[39345] in SIPB IPv6
Powerful Anti-Aging Tip – Recommended by 9 out of 10 Dermatologists
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dr. Oz Skin Secret)
Sun Feb 16 11:34:30 2014
From: "Dr. Oz Skin Secret" <Dr.OzSkinSecret@chpsheevepdu.us>
Reply-To: <bounce-73800431@chpsheevepdu.us>
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 08:34:30 -0800
To: sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu
------=Part.835.295.1392568470
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
1 Tip To Perfect Skin – REVEALED by Dr. Oz
http://www.chpsheevepdu.us/4157/228/534/1744/3555.10tt73800431AAF9.php
Unsub- http://www.chpsheevepdu.us/4157/228/534/1744/3555.10tt73800431AAF10.html
A constitutional attorney says the possibility that Foxnews.com reporter
Jana Winter could go to jail for refusing to reveal her sources
for a story in the aftermath of the Aurora movie massacre is
enough for the government to re-evaluate state Shield laws.David Rivkin,
who appeared on Fox & Friends Sunday, said there needs to be
a national solution that would never put any reporter in that situation.In
2012, Winter wrote an exclusive story detailing how alleged gunman James
Holmes sent a package to a University of Colorado psychiatrist that included
a notebook "full of details about how he was going to kill
people," according to one of her sources.Rivkin said Holmes lawyers believe
they wont get a fair trial if they dont know Winters source.Its
a very weak argument, Rivkin said.Rivkin explained that New York, where
Winter is based, has an Absolute Shield Law that protects reporters from
revealing their sources. However, New York courts decided that Winters situation
should be looked at under Colorado Shield laws, which contain exceptions
that may allow reporters to testify.This whole story to me demonstrates
that there is a need for a national solution, Rivkin said.Click for
full coverage of Fox News' First Amendment fight.
mer U.S. Attorney
Michael Sullivan, state Rep. Daniel Winslow and businessman Gabriel Gomez.The
general election is June 25, for the open Senate seat of Democrat
John Kerry.Another environmental group spending big money to defeat Lynch
is the NextGen Committee, which has reported spending more than $196,000,
according to Federal Election Commission filings.The group is backed by
California billionaire Thomas Steyer, who has called on Lynch to oppose
the pipeline. NextGen has spent $54,700 for an aerial banner that read
"Steve Lynch says: Go Habs! And Go Canadian Dirty Oil."The banner appears
to question Lynchs loyalty to the Boston Bruins. The "Habs" is the
nickname for the Montreal Canadiens. The banner was flown over downtown
Boston ahead of a matchup between the two hockey teams.NextGen also spent
more than $50,000 for video mobile billboards and $40,000 for online advertisements.
That's an apparent violation of an agreement signed by Lynch and Markey
known as the "People's Pledge," which is designed to discourage radio, television
and Internet ads by outside groups. If there is a violation, the
candidate who benefits agrees to pay half the cost of the ad
to a charity named by their rival.Markey has made environmental issues one
of his top priorities and the focus of a television campaign ad
that highlighted his role in holding BP responsible for the 2010 oil
spill in the Gulf of Mexico.Another big supporter of Markey is the
Servic
------=Part.835.295.1392568470
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html lang="en">
<head>
</head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.chpsheevepdu.us/4157/228/534/1744/3555.10tt73800431AAF1.php"><H3>1 Tip To Perfect Skin – REVEALED by Dr. Oz</a></H3></strong>
<body style="font-family: Tahoma, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;">
<center>
<p>
<a href="http://www.chpsheevepdu.us/4157/228/534/1744/3555.10tt73800431AAF2.php">Miracle Phytoceramides - Stay beautiful</a>
</p>
<a href="http://www.chpsheevepdu.us/4157/228/534/1744/3555.10tt73800431AAF3.php"><img src="http://www.chpsheevepdu.us/4157/228/534/73800431/1744.3555/img022853443.jpg" /></a>
<br />
<p style="font-size:11px;">
<br />
<a href="http://www.chpsheevepdu.us/4157/228/534/1744/3555.10tt73800431AAF4.html">Update Preferences</a><br><br />
Miracle Phytoceramides<br />
4653 Carmel Mtn Rd. STE 308 #257<br />
San Diego, CA 92130<br />
</p>
</center>
<img src="#aff_i#" width="1" height="1" /><br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.chpsheevepdu.us/u/4157/1744/3555/10/73800431/sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.chpsheevepdu.us/4157/228/534/73800431/1744.3555/img222853443.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">dge there's medical evidence
that carrying a fetus to term can lower a woman's risk for
breast cancer, but doctors convened by the National Cancer Institute a decade
ago concluded that abortion does not raise the risk for developing the
disease.The provisions dealing with tax breaks are designed to prevent the
state from subsidizing abortions, even indirectly. For example, health care
providers don't have the pay the state sales tax on items they
purchase, but the bill would deny that break to abortion providers. Also,
a woman could not include abortion costs if she deducts medical expenses
on her income taxes."Every taxpayer will be able to know with certainty
that their money is not being used for abortion," Pilcher-Cook said.But
Jordan Goldberg, state advocacy counsel for the New York City-based Center
for Reproductive Rights, called the tax provisions "appalling and discriminatory.""It's
probably, if not definitely unconstitutional, and it's incredibly mean-spirited,"
she said.
ntil evening,"
he said in a telephone interview.He said the main suspect was in
the house that was hit and the woman and children, ages 1
to 12, who were killed were members of his family."I don't think
that they knew that all these children and women were in the
house because they were under attack from the house and they were
shooting at the house," he said.The U.S.-led coalition said it provided
fire support from the air, killing several insurgents."The air support was
called in by coalition forces, not Afghan security forces, and was used
to engage insurgent forces in areas away from structures, according to our
reporting," coalition spokesman Maj. Adam Wojack said in a statement.He
said the International Security Assistance Force takes all reports of civilian
casualties seriously, and was currently assessing the incident.Afghan forces
have been increasingly taking the lead in combat operations as international
forces move to complete their withdrawal by the end of 2014. But
U.S. and other foreign troops still face dangers even as Afghans take
charge of their own security.The American adviser who died during the operation
was one of three U.S. civilians killed Saturday. The two others --
a female foreign service officer with the U.S. State Department and an
employee with the U.S. Defense Department -- were killed in a suicide
bombing in southern Zabul province during a trip to donate books to
Afghan students. Three U.S. soldiers a
</p>
</html>
------=Part.835.295.1392568470--
