[36204] in SIPB IPv6
Don't miss the Medicare Advantage deadline. Find a plan today...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Senior Plans)
Tue Oct 29 13:05:27 2013
To: sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu
From: "Senior Plans" <SeniorPlans@dbfwaifwint.us>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:05:27 -0700
------=Part.952.8114.1383066327
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Medicare enrollment period for 2013. Compare plans before the deadline...
http://www.dbfwaifwint.us/2789/159/347/1299/2751.10tt73800431AAF9.php
Unsub- http://www.dbfwaifwint.us/2789/159/347/1299/2751.10tt73800431AAF10.html
uch better than in the previous quarter.
Economists worry, though, that federal spending cuts and higher Social Security
taxes could hurt the economy. And new requirements under the federal health
care law may be causing some small and midsize companies to hold
back on hiring.The Associated Press contributed to this report.April 11,
2013: Kathie Maiello of Any-Time Home Care, left, talks with Jashod Chaney
of Albany at the Dr. King Career Fair at the Empire State
Plaza Convention Center, in Albany, N.Y.
get said many
of the claimed benefits from EPA clean air regulations "are mostly attributable
to the reduction in public exposure to a single air pollutant: fine
particulate matter."The EPA claims that changes made to emissions standards
and other areas will save billions in health costs for the public.The
same report estimated that in fiscal 2012, 14 major rules came with
between $14.8 billion and $19.5 billion in annual costs, but with between
$53.2 billion and $114.6 billion in annual benefits.The Heritage report's
estimate of the annual costs imposed in 2012 were not that far
off -- Heritage pegged the annual cost of 2012 rules at $23.5
billion.The Heritage report did not delve deeply into the benefits of all
these regulations, though suggested the administration has exaggerated those
numbers. The analysis said the "particulate matter" pollutant EPA often
cites is already subject to EPA regulations, calling the claimed benefits
of additional reductions "speculative."
------=Part.952.8114.1383066327
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
<html>
<head></head>
<body>
<strong><center><a href="http://www.dbfwaifwint.us/2789/159/347/1299/2751.10tt73800431AAF1.php"><H3>Medicare enrollment period for 2013. Compare plans before the deadline...</a></H3></strong>
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0">
<tr>
<td style="width: 550px">
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" style="font-family: arial, verdana; font-size: 16px; color: #333;">
<tr>
<td colspan="5" style="font-size: 12px; text-align: center"><br>If you cannot see the below image, please visit us <a href="http://www.dbfwaifwint.us/2789/159/347/1299/2751.10tt73800431AAF2.php" target="_blank" style="color: #000">HERE</a><br><br><br></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="5"><br><a href="http://www.dbfwaifwint.us/2789/159/347/1299/2751.10tt73800431AAF3.php" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.dbfwaifwint.us/2789/159/347/73800431/1299.2751/img015934743.jpg" alt="The 2011-12 Medicare Annual Enrollment Period Is Here" border="0" style="display: block"></a></td>
</tr>
<td colspan="5"><center><a href="http://www.dbfwaifwint.us/2789/159/347/1299/2751.10tt73800431AAF4.html" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.dbfwaifwint.us/2789/159/347/73800431/1299.2751/img115934743.jpg" alt="" border="0" style="display: block"></a></center></td>
</tr>
</table><br><br>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</center>
<br />
<br /><br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<br /><br />
<br />
<center>This email was intended for sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu
<br />
<a href="http://www.dbfwaifwint.us/u/2789/1299/2751/10/73800431/sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu" target="_blank"><img border="0" src="http://www.dbfwaifwint.us/2789/159/347/73800431/1299.2751/img215934743.jpg"></a>
</center>
</body>
</p></p></p></p></p></p></p></p>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br>
</br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></br></center>
<p style="font-size:xx-small;">Sept. 4, 2011: Shown here is the main plant facility at the
Navajo Generating Station, as seen from Lake Powell in Page, Ariz.APPresident
Obama, in each of his last three State of the Union addresses,
spoke urgently of the need to cut through the "red tape" in
Washington.But regulatory costs for the American public and business community,
it turns out, soared during his first term. A new report by
the conservative Heritage Foundation estimates that annual regulatory costs
increased during Obama's first four years by nearly $70 billion -- with
more regulations in store for term two."While historical records are incomplete,
that magnitude of regulation is likely unmatched by any administration in
the nation's history," the report said.The analysis by Heritage did not
count every single regulation issued in Obama's first term, but looked at
"major" regulations impacting the private sector. It came up with 131 over
the past four years -- many of them environmental. In addition to
the $70 billion in annual costs from those rules, the report estimated
that new regulations from the first term led to roughly $12 billion
in one-time "implementation costs."The math is up for debate. Even Heritage
acknowledges there is no "official accounting" for federal regulatory costs.
But government agencies, as well as think tanks like Heritage, have tried
to track the price tag by looking at records maintained by the
Government Accountability Office and age
eeting earlier in the day to "cooperate on the basis of mutual
respect" to promote an efficient and effective strategy.Obama arrived in
Mexico Thursday afternoon for a three-day trip that will also include a
stop in Costa Rica. Domestic issues followed the president south of the
border, with Obama facing questions in his exchange with reporters about
the potential escalation of the U.S. role in Syria, a controversy over
contraception access for teenage girls, and the delicate debate on Capitol
Hill on an immigration overhaul.The latter issue is being closely watched
in Mexico, given the large number of Mexicans who have emigrated to
the U.S. both legally and illegally. More than half of the 11
million people in the U.S. illegally are Mexican, according to the Pew
Research Center.For Obama, the immigration debate is rife with potential
political pitfalls. While he views an overhaul of the nation's patchwork
immigration laws as a legacy-building issue, he's been forced to keep a
low-profile role in the debate to avoid scaring off wary Republicans.In
an effort to court those GOP lawmakers, the draft bill being debated
on Capitol Hill focuses heavily on securing the border with Mexico, and
makes doing so a pre-condition for a pathway to citizenship for those
in the U.S. illegally. But Florida Republican Sen. Marco Rubio, one of
the bill's architects, said Thursday that unless the border security measures
are made even tougher, the legislati
</p>
</html>
------=Part.952.8114.1383066327--
