[36509] in SIPB IPv6
Chat with Singles Near You
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Match.com)
Mon Nov 4 14:11:06 2013
Reply-To: <bounce-73800431@tomcodgongcoo.us>
From: "Match.com" <Match.com@tomcodgongcoo.us>
To: sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:11:04 -0800
------=Part.24.7032.1383592264
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Dating News: 1 in 5 Relationships Start Online - Meet Singles Today!
http://www.tomcodgongcoo.us/2904/107/216/996/1972.10tt73800431AAF18.php
Unsub- http://www.tomcodgongcoo.us/2904/107/216/996/1972.10tt73800431AAF8.html
lowest rating hes
received on health care since his 13-point negative rating in December 2011
(42-55 percent). Seven percent of voters say health care is the most
important issue facing the country, which puts it well behind the economy
(42 percent), the federal deficit (17 percent) and terrorism (9 percent)
on the priority list. Health care still tops guns (5 percent), Social
Security (5 percent), immigration (4 percent) and foreign policy (1 percent).These
Fox News health care poll results are based on landline and cell
phone interviews with 1,009 randomly chosen registered voters nationwide.
The poll was conducted under the joint direction of Anderson Robbins Research
(D) and Shaw & Company Research (R) from April 20 - 22.
The full poll has a margin of sampling error of plus or
minus three percentage points.Medical MarijuanaAlmost all voters -- 85 percent
-- say its okay for adults to use medical marijuana if it
is prescribed by a physician.Still, theres some doubt about its use: The
poll, finds 30 percent of voters think people who smoke medical marijuana
truly need it for medical purposes, while nearly half -- 47 percent
-- think those people just want to smoke pot.In general, voters are
about evenly divided over legalizing marijuana: 46 percent of voters favor
legalization, while 49 oppose. Democrats favor the legal route by 57-39
percent; Republicans oppose it, 62-33 percent.These Fox News poll results
on marijuana are based on
rst in a new round of hearings on the
subject on May 8.In two letters to the State Department, dated April
16 and April 26, Issa has sought explicit guidance on how attorneys
representing witnesses with knowledge of the Benghazi attacks, including
their prelude and aftermath, can receive the security clearances necessary
to review classified materials.Attorneys representing Department personnel
in this matter will require clearance to possess and discuss Top Secret
and Sensitive Compartmented Information, Issa wrote on April 16 to Mary
McLeod, the principal deputy legal adviser to the State Department.But Ventrell
insisted Tuesday that no such whistle-blowers have come forward, and no
requests for security clearances have been made by private attorneys.Victoria
Toensing, a former Justice Department official and one-time Republican counsel
to the Senate intelligence committee, disclosed on Monday that she is representing
a career State Department official who identifies himself as a whistle-blower.
Toensing said this individual has been threatened by superiors with career-ending
reprisals if he cooperates with the oversight committee.[The State Department
has] had two letters from Chairman Issa, one on April 16, the
other one April 26, that specifically say, We want you to provide
a process for clearing a lawyer to receive classified information, Toensing
said during an interview Tuesday on Americas Newsroom with Fox News anchor
Martha M
------=Part.24.7032.1383592264
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.tomcodgongcoo.us/2904/107/216/996/1972.10tt73800431AAF14.php"><H3>Dating News: 1 in 5 Relationships Start Online - Meet Singles Today!</a></H3></strong>
<td colspan='2' align='center' valign='middle' class='preview-mid'><br><center><a href="http://www.tomcodgongcoo.us/2904/107/216/996/1972.10tt73800431AAF14.php"><img src="http://www.tomcodgongcoo.us/2904/107/216/73800431/996.1972/img010721643.jpg" border=0 alt=""></a></center> <div align="center"><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="1"><br><a href="http://www.tomcodgongcoo.us/2904/107/216/996/1972.10tt73800431AAF3.html"><font color="#666666">Update Preferences</font></a><br><br> Match.com | P.O. Box 25472 | Dallas, TX 75225 </font></td></td></tr></table>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.tomcodgongcoo.us/u/2904/996/1972/10/73800431/sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.tomcodgongcoo.us/2904/107/216/73800431/996.1972/img210721643.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p> </br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">ions of users.Using the simple MyGlass
smartphone app, you can configure the Google+ sharing features on Glass:
Which of your contacts you want ready access to, which groups you
want to share videos and pictures to, and so on. For what
its worth, Google+ actually does social networking better than Facebook
in some ways, and sharing pics with groups and individuals is as
easy as taking them.On the other hand, social networking is both a
Glass strength and its Achilles Heel: Everyone I saw while wearing Glass
stared, then eventually asked me if I was recording them. Are we
live right now? Is this online?For the record, no, Glass is not
violating your privacy. No, it is not surreptitiously recording you. No,
it does not do face recognition. No, I am not seeing through
your clothing.While Googles wild invention does raise those questions, the
device is designed to skirt them all: To start recording a video
or snap a shot, you need to actively turn it on. And
theres no red light on the front to indicate activity, but whoever
youre speaking with should be able to see the active screen.And Google
told me face recognition would require some processing power thats simply
out of the question, at least for now.That said, what it does
do is tantalize. Want directions? There they are. Want to share a
picture of your trip? Done. Need a fact to wow a dinner
party? There it is.Just dont wear Glass during the dinner party. At
least, thats what my wi
This April 2013 image shows Yosemite Valley at Yosemite National Park in
California.APTwo months after the sequester hit, the Department of Interior
continues to warn of coast-to-coast cuts for the country's national parks
-- and even the partial shutdown of a critical flood warning system.But
Sen. Tom Coburn says there's "no shortage of potential savings," pointing
out that the department is nevertheless spending millions on newly created
monuments and landmarks.The Oklahoma Republican, who has been hounding federal
agencies for weeks about questionable spending under the cloud of sequester,
aired his grievances with the Interior Department in a letter to Secretary
Sally Jewell Tuesday."It makes little sense to expand the number of sites
at the same time the budget of every other park is being
cut and visitors are being turned away from visiting the White House,"
Coburn wrote.Coburn pointedly questioned department efforts to name new
sites and expand others -- decisions that will contribute to the department's
annual costs. Coburn said the National Park Service has designated 13 new
historic landmarks and three new monuments since the sequester hit March
1. One of those landmarks, he noted, is a whiskey distillery --
the George T. Stagg Distillery in Kentucky. Other newly created landmarks
include the Connecticut home of abolitionist Harriet Beecher Stowe, the
historic bridge crossed by civil rights marchers in Selma, Ala., and an
arti
</p>
</html>
------=Part.24.7032.1383592264--
