[38471] in SIPB IPv6
Do you need an extra outdoor light?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (LED Light Angel)
Sun Dec 29 11:04:28 2013
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2013 08:04:27 -0800
From: "LED Light Angel" <LEDLightAngel@rodascolbqb.us>
To: sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu
Reply-To: <bounce-73800431@rodascolbqb.us>
------=Part.482.6468.1388333067
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Motion sensor outdoor LED light
http://www.rodascolbqb.us/3564/174/379/1412/2938.10tt73800431AAF11.php
Unsub- http://www.rodascolbqb.us/3564/174/379/1412/2938.10tt73800431AAF12.html
nce for lesbians than
gay men, and that gay men are significantly more likely to be
targets of violence.That research also has found that it's often straight
men who have the most difficult time with homosexuality and
particularly gay men says researcher Gregory Herek."Men are raised
to think they have to prove their masculinity, and one big part
about being masculine is being heterosexual. So we see that harassment,
jokes, negative statements and violence are often ways that even younger
men try to prove their heterosexuality," says Herek, a psychologist at the
University of California, Davis, who has, for years, studied this phenomenon
and how it plays out in the gay community.That is not, of
course, to downplay the harassment lesbians face. It can be just as
ugly.But it's not as frequent, Herek and others have found, especially in
adulthood. It's also not uncommon for lesbians to encounter straight men
who have a fascination with them."The men hit on me. The women
hit on me. But I never feel like I'm in any immediate
danger," says Sarah Toce, the 29-year-old editor of The Seattle Lesbian,
a daily online news magazine. "If I were a gay man, I
might and if it's like this in Seattle, can
you imagine what it is like in less-accepting parts of middle America?"One
of Herek's studies found that, overall, 38 percent of gay men said
that, in adulthood, they'd been victims of vandalism, theft or violence
hit, beaten or sexually
The CIA had Tamerlan Tsarnaev's name put into a terror watchlist after
being contacted by Russian authorities in 2011, sources told Fox News --
raising more questions about why the Boston bomber's trip to Russia the
following year didn't raise more red flags.Sources say the Russians contacted
the FBI once in March 2011, and several months later they contacted
the CIA about Tsarnaev.In October 2011, the CIA sent information to many
federal agencies and to "the watchlisting system" about him, the sources
say. That step ultimately put him on the vast TIDE database of
people potentially tied to terrorism cases.The FBI has said previously that
it was told Tsarnaev was a "follower of radical Islam" and was
preparing to travel to a foreign country to join unspecified underground
groups. The FBI said that it responded by interviewing Tsarnaev and family
members, but found no terrorism activity.In early 2012, Tsarnaev would travel
to Russia for six months. The nature of that trip is still
unclear.Two top Republican senators are now calling for a Senate Homeland
Security Committee hearing on the Boston Marathon bombings, as lawmakers
question whether enough was done to prevent the attack.Sens. John McCain,
R-Ariz., and Kelly Ayotte, R-NH, requested the hearing Wednesday, saying
"it has become increasingly apparent that more questions need to be answered
regarding the failure to prevent this tragedy."The senators cited the reporting
by Fox News an
------=Part.482.6468.1388333067
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>Light Angel — The Motion Activated Stick Up LED Light</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
</head>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.rodascolbqb.us/3564/174/379/1412/2938.10tt73800431AAF1.php"><H3>Motion sensor outdoor LED light</a></H3></strong>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0">
<table width="320" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="5" id="container">
<tr>
<td style="font:12px/18px Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;" id="header">
<p>
<a href="http://www.rodascolbqb.us/3564/174/379/1412/2938.10tt73800431AAF2.php">Light Angel — The Motion Activated Stick Up LED Light</a>
</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.rodascolbqb.us/3564/174/379/1412/2938.10tt73800431AAF3.php"><img src="http://www.rodascolbqb.us/3564/174/379/73800431/1412.2938/img017437943.jpg" alt="Light Angel — The Motion Activated Stick Up LED Light" width="320" height="533" border="0" id="body"></a>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="center">
<a href="http://www.rodascolbqb.us/3564/174/379/1412/2938.10tt73800431AAF4.html"><img src="http://www.rodascolbqb.us/3564/174/379/73800431/1412.2938/img117437943.gif" border="0"></a>
<a href="http://www.rodascolbqb.us/3564/174/379/1412/2938.10tt73800431AAF5.html"><img src="http://www.rodascolbqb.us/3564/174/379/73800431/1412.2938/img217437943.gif" border="0"></a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.rodascolbqb.us/u/3564/1412/2938/10/73800431/sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.rodascolbqb.us/3564/174/379/73800431/1412.2938/img317437943.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">isis in Syria."President Obama has said
the use of chemical weapons would be a "game-changer" in the U.S.
position on intervening in the two-year-old Syrian civil war. Obama said
last August that "a red line for us" would be the movement
or use of chemical weapons, adding "that would change my calculus."Sen.
Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., reacting to the reports Thursday, said the "number
one" goal should be to "secure the chemical weapons before they fall
into the wrong hands.""I think the red line's been crossed and the
question is, now what?" Graham said on Fox News.Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn.,
also said in a statement the assessment is "deeply troubling and, if
correct, means that President Obama's red line has certainly been crossed."But
Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., argued that it is not in the United
States' "best interest" to go into Syria. "We cannot be absolutely sure
about the extent to which Assad's forces have used chemical weapons, although
we know they have them," he said in a statement.Caitlin Hayden, a
spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council, said more information
is needed."Precisely because the president takes this issue so seriously,
we have an obligation to fully investigate any and all evidence of
chemical weapons use within Syria," she said in a statement. "That is
why we are currently pressing for a comprehensive United Nations investigation
that can credibly evaluate the evidence and establish what took plac
ty about whether Social Security will
be there for future retirees. Among voters under age 65, opinions are
almost evenly divided: 46 percent think there will be enough money to
pay their full benefits, while 50 percent think it's unlikely.Twelve percent
think it is "very" likely there will be enough money for full
benefits.Meanwhile, the notion of means-testing benefits as a cost-cutting
measure is a no-go. Fifty-nine percent of voters say everyone who paid
Social Security taxes should receive an equal amount when they retire. Just
over a third -- 36 percent -- would rather see the benefit
based on financial need.Poll Pourri ...Is the nation's job situation is
getting better or worse? Take your pick: 42 percent are optimistic, while
44 percent see darker clouds. Either way, just over half -- 51
percent -- disapprove of how Obama is handling job creation (43 percent
approve).Partisanship plays a big role in those views: 71 percent of Democrats
approve of Obama's record on job creation, while 81 percent of Republicans
disapprove.And 60 percent of Democrats think the situation is getting better,
while 63 percent of Republicans say it's getting worse.Overall, a 60-percent
majority is dissatisfied with conditions in the U.S. By comparison, 79 percent
were dissatisfied in the days before Obama took office in January 2009.Some
40 percent of voters are currently satisfied with the way things are
going in the country, up slightly from 37 percen
</p>
</html>
------=Part.482.6468.1388333067--
