[586] in Humor

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

HUMOR (classic): Improving English spelling

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew A. Bennett)
Sat Dec 3 22:26:54 1994

To: humor@MIT.EDU
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 1994 22:24:20 EST
From: "Andrew A. Bennett" <abennett@MIT.EDU>


Date: Fri, 2 Dec 94 13:14:56 PST
From: Connie_Kleinjans@Novell.COM (Connie Kleinjans)
Subject: HUMOR REVIVAL: Improving English spelling

Another oldie but goodie ...

<forwards deleted>

    Having chosen English as the preferred language in the EEC, the European
    Parliament has commissioned a feasibility study in ways of improving
    efficiency in communications between Government departments.

    European officials have often pointed out that English spelling is
    unnecessarily difficult - for example, cough, plough, rough, through and
    thorough. What is clearly needed is a phased programme of changes to
    iron out these anomalies. The programme would, of course, be
    administered by a committee staff at top level by participating nations.

    In the first year, for example, the committee would suggest using 's'
    instead of the soft 'c'. Sertainly, sivil servants in all sities would
    resieve this news with joy. Then the hard 'c' could be replaced by 'k'
    sinse both letters are pronounsed alike. Not only would this klear up
    konfusion in the minds of klerikal workers, but typewriters kould be
    made with one less letter.

    There would be growing enthusiasm when in the sekond year, it kould be
    announsed that the troublesome 'ph' would henseforth be written 'f'.
    This would make words like 'fotograf' twenty per sent shorter in print.

    In the third year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be expekted
    to reash the stage where more komplikated shanges are possible.
    Governments would enkourage the removal of double letters which have
    always been a deterent to akurate speling.

    We would al agre that the horible mes of silent 'e's in the languag is
    disgrasful. Therefor we kould drop thes and kontinu to read and writ as
    though nothing had hapend. By this tim it would be four years sins the
    skem began and peopl would be reseptive to steps sutsh as replasing 'th'
    by 'z'. Perhaps zen ze funktion of 'w' kould be taken on by 'v', vitsh
    is, after al, half a 'w'. Shortly after zis, ze unesesary 'o kould be
    dropd from words kontaining 'ou'. Similar arguments vud of kors be aplid
    to ozer kombinations of leters.

    Kontinuing zis proses yer after yer, ve vud eventuli hav a reli sensibl
    riten styl. After tventi yers zer vud be no mor trubls, difikultis and
    evrivun vud find it ezi tu understand ech ozer. Ze drems of ze Guvermnt
    vud finali hav kum tru.



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post