[54954] in SIPB IPv6
Nobel Prized - Cells Breakthrough [Amazing Video]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Telovite)
Mon May 25 12:40:18 2015
Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 09:40:16 -0700
To: <sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu>
From: "Telovite" <Telovite@hessin.work>
------=Part.361.2294.1432572016
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Prized.
http://www.hessin.work/l/lt5I1530XL87L/92RL340GT718L760FA2455083D1123600014
Unsub Here.
http://www.hessin.work/l/lc6F1530WA87T/92TK340CU718D760AO2455083Q1123600014
832 Pepperwood St. - Colton, Calif 92324
Delete from our subscriber distribution here
http://www.hessin.work/unsU1530BF87VY/92UV340N718AX760U2455083GL1123600014
109 E. 17th Suite 4552 - Cheyenne, WY 82001
This is an ad vertisement.
------=Part.361.2294.1432572016
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
<html>
<body><table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" width="500" bgcolor="#ffffff" align="top" height="540">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top">
<div>
<h2 align="center"><a href="http://www.hessin.work/l/lt1F1530FU87B/92LI340GB718F760VR2455083C1123600014"><img src="http://www.hessin.work/im/K1530R87R/92LM340G718XP760C2455083D1123600014/img68792251.jpg" border="0" /></a><br>
</h2>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<div align="left"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1"><br>
<a href="http://www.hessin.work/l/lc2B1530XY87L/92UO340SH718K760LJ2455083T1123600014"><font color="#666666">Unsubscribe Here</font></a>.<br>
832 Pepperwood St. - Colton, CA 92324</font>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
<<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div align="left">
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.hessin.work/unsA1530QO87EI/92HT340W718TH760O2455083HM1123600014" style="font-size:10px;"">Get out of our data here</a>
<br>
<span style="font-size: 9px ">109 E. 17th Suite 4552 - Cheyenne, WY 82001 </span>
<br>
This is ad vertisement. </div>
</p>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
BEIJING A long-awaited government report said design flaws and sloppy management
caused a bullet train crash in July that killed 40 people and
triggered a public outcry over the high cost and dangers of China's
showcase transportation system.A former railway minister was among 54 officials found responsible
for the crash, a Cabinet statement said Wednesday.The crash report was highly
anticipated by the public. Regulations required the government to release the report
by Nov. 20. When that date passed, the government offered little explanation,
drawing renewed criticism by state media, which have been unusually skeptical about
the handling of the accident and the investigation.The Cabinet statement cited "serious
design flaws and major safety risks" and what it said were a
string of errors in equipment procurement and management.The report affirmed earlier government
statements that a lightning strike caused one bullet train to stall and
a sensor failure allowed
<br>
<br>
<br>
se hopeful explains why he could win the Iowa Caucuses
<br>
<br>
<br>
authorities continued to resist the Arab League efforts.Activists said four soldiers were
killed and 12 others wounded in the ambush Wednesday that targeted a
joint military and security convoy and that was carried out by defectors
in the southern province of Daraa.The British-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights,
which reported the ambush, also said troops conducted raids and arrests in
villages in the south, forcing residents who have been on strike for
almost three weeks to open up their shops.The Local Coordination Committees also
said the army stormed the village of Khirbet Ghazaleh with bulldozers to
break the strike that lasted 18 days.The Observatory said two people died
Wednesday in Homs, one by fire from security forces fire and the
other from wounds sustained in shooting the day before.The team of about
60 Arab League monitors arrived in Syria on Monday night -- the
first foreign observers allowed in since March, when the uprising against Preside
<br>
<br>
<br>
t through. Ibrahim said her family, from the conservative southern Egyptian city
of Sohag, was supportive of her going public."I was devastated," she told
the private ONTV network. "I was hurt, and sad, and didn't expect
that from them (soldiers.) The first thing dad said is...only the law
will help you."
<br>
<br>
<br>
Everyone in Hollywood got pregnant in 2011.If you believed this year's tabloid
headlines., that isAs far as we can tell Kim Kardashian, Jennifer Aniston,
Angelina Jolie and Kate Middleton have not procreated, adopted or otherwise obtained
a child within the past 12 months, even though several tabloids said
they had.Why? Pregnancies sell magazines. Real or not.As long as people keep
buying them they will keep happening. What is shocking to myself is
that after a cover is clearly untrue why people keep buying that
source, says former OK! magazine editor and HuffPost Celebrity columnist Rob Shuter.
There is very little brand loyalty in that market with the exception
of People, so quite often they dont remember which magazine said what.And
the easiest thing about a pregnancy rumor is that if you wait
long enough it might just come true. Look at the success stories:
After two years of speculation, Jennifer Garner finally got pregnant this year,
as did Jessica Simps
<br>
<br>
<br>
iStockBad science papers can have lasting effects. Consider the 1998 paper in
the journal the Lancet that linked autism to the MMR vaccine for
measles, mumps and rubella. That paper was fully retracted in 2010 upon
evidence that senior author Andrew Wakefield had manipulated data and breached several
proper ethical codes of conduct.Nevertheless the erroneous paper continues to undermine public
confidence in vaccines. After the Lancet article, MMR vaccination rates dipped sharply
and haven't fully rebounded. This decline in the MMR vaccine has been
tied to a rise in measles cases resulting in permanent injury and
death.Each year hundreds of peer-reviewed scientific articles are retracted. Most involve no
blatant malfeasance; the authors themselves often detect errors and retract the paper.
Some retractions, however, as documented on the blog Retraction Watch, entail plagiarism,
false authorship or cooked data.No journal is safe from retractions, from the
mighty "
</body>
</html>
------=Part.361.2294.1432572016--
