[1105] in arla-drinkers
Re: Arla 0.26/27pre4 vs. Linux 2.2.10 on SparcUltra 5
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tobias Grundmann)
Fri Aug 27 07:33:06 1999
From owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se Fri Aug 27 11:33:06 1999
Return-Path: <owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>
Delivered-To: arla-drinkers-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 16320 invoked from network); 27 Aug 1999 11:33:05 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sundance.stacken.kth.se) (130.237.234.41)
by bloom-picayune.mit.edu with SMTP; 27 Aug 1999 11:33:05 -0000
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA17973
for arla-drinkers-list; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 13:21:04 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from peanuts.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (peanuts.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.14.1])
by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA17969;
Fri, 27 Aug 1999 13:20:55 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from peanuts.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (carthy [134.2.14.21])
by peanuts.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (8.9.1/8.9.1/PEANUTS Revision: 1.1 $) with ESMTP id NAA23372;
Fri, 27 Aug 1999 13:20:49 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-Id: <199908271120.NAA23372@peanuts.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Magnus Ahltorp <map@stacken.kth.se>
cc: Tobias Grundmann <grundman@Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De>,
arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Subject: Re: Arla 0.26/27pre4 vs. Linux 2.2.10 on SparcUltra 5
In-reply-to: Your message of "16 Aug 1999 16:13:03 +0200."
<ixdyafbhl00.fsf@turbot.pdc.kth.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 13:22:09 +0200
From: Tobias Grundmann <grundman@Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De>
Sender: owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Precedence: bulk
map@stacken.kth.se said:
> I haven't committed everything that is needed yet, but I will commit
> it any day now.
:)))
Hi,
after digging around a bit in the arla sources I think one of the
problems with this 32/64 bit issue is CACHEHANDLESIZE in xfs_message.h
which is to small. xfs_message.h is included in both the kernel module
and arlad stuff. Compiling one with 64 bit and the other one with 32
bit while this file_handle thing in xfs/linux/xfs_syscalls.c has a
plain unsigned int in it... then a memcpy in xfs_fh_to_dentry...
Well I wonder if its worth to investigate this further and do
eventually some real work on it. Will there be an update soon?
Tobias
