[139018] in SIPB IPv6

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Take this survey for a PREDATOR 3500 Watt Inverter Generator

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tractor Supply Department)
Thu Sep 25 08:42:02 2025

X-Original-To: sipbv6-mtg@pergamon.mit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="33dace6bd80982a53857be2bf7b6890f_364a7_27a"
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 14:41:45 +0200
From: "Tractor Supply Department" <Predator3500WGenerator@craftivo.ru.com>
Reply-To: "Tractor Supply Prize Giveaway" <TractorSupplyRewards@craftivo.ru.com>
To: <sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <rxdj6hi1s9ch1fj9-kk1wbul25euqpk2d-364a7-27a@craftivo.ru.com>

--33dace6bd80982a53857be2bf7b6890f_364a7_27a
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Take this survey for a PREDATOR 3500 Watt Inverter Generator

http://craftivo.ru.com/cC0xHQfAYLeHkMU4e4WmmsgSowCfg1QOLWaLXI5kzYaGoFPkYg

http://craftivo.ru.com/g4CPKHee8FfTx3j_pQIEsDvSYtEzCjgyJpDWJFdHp8AbTs8G

mians contain two monophyletic groups (the suborder Strepsirrhini, or lemurs, lorises and allies, as well as the tarsiers of the suborder Haplorhini); it is a paraphyletic grouping because it excludes the Simiiformes, which also are descendants of the common ancestor Primates.
Monkeys comprise two monophyletic groups, New World monkeys and Old World monkeys, but is paraphyletic because it excludes hominoids, superfamily Hominoidea, also descendants of the common ancestor Simiiformes.
Apes as a whole, and the great apes, are paraphyletic if the terms are used such that they exclude humans.
Thus, the members of the two sets of groups, and hence names, do not match, which causes problems in relating scientific names to common (usually traditional) names. Consider the superfamily Hominoidea: In terms of the common names on the right, this group consists of apes and humans and there is no single common name for all the members of the group. One remedy is to create a new common name, in this case hominoids. Another possibility is to expand the use of one of the traditional names. For example, in his 2005 book, the vertebrate palaeontologist Benton wrote, "The apes, Hominoidea, today include the gibbons and orangutan ... the gorilla and chimpanzee ... and humans"; thereby Benton was using apes to mean hominoids. In that case, the group heretofore called apes must now be identified as the non-human apes.

As of 2021, there is no consensus as to whether to accept traditional (that is, common), but paraphyletic, names or to use monophyletic names only; or to use 'new' common names or adaptations of old ones. Both competing approaches can be found in biological sources, often in the same work, and sometimes by the same author. Thus, Benton defines apes to include humans, then he repeatedly uses ape-like to mean 'like an ape rather than a human'; and when discussing the reaction of others to a new fossil he writes of "claims that Orrorin ... was an ape rather tha

--33dace6bd80982a53857be2bf7b6890f_364a7_27a
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
<head>
	<title>Newsletter</title>
</head>
<body><a href="http://craftivo.ru.com/OGVwn3XoEmRkBtCw2qWAALXSrKuKgXKGW2vWKUBUsPMYIizv5A"><img src="http://craftivo.ru.com/7ba27975a54460d93c.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.craftivo.ru.com/pieIZwAn5k9PyhdP_AdikjuI2FXRax82PzGlvhQ71Fzu3PL02Q" width="1" /></a>
<center>&nbsp;
<div style="font-size:16px;font-family:Arial;width:500px;">If image is not visible to you <b style="font-size:16px;"><a href="http://craftivo.ru.com/cC0xHQfAYLeHkMU4e4WmmsgSowCfg1QOLWaLXI5kzYaGoFPkYg" rel="sponsored" target="blank">then click here.</a></b></div>
&nbsp;

<div style="font-size:20px;font-family:Arial;width:500px;"><b style="font-size:20px;"><a href="http://craftivo.ru.com/cC0xHQfAYLeHkMU4e4WmmsgSowCfg1QOLWaLXI5kzYaGoFPkYg" rel="sponsored" target="blank">Take this survey for a PREDATOR 3500 Watt Inverter Generator</a></b></div>
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://craftivo.ru.com/cC0xHQfAYLeHkMU4e4WmmsgSowCfg1QOLWaLXI5kzYaGoFPkYg" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img alt="Predator Generator" src="http://craftivo.ru.com/fd3d73a338880d54be.png" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
&nbsp;
<div style="color:#FFFFFF;">mians contain two monophyletic groups (the suborder Strepsirrhini, or lemurs, lorises and allies, as well as the tarsiers of the suborder Haplorhini); it is a paraphyletic grouping because it excludes the Simiiformes, which also are descendants of the common ancestor Primates. Monkeys comprise two monophyletic groups, New World monkeys and Old World monkeys, but is paraphyletic because it excludes hominoids, superfamily Hominoidea, also descendants of the common ancestor Simiiformes. Apes as a whole, and the great apes, are paraphyletic if the terms are used such that they exclude humans. Thus, the members of the two sets of groups, and hence names, do not match, which causes problems in relating scientific names to common (usually traditional) names. Consider the superfamily Hominoidea: In terms of the common names on the right, this group consists of apes and humans and there is no single common name for all the members of the group. One remedy is to create a new common name, in this case hominoids. Another possibility is to expand the use of one of the traditional names. For example, in his 2005 book, the vertebrate palaeontologist Benton wrote, &quot;The apes, Hominoidea, today include the gibbons and orangutan ... the gorilla and chimpanzee ... and humans&quot;; thereby Benton was using apes to mean hominoids. In that case, the group heretofore called apes must now be identified as the non-human apes. As of 2021, there is no consensus as to whether to accept traditional (that is, common), but paraphyletic, names or to use monophyletic names only; or to use &#39;new&#39; common names or adaptations of old ones. Both competing approaches can be found in biological sources, often in the same work, and sometimes by the same author. Thus, Benton defines apes to include humans, then he repeatedly uses ape-like to mean &#39;like an ape rather than a human&#39;; and when discussing the reaction of others to a new fossil he writes of &quot;claims that Orrorin ... was an ape rather tha</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://craftivo.ru.com/VJ5Kz6YSZZsnTCR4moNY9APImHDaZO7y_LV_HVCh4KOgo-k" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img alt=" " src="http://craftivo.ru.com/1a2fe6d5704eb49dcc.png" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
&nbsp;</center>
</body>
</html>

--33dace6bd80982a53857be2bf7b6890f_364a7_27a--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post