[340] in arla-drinkers

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: @sys in /afs directory on arla-0.13 works ?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jon S. Stumpf)
Wed Oct 21 22:07:34 1998

From owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se Thu Oct 22 02:07:33 1998
Return-Path: <owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>
Delivered-To: arla-drinkers-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 14072 invoked from network); 22 Oct 1998 02:07:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sundance.stacken.kth.se) (130.237.234.41)
  by bloom-picayune.mit.edu with SMTP; 22 Oct 1998 02:07:32 -0000
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
	by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA18477
	for arla-drinkers-list; Thu, 22 Oct 1998 04:02:40 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from mail.eclipse.net (root@mail.eclipse.net [207.207.192.13])
	by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA18470;
	Thu, 22 Oct 1998 04:02:34 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from mail.eclipse.net (wh2-188.eclipse.net [207.207.197.188])
	by mail.eclipse.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA13564;
	Wed, 21 Oct 1998 22:02:15 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <362E9203.FDD81FBC@mail.eclipse.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 1998 22:01:39 -0400
From: "Jon S. Stumpf" <jss@eclipse.net>
Reply-To: "Jon S. Stumpf" <jon.stumpf@acm.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (WinNT; U)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Magnus Ahltorp <map@stacken.kth.se>
CC: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" <allbery@kf8nh.apk.net>,
        arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Subject: Re: @sys in /afs directory on arla-0.13 works ?
References: <199810220116.VAA03530@hilfy.ece.cmu.edu> <lv1zpapids8.fsf@yakko.stacken.kth.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Precedence: bulk

Magnus Ahltorp wrote:

> > It may make more sense, but it's not what the rest of the AFS world is using
> > so it's a problem when talking to existing AFS installations with existing
> > linux-afs clients.
> >
> > FWIW we're using i386_linux2 for libc5, i386_linux2g currently for libc6,
> > but we're going to switch to i386_linux3 when the "official unofficial"
> > glibc linux-afs port comes out (it will use i386_linux3 for glibc2/libc6).
> > I'm not overly fond of it, but it's what I have to live with.
>
> Since arla has more support for linux compared to Transarc, and has
> not come out with the glibc port yet, arla was typically first.
>
> I'm not going to support more Transarc weirdnesses than
> neccessary. It's already enough. You don't have to live with it.

I tried to change this when I was a customer for 2.5 years and I tried while I was
a Transarc employee for 4 years.  Although I could get some consensus that it
didn't make sense to use "compiled OS", there was no real motivation to change
it.  As a customer, I forced the change of each particular OS to something that
made sense at each client.  This way, my infrastructure made sense to me and
anyone that was brought on to support it.

Since Transarc isn't inclined to promote the change, use arla to do it for them.

- jss

Open Source: If it's broke, fix it.






home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post