[31262] in Perl-Users-Digest
Perl-Users Digest, Issue: 2507 Volume: 11
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Tue Jul 7 00:09:44 2009
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:09:10 -0700 (PDT)
From: Perl-Users Digest <Perl-Users-Request@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU>
To: Perl-Users@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Perl-Users Digest Mon, 6 Jul 2009 Volume: 11 Number: 2507
Today's topics:
Re: FAQ 4.44 How do I test whether two arrays or hashes sln@netherlands.com
Re: formatting a number of elsif statements sln@netherlands.com
Re: HTTP::Cookies bug sln@netherlands.com
Lets do away with C/C++ and see how long it takes for t sln@netherlands.com
Re: Lets do away with C/C++ and see how long it takes f <tadmc@seesig.invalid>
Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01) (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:27:07 -0700
From: sln@netherlands.com
Subject: Re: FAQ 4.44 How do I test whether two arrays or hashes are equal?
Message-Id: <2v8555plbhi96cssale5kpiv79v6ib0247@4ax.com>
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 18:03:02 -0700, PerlFAQ Server <brian@stonehenge.com> wrote:
>This is an excerpt from the latest version perlfaq4.pod, which
>comes with the standard Perl distribution. These postings aim to
>reduce the number of repeated questions as well as allow the community
>to review and update the answers. The latest version of the complete
>perlfaq is at http://faq.perl.org .
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>4.44: How do I test whether two arrays or hashes are equal?
>
> With Perl 5.10 and later, the smart match operator can give you the
> answer with the least amount of work:
>
> use 5.010;
>
> if( @array1 ~~ @array2 )
> {
> say "The arrays are the same";
> }
>
> if( %hash1 ~~ %hash2 ) # doesn't check values!
> {
> say "The hash keys are the same";
> }
>
Well, this is dumb, where's the less than 5.10 ~~ operator?
Where's the !~~ operator? What version?
This FAQ should be canned, its utter BS, like all the FAQ's.
-sln
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:52:50 -0700
From: sln@netherlands.com
Subject: Re: formatting a number of elsif statements
Message-Id: <6pv455lc6qrq6pbm9rlnin5pvtjshaqfee@4ax.com>
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:27:17 -0700, sln@netherlands.com wrote:
>On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 14:03:06 -0700 (PDT), ccc31807 <cartercc@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Jul 6, 3:55 pm, s...@netherlands.com wrote:
>So there you have it, jump relative (with conditional) or jump absolute.
Iiether can be conditional (relative or absolute).
I just never found the TABLE op code, u know. Assemblers have indirection
with locations, but the raw code is jumps, assemblers just embelish and translate
to simple op jumps. There is no construct more complex to the cpu no matter what
you think.
This is a prime example of learning before leaping.
-sln
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:12:13 -0700
From: sln@netherlands.com
Subject: Re: HTTP::Cookies bug
Message-Id: <hjt4555vcabge0h9gjodvanu6j3ndlai60@4ax.com>
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 15:08:35 -0700 (PDT), Russ in San Diego <russgoog@gmail.com> wrote:
>Does anyone know whether someone is maintaining HTTP::Cookies? I'm
>pretty sure I've found a bug, and have a tentative fix for it. I
>tried emailing the person who is listed as the maintainer (Gisle Aas)
>at his ActiveState.com email address, but I never received a
>response.
Contact the CPAN folks if enough time has passed.
Not every maintainer is still alive, as are not the maintaining, lol.
-sln
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 18:40:50 -0700
From: sln@netherlands.com
Subject: Lets do away with C/C++ and see how long it takes for the world economy to collapse ~ 1 nano second
Message-Id: <fo95555gb7gie7nto2n4krs6qddht9sjn5@4ax.com>
I'm just fed up with all the bullshit on this site about higher
languages like Perl.
Lets just call GOD what it is .. C/C++
-sln
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:28:49 -0500
From: Tad J McClellan <tadmc@seesig.invalid>
Subject: Re: Lets do away with C/C++ and see how long it takes for the world economy to collapse ~ 1 nano second
Message-Id: <slrnh55fvt.g2l.tadmc@tadmc30.sbcglobal.net>
sln@netherlands.com <sln@netherlands.com> wrote:
> I'm just fed up with all the bullshit on this site
This is not a "site".
--
Tad McClellan
email: perl -le "print scalar reverse qq/moc.noitatibaher\100cmdat/"
------------------------------
Date: 6 Apr 2001 21:33:47 GMT (Last modified)
From: Perl-Users-Request@ruby.oce.orst.edu (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
Subject: Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01)
Message-Id: <null>
Administrivia:
#The Perl-Users Digest is a retransmission of the USENET newsgroup
#comp.lang.perl.misc. For subscription or unsubscription requests, send
#the single line:
#
# subscribe perl-users
#or:
# unsubscribe perl-users
#
#to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu.
NOTE: due to the current flood of worm email banging on ruby, the smtp
server on ruby has been shut off until further notice.
To submit articles to comp.lang.perl.announce, send your article to
clpa@perl.com.
#To request back copies (available for a week or so), send your request
#to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu with the command "send perl-users x.y",
#where x is the volume number and y is the issue number.
#For other requests pertaining to the digest, send mail to
#perl-users-request@ruby.oce.orst.edu. Do not waste your time or mine
#sending perl questions to the -request address, I don't have time to
#answer them even if I did know the answer.
------------------------------
End of Perl-Users Digest V11 Issue 2507
***************************************
