[1089] in arla-drinkers
Re: Is Arla free for accessing IBM AFS servers?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (allbery@kf8nh.apk.net)
Wed Aug 18 18:23:16 1999
From owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se Wed Aug 18 22:23:15 1999
Return-Path: <owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>
Delivered-To: arla-drinkers-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 4757 invoked from network); 18 Aug 1999 22:23:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO sundance.stacken.kth.se) (130.237.234.41)
by bloom-picayune.mit.edu with SMTP; 18 Aug 1999 22:23:14 -0000
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA23874
for arla-drinkers-list; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:05:50 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from ece.cmu.edu (ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.236.200])
by sundance.stacken.kth.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA23867
for <arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se>; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:05:45 +0200 (MET DST)
From: allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
Received: from hilfy.ece.cmu.edu (root@HILFY.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.236.133])
by ece.cmu.edu (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA17455;
Wed, 18 Aug 1999 17:52:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from speaker.kf8nh.apk.net (root@ANNEX-2.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.236.2])
by hilfy.ece.cmu.edu (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA23007;
Wed, 18 Aug 1999 17:52:03 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from kf8nh.apk.net (allbery@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net [10.9.204.1])
by speaker.kf8nh.apk.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA05444;
Wed, 18 Aug 1999 17:51:54 -0400
Message-Id: <199908182151.RAA05444@speaker.kf8nh.apk.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 17:51:52 -0400 (EDT)
Reply-To: allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
Subject: Re: Is Arla free for accessing IBM AFS servers?
To: sramkris@ichips.intel.com
cc: gonter@maestria.wu-wien.ac.at, linux-afs@mit.edu,
arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se, banz@umbc.edu
In-Reply-To: <199908181455.HAA01978@pdxbsd001.pdx.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-arla-drinkers@stacken.kth.se
Precedence: bulk
On 18 Aug, Sri Ramkrishna wrote:
+-----
| There is always Coda. However, it hasn't matured yet. It's good
| to have some competition. Strange that with all the openness that IBM
| has started that it' subsidiary hasn't adopted it.
+--->8
Not surprising to me, given that they exercised the IP equivalent of
eminent domain to make it non-free in the first place....
--
brandon s. allbery os/2,linux,solaris,perl allbery@kf8nh.apk.net
system administrator kthkrb,heimdal,gnome,rt allbery@ece.cmu.edu
carnegie mellon / electrical and computer engineering kf8nh
We are Linux. Resistance is an indication that you missed the point.
