| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
From owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se Tue May 11 12:47:20 1999 Return-Path: <owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se> Delivered-To: arla-drinkers-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu Received: (qmail 17079 invoked from network); 11 May 1999 12:47:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO sundance.stacken.kth.se) (130.237.234.41) by bloom-picayune.mit.edu with SMTP; 11 May 1999 12:47:20 -0000 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA02911 for arla-drinkers-list; Tue, 11 May 1999 14:41:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from assaris.sics.se (assaris.sics.se [193.10.66.108]) by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA02907 for <arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>; Tue, 11 May 1999 14:40:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from assar@localhost) by assaris.sics.se (8.9.1/8.7.3) id OAA00547; Tue, 11 May 1999 14:44:04 +0200 (CEST) From: assar@stacken.kth.se To: Helmut.Heller@lrz-muenchen.de Cc: arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se, lxs@mit.edu Subject: Re: arla on NeXTSTEP3.3/Intel References: <9904160954.AA01752@next.lrz-muenchen.de> <5lyaiyd42p.fsf@assaris.sics.se> <9905110852.AA17019@next.lrz-muenchen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.68) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: 11 May 1999 14:44:03 +0200 In-Reply-To: Helmut Heller's message of "Tue, 11 May 1999 10:52:08 +0200" Message-ID: <5ln1zbrd2k.fsf@assaris.sics.se> Lines: 29 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se Precedence: bulk Helmut Heller <Helmut.Heller@lrz-muenchen.de> writes: > Well, as a matter of fact, I *do* have a working X11 (this is > available as shareware), but my X11 does not have > IceConnectionNumber() and other symbols, so the linking fails. So this > is a more local thing, nothing to include in a general config file. But we never call IceConnectionNumber so I don't see why it should matter. So, does configure thinks you have X11, right? What does fail then when building amon? > > Ah, you don't have a getcwd? Added that to acconfig.h. > Well, I do have one, but only under POSIX. From the man page: Which probably means that it'll be found now that we give -posix to cc. > > > #define HAVE_SSIZE_T 1 > > > > And configure doesn't find ssize_t. Do you have such a type? configure should test for ssize_t and if it doesn't exist it should define it to int. Can you find out why this is not working? > I am willing to give the kernel stuff a try, but I will start from > your newest, fresh sources (including the above changes). Did you put > them up for downloading already? Where? Not yet, but there will be a 0.24 soon. /assar
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |