[137962] in SIPB IPv6

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

A new kind of lemon aid

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Social Tonic)
Tue Jul 8 06:40:37 2025

X-Original-To: sipbv6-mtg@pergamon.mit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1e9cf327a9e44db760f36c72e91c90c4_3120b_2fc4"
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 12:24:34 +0200
From: "Social Tonic" <SocialTonic@abhishek.ru.com>
Reply-To: "Social Tonic" <BREZSocialTonic@abhishek.ru.com>
To: <sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <8a6khqvl8pyi8bk8-pk39pl3c9gq4z8q7-3120b-2fc4@abhishek.ru.com>

--1e9cf327a9e44db760f36c72e91c90c4_3120b_2fc4
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

A new kind of lemon aid

http://abhishek.ru.com/jXnbOccZeUxXK3eOh8N7sRKmE-NivRcI5ASz8STz8WVS4RK4Hw

http://abhishek.ru.com/VmGtjAn4kj_OrEm6lJEiyEFoNHOlVP1eePJljjY8Tfv2ATXyag

vivid a result is obtained without sacrificing the light and color in the other parts of the picture; and the effect, while no less intense, is, therefore, less startling and loud.

These assessments were not universal. The critic for Philadelphia's The Evening Telegraph, who may have been aware of the personal politics involved in the advisory group of artists who rejected it, wrote:

There is nothing so fine in the American section of the Art Department of the Exhibition, and it is a great pity that the squeamishness of the Selecting Committee compelled the artist to find a place for it in the United States Hospital building. It is rumored that the blood on Dr. Gross' fingers made some of the members of the committee sick, but, judging from the quality of the work exhibited by them we fear that it was not the blood alone that made them sick. Artists have before now been known to sicken at the sight of pictures by younger men which they in their souls were compelled to acknowledge were beyond their emulation.

Controversy about the painting has centered on its violence, and on the melodramatic presence of the woman. Modern scholars have suggested that the painting may be read in terms of castration anxiety and fantasies of mastery over the body (e.g. Michael Fried), and that it documents Eakins's ambivalence about representing sex difference (e.g. Jennifer Doyle). The painting has also been understood to be drawing an analogy between painting and surgery and as identifying the work of the artist with the emergence of surgery as a respected profession.

In 2002, Michael Kimmelman of The New York Times called it "hands down, the finest 19th-century American painting." In 2006, in response to the impending sale of this painting, The New York Times published a "close reading" which sketches some of the different critical perspectives on this wo

--1e9cf327a9e44db760f36c72e91c90c4_3120b_2fc4
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
<html lang="en">
<head><meta charset="UTF-8"><meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
	<title>Newsletter</title>
</head>
<body><a href="http://abhishek.ru.com/7wafjx66UfBjHvoikn_1-_926fRkeRo-zRjPDK9_vWbdUhRbQQ"><img src="http://abhishek.ru.com/5610017757ef614165.jpg" /><img height="1" src="http://www.abhishek.ru.com/F-_VQcX0ER5ojv2HCKJktQdH5w7vcWsuaxPVR9FOMIYPeKY6pw" width="1" /></a>
<center>
<div style="font-size:22px;font-family:'Roboto','Roboto','Oxygen','Ubuntu','Cantarell','Fira Sans','Droid Sans','Helvetica Neue',sans-serif;width:600px;"><a href="http://abhishek.ru.com/jXnbOccZeUxXK3eOh8N7sRKmE-NivRcI5ASz8STz8WVS4RK4Hw" style="font-size:26px;color:#FF0000;font-weight:bold;" target="blank">A new kind of lemon aid</a><br />
<br />
<a href="http://abhishek.ru.com/jXnbOccZeUxXK3eOh8N7sRKmE-NivRcI5ASz8STz8WVS4RK4Hw" http:="" microsoft.com="" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://abhishek.ru.com/3d0d2b66f77c2b0688.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
&nbsp;
<center><a href="http://abhishek.ru.com/fucCkURlBokNnVRiyI9LfiNakddJtFAJSFXUpSo_KTbDNAurcQ" http:="" microsoft.com="" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://abhishek.ru.com/935b047535d8234a4d.jpg" /></a></center>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
&nbsp;
<div style="color:#FFFFFF;font-size:8px;">vivid a result is obtained without sacrificing the light and color in the other parts of the picture; and the effect, while no less intense, is, therefore, less startling and loud. These assessments were not universal. The critic for Philadelphia&#39;s The Evening Telegraph, who may have been aware of the personal politics involved in the advisory group of artists who rejected it, wrote: There is nothing so fine in the American section of the Art Department of the Exhibition, and it is a great pity that the squeamishness of the Selecting Committee compelled the artist to find a place for it in the United States Hospital building. It is rumored that the blood on Dr. Gross&#39; fingers made some of the members of the committee sick, but, judging from the quality of the work exhibited by them we fear that it was not the blood alone that made them sick. Artists have before now been known to sicken at the sight of pictures by younger men which they in their souls were compelled to acknowledge were beyond their emulation. Controversy about the painting has centered on its violence, and on the melodramatic presence of the woman. Modern scholars have suggested that the painting may be read in terms of castration anxiety and fantasies of mastery over the body (e.g. Michael Fried), and that it documents Eakins&#39;s ambivalence about representing sex difference (e.g. Jennifer Doyle). The painting has also been understood to be drawing an analogy between painting and surgery and as identifying the work of the artist with the emergence of surgery as a respected profession. In 2002, Michael Kimmelman of The New York Times called it &quot;hands down, the finest 19th-century American painting.&quot; In 2006, in response to the impending sale of this painting, The New York Times published a &quot;close reading&quot; which sketches some of the different critical perspectives on this wo</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
&nbsp;
<center><a href="http://abhishek.ru.com/VmGtjAn4kj_OrEm6lJEiyEFoNHOlVP1eePJljjY8Tfv2ATXyag" http:="" microsoft.com="" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://abhishek.ru.com/3a5823d29228f657c6.jpg" /></a></center>
<br />
&nbsp;</div>
</center>
</body>
</html>

--1e9cf327a9e44db760f36c72e91c90c4_3120b_2fc4--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post