[20913] in SIPB IPv6

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: limekiller pkgsrc update

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Quentin Smith)
Thu Dec 31 11:32:52 2009

Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:32:48 -0500 (EST)
From: Quentin Smith <quentin@MIT.EDU>
To: Greg Troxel <gdt@work.lexort.com>
cc: sipbv6@mit.edu
In-Reply-To: <smuk4w39s7i.fsf@linuxpal.mit.edu>

Before we invest too much time in updating limekiller, I'd like to see it 
move to newer x86 hardware, either as a VM or dedicated. Would NetBSD 
still be the best OS choice on x86?

--Quentin

On Thu, 31 Dec 2009, Greg Troxel wrote:

> I update packges on limekiller to recent head pkgsrc (which is in a
> quarterly freeze).  I discussed this with danjared@ and/or raeburn@ long
> ago and finally got to it.
>
> The big change is that quagga is now at 0.99.15, which I have been
> running at BBN and on sunpal7.
>
> Other pkgsrc changes people probably don't care about too much:
>
>  mk.conf adjusted to
>    build binary packages for dependencies
>    install rc.d scripts in /etc
>    turned off use of ccache - circular dependencies in pkg_install
>    turned off X11_TYPE=xorg as that is no longer supported
>
>  pkg_rolling-replace installed
>
>  everything but gmake and ccache has been rebuilt (new version, or
>  dependency updated)
>
>  arla deleted (wasn't running, had some complicated dependencies)
>    of course easy to add back
>
>  perl now at 5.10
>  bash not at 4
>  subversion deleted, and language bindings and apache removed
>    subversion-base remains, with apr1
>
>  random stuff that didn't look intentional pruned
>
> other sysadmin changes:
>
>  etcmanage installed, unchanged files registered
>
>  added tick.ir.bbn.com (truetime XL-DC, in my office at BBN, reachable
>  over IPv6) to ntp.conf
>
> future plans:
>
>  update along netbsd-3 branch to latest
>    maybe dropping notion of MKFOO=no - doesn't seem necessary
>    probably via build done elsewhere
>
>  install new bootblocks from netbsd-3
>
>  move to netbsd-5, maybe via netbsd-4 (this is tricky with boot block
>  changes)
>
>
> Let me know if any of this is objectionable; I'm guessing it all seems
> fine.
>
>

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post