[1108] in arla-drinkers
Re: Arla 0.26/27pre4 vs. Linux 2.2.10 on SparcUltra 5
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tobias Grundmann)
Fri Aug 27 09:47:14 1999
From owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se Fri Aug 27 13:47:13 1999
Return-Path: <owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>
Delivered-To: arla-drinkers-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 16653 invoked from network); 27 Aug 1999 13:47:13 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sundance.stacken.kth.se) (130.237.234.41)
by bloom-picayune.mit.edu with SMTP; 27 Aug 1999 13:47:13 -0000
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA21668
for arla-drinkers-list; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:39:53 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from peanuts.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (peanuts.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.14.1])
by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA21664
for <arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:39:48 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from peanuts.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (carthy [134.2.14.21])
by peanuts.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.9.1/8.9.1/PEANUTS Revision: 1.1 $) with ESMTP id PAA23710;
Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:39:44 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199908271339.PAA23710@peanuts.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Cc: grundman@peanuts.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Subject: Re: Arla 0.26/27pre4 vs. Linux 2.2.10 on SparcUltra 5
In-reply-to: Your message of "27 Aug 1999 14:29:40 +0200."
<am7lmh2yq3.fsf@hummel.e.kth.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 15:41:04 +0200
From: Tobias Grundmann <grundman@Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De>
Sender: owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Precedence: bulk
lha@stacken.kth.se said:
> Try the following patch agaist 0.27 that will be out the door in any
> time soon. (hopfully today) The patch will not be i 0.27 since its
> untested.
> Love
thank you for sending the patch. Maybe I should have better mentioned again
that I tried the cvs version now where this patch is integrated already. Sorry.
The question is should I try to work on this or not? If there will be an
update soon this would be wasted time.
Well my machine panics in xfs_message_installdata after calling
xfs_fh_to_dentry which returns a defective dentry (IS_ERR(dentry)):
iterator kernel: XFS Panic: xfs_message_installdata failed to lookup
cache file = 00/01@, errno: -22
BTW: The file cache/00/01@ exists after the panic.
Tobias
PS: Oh and forget my statement about CACHEHANDLESIZE being too small. Just
confused ino_t with struct inode. Sometimes I should think a bit...
