[93] in arla-drinkers
Re: permission denied
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Love)
Fri Jul 10 08:17:36 1998
From arla-drinkers-request@sundance.stacken.kth.se Fri Jul 10 12:17:35 1998
Return-Path: <arla-drinkers-request@sundance.stacken.kth.se>
Delivered-To: arla-drinkers-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 7520 invoked from network); 10 Jul 1998 12:17:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sundance.stacken.kth.se) (130.237.234.41)
by bloom-picayune.mit.edu with SMTP; 10 Jul 1998 12:17:34 -0000
Received: from elixir.e.kth.se (sendmail@elixir.e.kth.se [130.237.48.5])
by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA06109
for <arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 14:09:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from zafir.e.kth.se (zafir.e.kth.se [130.237.48.6])
by elixir.e.kth.se (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA29204;
Fri, 10 Jul 1998 14:09:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (e96_lho@localhost) by zafir.e.kth.se (8.8.7/8.6.6) id OAA32570; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 14:09:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Sender: e96_lho@elixir.e.kth.se
To: wwshen@engin.umich.edu
Cc: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>, arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Subject: Re: permission denied
References: <Pine.SOL.3.96.980709114034.3849A-100000@red.engin.umich.edu>
From: Love <lha@stacken.kth.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: 10 Jul 1998 14:09:51 +0200
In-Reply-To: wwshen@engin.umich.edu's message of Thu, 9 Jul 1998 11:50:30 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <yxb23ec9aovk.fsf@zafir.e.kth.se>
Lines: 45
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.3/Emacs 19.34
wwshen@engin.umich.edu writes:
> I loaded arla into the kernel, without Transarc AFS. I typed demsg
> and get the following kernel messages:
Does it work without tramsarc afs ?
> Aperture driver for XFree86 version 1.6
> DDB symbols added: 48852 bytes
> Loading mod...
> done installing cdev !
> Char device number 30
> syscall 210
> DDB symbols added: 139068 bytes
>
> So it seems like arla is using system call 210. Does it conflict with
> Transarc AFS?
For NetBSD syscall 210 (the first lkm syscall) is used, xfs will take
the first free one.
What syscall does xfs report if you load tramsarc afs first ?
What will happen is you load xfs first and then afs.
Try to use tramsarc it will think
hummel:~/src/obj/arla/appl>./fs getcrypt
fs : Invalid argument; it is possible that [unknown path] is not in AFS.
while arlad/xfs say
natt:~$ fs getcrypt
not encrypted
> You have mentioned about version of krb4-980701, but I am running
> krb4-0.9.9 (are they different??). Is it possible for me to set up arla
> and krb4-0.9.9 to use different system call if they have conflict?
There are some small diffrences, the most importat for you is that is
that you can se the syscall w/o recompiling libkafs and all
programs that depend on it.
The file to change in kth-krb is lib/kafs/afssysdefs.h
Don't forget to recompile all programs link with libkafs.
Love
