[1094] in arla-drinkers
Re: DCE/DFS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com)
Thu Aug 19 16:50:59 1999
From owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se Thu Aug 19 20:50:58 1999
Return-Path: <owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>
Delivered-To: arla-drinkers-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 9805 invoked from network); 19 Aug 1999 20:50:57 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sundance.stacken.kth.se) (130.237.234.41)
by bloom-picayune.mit.edu with SMTP; 19 Aug 1999 20:50:57 -0000
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA25192
for arla-drinkers-list; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 22:43:40 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from assaris.sics.se (assaris.sics.se [193.10.66.108])
by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA25186
for <arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 22:43:35 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from assar@localhost) by assaris.sics.se (8.9.3/8.7.3) id WAA24397; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 22:43:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com
Original-Sender: tgall@northrelay02.pok.ibm.com
Message-ID: <37BC684E.A8C46EC9@vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 20:25:50 +0000
Reply-To: tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com
Organization: IBM
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.10 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linas@us.ibm.com
CC: bernerus@cs.chalmers.se, linux-afs@mit.edu, arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Subject: Re: DCE/DFS
References: <852567D2.0057953F.00@d54mta01.raleigh.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 39
Sender: owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Precedence: bulk
linas@us.ibm.com wrote:
>
> I find the comments below a little surprising. From the linux-dce mailing list,
> its clear that it took a lot of work to get the 'free tog sources' ported,
> compiling, debugged on linux (mostly problems with dce-threads). As to a DFS
> port for linux, I think there is a version 0.01 which I understand is mostly an
> outline of work to be done. The lead on the dce port is gone, and the lead on
> the dfs port has been hired away and can't work on dfs due to conflict of
> interest.
Seems to me that DFS is a bit complicated and a linux port probably
isn't going
to happen anytime soon in the Open Source community short of a major
miracle.
That said at least transarc has a Linux AFS client, makes you wonder how
much clammoring at their door it would take to get a DFS client as well
for
linux.
Additionally given a choice between AFS and DFS, I must admit my
preference is
for AFS. To me AFS seems faster, and easier to use. I've heard that DFS
is much
easier on SysAdmins but that's only 2nd hand knowledge....
--
Hakuna Matata! |\ _,,,--,,_ ,)
Tom /,`.-'`' -, ;-;;'
|,4- ) )-,_ ) /\
import standard.disclaimer.*; |||| '---''(_/--' (_/-'
Tom Gall - Java Guy ____ "Where's the ka-boom? There was
IBM Rochester - Sapere aude \ /\ supposed to be an earth
(w) tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com \__/_/ shattering ka-boom!"
(h) tgall@uswest.net ------ -- Marvin Martian
"Here's to the crazy ones. The misfits. The rebels. The troublemakers.
The round pegs in the square holes. The ones who see things differently.
The ones that change the world!"
