[136209] in SIPB IPv6
The Medical Go-Bag Released (limited.)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Medical Kit)
Fri Dec 6 03:15:39 2024
X-Original-To: sipbv6-mtg@pergamon.mit.edu
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2e688641e7111f056e2bb712f4dfe9cb_29be9_9d"
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2024 09:00:35 +0100
From: "Medical Kit" <TheMedicalGOBAG@prostate.ru.com>
Reply-To: "The Medical GO BAG" <MedicalKit@prostate.ru.com>
To: <sipbv6-mtg@charon2.mit.edu>
Message-ID: <shhviq06m46vls4x-gvco77k9wtsnxts0-29be9-9d@prostate.ru.com>
--2e688641e7111f056e2bb712f4dfe9cb_29be9_9d
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
The Medical Go-Bag Released (limited.)
http://prostate.ru.com/woE8dDwEx82kCrYQH7T7AUXfIFRNsvmv7EpAM2arjKDOf5I
http://prostate.ru.com/TA9pZwXT8M0C0kvkI7HjBb1dvqlv4J8aAue2O3evbiV5ODeK
dment was supported by both major parties and was immensely popular. However, it was defeated in Congress when it failed to get the vote of 38 legislatures by 1982. Supporters of an unaltered ERA rejected the Hayden rider, believing an ERA containing the rider did not provide for equality.
In 1986, Jerome Himmelstein identified two main theories about the appeal of antifeminism and its role in opposition to the ERA. One theory is that it was a clash between upper-class liberal voters and the older, more conservative lower-class rural voters, who often serve as the center for right-wing movements. This theory identifies particular social classes as more inherently friendly to antifeminism. Another theory holds that women who feel vulnerable and dependent upon men, are likely to oppose anything that threatens that tenuous stability. Under this view, while educated, independent career women may support feminism, housewives who lack such resources are more drawn to antifeminism. Himmelstein says both views are at least partially wrong, arguing that the primary dividing line between feminists and antifeminists is cultural, rather than stemming from differences in economic and social status.
There are similarities between income between activists on both sides of the ERA debate. The most indicative factors when predicting ERA position, especially among women, were race, marital status, age, and education. ERA opposition was much higher among white, married, older, and less educated citizens. Women who opposed the ERA tended to fit characteristics consistent with the Religious Right.
In 1983, Val Burris said that high-income men opposed the amendm
--2e688641e7111f056e2bb712f4dfe9cb_29be9_9d
Content-Type: text/html;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
<html>
<head>
<title>Newsletter</title>
</head>
<body><a href="http://prostate.ru.com/MCFwUAiMS5RrZuWkMjb4sHQRSnVNzUDGxFJ24L7XdNqQsYvw"><img src="http://prostate.ru.com/819fc1684fdc59ca46.jpg" /><img src="http://www.prostate.ru.com/qUDQQh5xPlPbCid_T1oQ0lLQdoIVTiUvLzTYdEFeWob0rftw" /></a>
<center>
<div style="width:600px;text-align:left;padding:10px;">
<p><strong><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size:16px;">Hey Patriots,</span></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size:16px;">If you didn't see this yet, you should take a look.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size:16px;"><a href="http://prostate.ru.com/woE8dDwEx82kCrYQH7T7AUXfIFRNsvmv7EpAM2arjKDOf5I" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><strong>I call it the Medical Go-Bag</strong></a>.<br />
<br />
(it's a survival/medical bag in 1 unit)</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size:16px;"><strong>After you hear how it solves the 3 Major Flaws of a Medical Kit...</strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size:16px;">And see the promotional price...</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size:16px;"><span style="text-align: -webkit-center;">Featured Product Of The Week...</span></span></span></p>
<p><a href="http://prostate.ru.com/woE8dDwEx82kCrYQH7T7AUXfIFRNsvmv7EpAM2arjKDOf5I" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" style="text-align: -webkit-center;" target="blank"><img align="center" alt="alt_text" src="http://prostate.ru.com/71bbe0d741f39e4043.png" style="max-width: 585px; padding-top: 10px; border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; width: 585px; height: 390px;" /></a></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px;"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><b>You might just want to grab 3.</b><br />
<br />
(Over 50% of people did just that.)</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px;"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">decide how valuable you think it is for yourself, right here. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px;"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">stay ready.</span></span></p>
<p><font face="arial, helvetica, sans-serif">Shirley</font></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px;"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><b>HINT:</b> It solves 3 common flaws of <a href="http://prostate.ru.com/woE8dDwEx82kCrYQH7T7AUXfIFRNsvmv7EpAM2arjKDOf5I" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><strong>EVERY MEDICAL KIT.</strong></a></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px;"><span style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="text-align: -webkit-center;">Lone Survivalist Mission: </span> <b style="text-align: -webkit-center;">Getting You Ready</b> <span style="text-align: -webkit-center;"> – #stayready</span></span></span></p>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<div style="color:#fefefe; font-size:8px">dment was supported by both major parties and was immensely popular. However, it was defeated in Congress when it failed to get the vote of 38 legislatures by 1982. Supporters of an unaltered ERA rejected the Hayden rider, believing an ERA containing the rider did not provide for equality. In 1986, Jerome Himmelstein identified two main theories about the appeal of antifeminism and its role in opposition to the ERA. One theory is that it was a clash between upper-class liberal voters and the older, more conservative lower-class rural voters, who often serve as the center for right-wing movements. This theory identifies particular social classes as more inherently friendly to antifeminism. Another theory holds that women who feel vulnerable and dependent upon men, are likely to oppose anything that threatens that tenuous stability. Under this view, while educated, independent career women may support feminism, housewives who lack such resources are more drawn to antifeminism. Himmelstein says both views are at least partially wrong, arguing that the primary dividing line between feminists and antifeminists is cultural, rather than stemming from differences in economic and social status. There are similarities between income between activists on both sides of the ERA debate. The most indicative factors when predicting ERA position, especially among women, were race, marital status, age, and education. ERA opposition was much higher among white, married, older, and less educated citizens. Women who opposed the ERA tended to fit characteristics consistent with the Religious Right. In 1983, Val Burris said that high-income men opposed the amendm</div>
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<center><a href="http://prostate.ru.com/LJcdF52MoQAjs5vfGLrGcV89YSA1kPvUC6o6jWbDQfhUYIo" http:="" microsoft.com="" rel="sponsored" target="blank"><img http:="" microsoft.com="" src="http://prostate.ru.com/60182ea9d19b24c528.png" /></a></center>
<br />
<br />
<br />
</div>
</center>
</body>
</html>
--2e688641e7111f056e2bb712f4dfe9cb_29be9_9d--
