[504] in Humor

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

HUMOR: Fun with Science

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Andrew A. Bennett)
Thu Oct 20 10:29:39 1994

To: humor@MIT.EDU
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 1994 10:09:54 EDT
From: "Andrew A. Bennett" <abennett@MIT.EDU>


Date: Tue, 18 Oct 1994 17:03:00 -0600 (MDT)
From: Espacionaute Spiff domine! <MATOSSIAN%ARIES@VAXF.Colorado.EDU>

If you want the pictures from the following report, get a machine on
the net with a Web browser and check out:
    http://cbi.tamucc.edu/~pmichaud/toast/

- ------- Forwarded Message

                       STRAWBERRY POP-TART BLOW-TORCHES                                          Last Updated: 19 August 1994
  Author

      Patrick R. Michaud, pmichaud@cbi.tamucc.edu
       Abstract

    Strawberry Pop Tarts may be a cheap and inexpensive source of
   incendiary devices. Toasters which fail to eject Pop Tarts cause the
   Pop Tarts to emit flames 10-18 inches in height.
  Introduction

    Last year, an article by well-known newspaper columnist Dave Barry
   noted that Kellogg's Strawberry Pop Tarts (SPTs) could be made to
   emit flames "like a blow torch" if left in a toaster too long. Given
   previous work in the field of food-entertainment (see Fun With Grapes
   - A Case Study), it was obvious that this was a new frontier that
   requires further exploration. The present work describes our
   independent verification and experience with SPT-based combustion.
  Materials Used

    Only two basic materials are needed to cause SPT-combustion: a
   (hopefully inexpensive) toaster and some Strawberry Pop Tarts (Figure
   1). In this work, the authors used Kellogg's Strawberry Pop Tarts
   with Real Smucker's Fruit. SPTs can be obtained either with or
   without frosting; the non-frosted variety were used for this
   experiment.
     Figure 1
   Figure 1. Toaster and Strawberry Pop Tarts
     In addition to the basic materials, a number of safety-related items
   were needed to conduct this experiment. First, a suitable location for
   the experiment was required, it being expected that the kitchen was
   not the appropriate place for blow-torching SPTs. The author's
   driveway was chosen as a suitable site. Second, an appropriate means
   for extinguishing the SPTs would be needed; a research assistant
   brought along some baking soda for the purpose.
  Experiment Preparation

    The toaster and SPT both had to be properly prepared for this
   experiment. In order to guarantee that the SPT would receive
   sufficient heat to begin combustion, the toaster was set to its
   highest setting and the lever was jammed in the "down" position using
   adhesive cellophane. A SPT was removed from the box and its protective
   packaging and carefully placed into the toaster slot (Figure 2).
     Figure 2
   Figure 2. Preparation of Toaster and SPT
     Next, the toaster and SPT were taken to the driveway, and an extension
   cord was arranged to provide power to the toaster. At this point, we
   were ready to begin the experiment.
     Figure 3
   Figure 3. Toaster Prepared for SPT combustion
  The Experiment and Observations

    The toaster was plugged in. First the toaster went through a normal
   "toasting" cycle (approximately 60 seconds), which more than
   thoroughly cooked the SPT (since the toaster was set to its darkest
   setting). By this point we could definitely detect a burnt SPT aroma.
   The toaster then attempted to eject the SPT, but was prevented from
   doing so by the adhesive cellophane. The toaster then began emitting
   loud rattling and buzzing noises due to its inability to eject the
   SPT.
     (At this point the researchers became somewhat concerned that the
   noise from the toaster would wake the neighbors and attract undue
   attention. However, we decided that we were already committed to the
   experiment and that the neighbors would be able to sacrifice some
   sleep in the name of science.)
     Soon thereafter, large amounts of smoke began pouring out of the
   toaster. The researchers noticed that some of the neighbors down the
   street were beginning to get a little curious, but the experiment
   proceeded nonetheless. Approximately 40 seconds later, small flames
   began licking their way out of the toaster. The flames steadily grew
   larger and larger until reaching a maximum height of about 18 inches
   above the top of the toaster. Figure 4 presents a time-series collage
   of the flames emitted from the SPT.
     Figure 4
   Figure 4. Time Series Photograph of Flaming SPT
     As the flames were reaching their maximum height, the toaster abruptly
   stopped making buzzing noises. We speculate that the flames had by
   this point shorted the electronics within the toaster. The toaster was
   quickly disconnected from the primary electrical source to avoid any
   potential damage to the author's house. At this point, the researchers
   also realized that the heat could inadvertently melt the adhesive
   cellophane and cause the flaming SPTs to suddenly eject from the
   toaster. Unfortunately, this did not occur. The flames continued for
   several minutes.
     At this point there was some slight concern that the flames might take
   considerable time to diminish. We then enlisted the help of a
   reluctant research assistant to sprinkle baking soda on the flames.
   (The reluctance was understandable given the potential for premature
   SPT ejection described in the above paragraph.) The baking soda
   quickly extinguished the flames and produced still further smoke
   (Figure 5a).
     Figure 5
   Figure 5. Extinguising the SPT
     Once the flames were extinguished, the researchers noted an
   unanticipated problem: what to do with the (now defunct) toaster and
   the spent SPT. It became obvious that the toaster could not be
   returned to the author's house due to both a continued potential fire
   hazard and the smell of burnt strawberries. In addition, it was noted
   that the toaster was still "too hot to handle," necessitating the use
   of a nearby garden hose to cool the toaster off. This is illustrated
   in Figure 5b. Finally it was decided to just leave the toaster by the
   curb for the sanitation experts to pick up the next morning (Figure
   6.)
     Figure 6
   Figure 6. Toaster Disposal
  Summary and Recommendations

    In summary, overcooking the SPT did produce a good size flame. The
   effect was not as pronounced as the researchers had hoped, but was
   satisfying nonetheless. The research assistant noted that the flames
   produced did appear to have some color variation. We believe that
   frosted SPTs may successfully produce even larger torches. Further
   research in this area is warranted.
     We did desire to repeat the experiment with the remaining five SPTs,
   but we could not do so because there were no more suitable toasters
   available for further experiments. In the future, we recommend that
   toasters be sold in six-packs to accomodate important SPT research.
   Instead, the remaining SPTs were sacrified over the course of the next
   several days in private, undocumented consumption experiments.
  Acknowledgements

    Special thanks to Jennifer "Svetlana" Reckard for her suggestions and
   proofreading of this work.
  Followup Comments

           _________________________________________________________________
      Patrick R. Michaud/pmichaud@cbi.tamucc.edu



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post