[1127] in arla-drinkers
Re: Odd bug in arla-0.27 on linux (i386) 2.2.12
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dr A V Le Blanc)
Mon Sep 6 05:07:37 1999
From owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se Mon Sep 06 09:07:37 1999
Return-Path: <owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>
Delivered-To: arla-drinkers-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 2243 invoked from network); 6 Sep 1999 09:07:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sundance.stacken.kth.se) (130.237.234.41)
by bloom-picayune.mit.edu with SMTP; 6 Sep 1999 09:07:36 -0000
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA01240
for arla-drinkers-list; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 10:58:58 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94])
by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA01235
for <arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 10:58:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from meissen.mcc.ac.uk ([130.88.203.42])
by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #3)
id 11Nuc1-0003nL-00; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 09:58:53 +0100
Received: (from zlsiial@localhost)
by meissen.mcc.ac.uk (8.7.6/8.8.4)
id JAA02738; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 09:58:52 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <19990906095852.A2734@afs.mcc.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 1999 09:58:52 +0100
From: Dr A V Le Blanc <LeBlanc@mcc.ac.uk>
To: Jeffrey Hutzelman <jhutz@cmu.edu>
Cc: arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Subject: Re: Odd bug in arla-0.27 on linux (i386) 2.2.12
Reply-To: Dr A V Le Blanc <LeBlanc@mcc.ac.uk>
References: <19990904185954.A1964@afs.mcc.ac.uk> <Pine.SOL.3.95L.990904141818.4071N-100000@afstest-1.fac.cs.cmu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.1i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.95L.990904141818.4071N-100000@afstest-1.fac.cs.cmu.edu>; from Jeffrey Hutzelman on Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 02:19:17PM -0400
Sender: owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Precedence: bulk
On Sat, Sep 04, 1999 at 02:19:17PM -0400, Jeffrey Hutzelman wrote:
> Hmm... I'm not sure if this should be obvious, but do you have any
> Kerberos tickets? You haven't been including the output of 'klist'...
No, I'm just doing a klog. Formerly I had klog as a script that
just did kauth (or kinit; I forget which), then afslog. Now I'm
using the new klog from arla, and it doesn't get Kerberos tickets.
Should it? If it doesn't, then shouldn't the other arla commands
work by cheking for tokens rather than tickets? Otherwise, shouldn't
the arla klog get kerberos tickets as well as tokens?
-- Owen
LeBlanc@mcc.ac.uk
