[48326] in SIPB IPv6
The Hottest concept... in hair--Removal...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (NoNo Hair Removal Trials)
Fri Mar 6 15:12:11 2015
To: <sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 12:12:11 -0800
From: "NoNo Hair Removal Trials" <NoNoHairRemovalTrials@responges.eu>
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
#tab{width: 722px; background-color: #cccccc;}
#tap{margin: 13px 0; font: 11px Arial Narrow;}
#subj{font: 23px Arial; color: #0000ff ; margin: auto auto 20px auto;}
#imag{background-color:#cccccc; padding-top: 19px;}
#imag1{max-width: 722px; background-color: #cccccc; padding: 15px; border: 13px double red;}
#content{background-color: #FFFFFF; color: #FFFFFF; font-size: xx-small;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<center>
<table id="tab">
<tr>
<td align="center">
<p id="tap">
If you can't look at our Adver-tisement at all? <a href="http://www.responges.eu/l/lt1A8857OS179HD/184L788RV38837A354OT116828706UI3624001668"> simply go this to reload'em.</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center" style="padding: 10px;">
<a target="" href="http://www.responges.eu/l/lt1W8857UL179GR/184S788KT38837G354XT116828706DA3624001668" id="subj"> The Hottest concept... in hair--Removal... </a>
</td>
</tr>
<br>
<br>
<tr>
<td align="center" id="imag" >
<a href="http://www.responges.eu/l/lt1X8857EB179KJ/184D788AE38837K354DP116828706EC3624001668"><img src="http://www.responges.eu/im/P8857V179VN/184ET788K38837RC354CL116828706OX3624001668/img317918488.jpg" id="imag1" ></a>
</td>
</tr>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.responges.eu/l/lc4R8857MS179WO/184S788DP38837E354MS116828706ES3624001668"><img src="http://www.responges.eu/im/D8857J179LK/184LD788G38837KQ354KE116828706DF3624001668/img417918488.jpg"/></a>
</td>
</tr>
<TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR>
<table style="width: 722px; background-color: #FFFFFF; border: 5px;">
<tr>
<td>
<span id="content">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<p align="center" style="font: 14px;">in their own stupidity. If it is any consolation to IIQWGKLY such men HAS they MPWYK may turn to Buckle’s “History of Civilization,” and see DTPM how a man who certainly got
a marvelously clear idea of what he read, and who had read carefully the principal economists FABJGLCTR from Smith down, was inextricably confused 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 by this
jumble 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 of profits and interest. For Buckle (Vol. 1, Chap. 11, and notes) persistently GYAORYUE speaks of the distribution of wealth into rent, wages, </p>
<BR><span style="font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif, Helvetica, Arial; font-size: 9px; color: #ffffff;"></span>
<p>interest, and profits. And this 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 is not to be 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 wondered at. For, after formally KUNKN decomposing profits into wages of superintendence, insurance, and 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 interest, these economists,
in hiigning causes which fix the 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 general rate of profit, speak of things which evidently affect only that part of profits which they have
denominated interest; and then, in speaking of the rate of interest, either give ACMBORUEE the BHHKPSMJ 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 meaningless formula of supply and demand, or speak of causes which
affect the 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 compensation for risk; evidently using the word in its common sense, 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 and not in the economic 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 KSK 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 sense they have hiigned to it, from which
compensation for risk is eliminated. If the reader will take up John Stuart Mill’s “Principles of Political Economy,” and compare the chapter on 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3
Profits (Book 11, Chap. 15) with the chapter on Interest (Book MJELFIXCV III, Chap. 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 23), IRXMGYBXU he will see 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 the confusion thus arising exemplified in the case of the </p>
<BR>
<p>most logical of English economists, in a more striking manner than I would like to characterize. Now, such ICVRKIHFW men have not been led into such confusion of thought without a
cause. If they, one after another, have followed TSQEF Dr. Adam 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 Smith, as boys play “follow my leader,” jumping CJTJT 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 where he jumped, and falling where he </p>
<BR><span style="font-family: Tahoma, sans-serif, Times New Roman, Arial;"></span>
<p align="center" style="font: 16px;">fell, it has been that there was a fence where he jumped and a hole where he fell. The difficulty from which this confusion has sprung is in the preaccepted RLQDF
theory of wages. for reasons which i have before hiigned, it has OPLQTJLEM seemed to them 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 a self-evident truth that the wages of certain clhies 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 of laborers
depended JVY upon the ratio between capital 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 and the number of laborers. But there RDGOWYH are certain kinds of reward for exertion to which this theory
evidently will not apply, so the term wages has in<B>use been contracted to include</B>only wages In the narrow common EHKP sense. This being the case, if the
term interest were used, as consistently 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 with their definitions it should have been used, to represent the third part of the division of the produce,
all rewards of personal exertion, save those of what are BVJUIAXN commonly called wage-workers, would clearly have been left out. But by treating the
division of wealth 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 as between rent, wages, RQAIMJVS and profits, instead of between rent, wages and Interest, this difficulty is glossed over, all wages which </p>
<BR><BR><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 10px;"></span>
<p align="left">will not fall under 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 the preaccepted law of wages being vaguely grouped under profits, as wages of superintendence. To read carefully what 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 economists say about the distribution of wealth is
to 818cce6243dbb67e94b1e7232404c0e3 see that, though they correctly define it, wages, as they use it in this connection, is what logicians would call an undistributed term—it does not
mean all wages, but only some wages—viz., the wages of manual labor paid by an employer. XFOYYTGNT So other wages are thrown over with the return to capital, and .</p>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR><TR><TD></TD></TR>
</table>
</center>
<center><a href="http://www.responges.eu/unsFX8857XO179KN/184P788G38837W354NO116828706A3624001668"><img src="http://www.responges.eu/im/N8857F179TG/184HE788U38837QA354NR116828706HC3624001668/img217918488.jpg"/></a></center>
</body>
</html>
