funds as "Money created by government and spent on
               useless programs."  It was also claimed that the super rich
               benefitted from this lost money only "in Vigdor mind."

                 The denial of reality with lies issued from the desks of
               corporate sycophants is easy.  A strenuous effort must by made
               by citizens, however, to confront these realities and find the
               means to overcome the appalling existing situation.

                 It is an unseemly exercise for community networkers to be
               sent out begging for funds urgently needed by freenets, while
               special corporate interests with colossal fortunes drawn from
               the US Treasury through corrupt political deals, assert their
               material powers in the subordination of citizens.  Public
               funding is the only viable and equitable support system for
               community networks.  The establishment of the Internet
               required billions of dollars in taxpayer funds and many years
               of creative work by thousands of non-profit groups and
               institutions.  The case for dedication of these unique public
               resources to the corporate profit race, while disregarding
               paramount public needs, does not exist.

                 After a five day flame war on Communet, bashing these issues
               back and forth, I was delighted to finally receive another,
               calm and rational viewpoint from a scholar at the University
               of Hawaii.  This individual observed, "There is a strong
               public case for low cost public, non-profit use of these
               networks and maybe that is a role we community net advocates
               should be assuming." He also counseled Vigdor: "Gently, gently
               and persistently drive the point home with facts, facts set
               beside each other to highlight the truth and the lie."

                 Citizens can surely drive the point home with the power they
               command over the Internet.  Moreover, one can take such action
               in collaboration with the, "Democracy Teach-In," which is now
               scheduled to be held Oct 13-19, at schools and colleges, and
               other civic forums across the country [Fins-PaN-30].  The
               "Democracy Teach-In," will address this basic question:

                    "CAN WE PURSUE DEMOCRACY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE WHEN
                    CORPORATIONS ARE ALLOWED TO CONTROL SO MUCH POWER AND
                    WEALTH?"

                 Each participant in the "Democracy Teach-In," will answer
               that question in ways, which are most fitting in terms of
               their own distinct needs. Community networkers can "make the
               public case for low cost public, non-profit use of these
               networks." Our own proposal for "A Multi-Channel National
               Information Infrastructure" (MC-NII), can be browsed at Fins
               Information Age Library [Fins-CS-06].

============================================================================
*THE PENNY PRESS AND CITIZEN-BASED JOURNALISM IS RETURNING WITH A VENGEANCE*
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
GET 24 issues of your own email copy of Fins News Column + Special Reports
+ Fins Information Age Library + Internet Press Gallery Project, for $2.95.
Payment for subscription by check or money order. Include your email address.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Information News Syndicate, Vigdor Schreibman, Editor & Publisher,
18 - 9th Street NE #206, Washington, DC 20002-6042.  Copyright 1996 FINS.
Internet: fins@access.digex.net.  Browse Fins Information Age Library at the
inforM system of the University of Maryland. HTTP: //www.inform.umd.edu:
8080/EdRes/Topic/CompResource/CompSoc/FINS/; Gopher to inform.umd.edu:
EdRes/Topic/CompResource/CompSoc/FINS/.
============================================================================

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post