[30109] in Perl-Users-Digest
Perl-Users Digest, Issue: 1352 Volume: 11
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Tue Mar 11 00:09:43 2008
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:09:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Perl-Users Digest <Perl-Users-Request@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU>
To: Perl-Users@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Perl-Users Digest Mon, 10 Mar 2008 Volume: 11 Number: 1352
Today's topics:
Re: Pattern extraction <tadmc@seesig.invalid>
Regex newbie <garyhoran@gmail.com>
Re: regexp for s/// <usenet@davidfilmer.com>
Re: regexp for s/// <abigail@abigail.be>
Re: regexp for s/// <devnull4711@web.de>
regular expression with split goes wrong ? <jh3ang@gmail.com>
Re: regular expression with split goes wrong ? <joost@zeekat.nl>
Re: regular expression with split goes wrong ? <peter@makholm.net>
Re: regular expression with split goes wrong ? <riad.kaced@gmail.com>
Re: Setting chmod <abigail@abigail.be>
Re: Setting chmod <joost@zeekat.nl>
text substitution question <pauls@nospam.off>
Re: text substitution question <riad.kaced@gmail.com>
Re: text substitution question <john@castleamber.com>
Re: text substitution question <jurgenex@hotmail.com>
Re: The people in comp.lang.perl.misc said... (Ralph Kramden)
Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01) (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 05:46:18 -0500
From: Tad J McClellan <tadmc@seesig.invalid>
Subject: Re: Pattern extraction
Message-Id: <slrnfta4bq.82l.tadmc@tadmc30.sbcglobal.net>
Deepan - M.Sc(SE) - 03MW06 <deepan.17@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am having a string like below:
>
> $str="/a/b/c/"; (or) $str = "/a/b/c/d/";
>
> What i need is that i should always be able to extract "c" from the
> above strings. I should not use split.
Why not?
--
Tad McClellan
email: perl -le "print scalar reverse qq/moc.noitatibaher\100cmdat/"
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 20:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: gazza67 <garyhoran@gmail.com>
Subject: Regex newbie
Message-Id: <233762b6-ab19-45d1-902f-97e5af5d5b61@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
Anybody,
I want to use a regex in which the string for which we are searching
is a variable. Is this possible - it doesnt seem to work for me.
$a = "be";
$b="to be or not to be";
if ($b =~ m/$a/i )
print "this should be true";
$b = "apples and oranges";
if ($b =~ m/$a/i )
print "this should be false";
Cheers
Gary
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:59:19 -0800
From: David Filmer <usenet@davidfilmer.com>
Subject: Re: regexp for s///
Message-Id: <UaudnWybbbBiM0jaRVn_vwA@giganews.com>
Abigail wrote:
> give ($string) {
> when ("A: aaa B: bbb") {
Is that Perl6?
------------------------------
Date: 10 Mar 2008 22:23:27 GMT
From: Abigail <abigail@abigail.be>
Subject: Re: regexp for s///
Message-Id: <slrnftbd6u.ec.abigail@alexandra.abigail.be>
_
David Filmer (usenet@davidfilmer.com) wrote on VCCCV September MCMXCIII
in <URL:news:UaudnWybbbBiM0jaRVn_vwA@giganews.com>:
?? Abigail wrote:
??
?? > give ($string) {
?? > when ("A: aaa B: bbb") {
??
?? Is that Perl6?
I've no idea whether that works in Perl6. I don't care about Perl6.
But I'm sure it's Perl5. Assuming you have a recent version of Perl5.
Abigail
--
A perl rose: perl -e '@}>-`-,-`-%-'
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:40:51 +0100
From: Frank Seitz <devnull4711@web.de>
Subject: Re: regexp for s///
Message-Id: <63lrnlF27srifU5@mid.individual.net>
David Filmer wrote:
> Abigail wrote:
>>
>> give ($string) {
>> when ("A: aaa B: bbb") {
>
> Is that Perl6?
It's Perl 5.10 with "use feature 'switch'".
Frank
--
Dipl.-Inform. Frank Seitz; http://www.fseitz.de/
Anwendungen für Ihr Internet und Intranet
Tel: 04103/180301; Fax: -02; Industriestr. 31, 22880 Wedel
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:44:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: jh3an <jh3ang@gmail.com>
Subject: regular expression with split goes wrong ?
Message-Id: <b89b2004-cd14-4cb8-8f6c-53e15e501400@c33g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
Here is mysterious code, please look:
$x = '12aba34ba5';
@num = split /(a|b)+/, $x;
now, @num has ('12','a','34','a','5').
I don't understand.
I was expecting that @num would have '12','34','5'.
However, it is not.
Why..? Please help me.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:48:59 +0100
From: Joost Diepenmaat <joost@zeekat.nl>
Subject: Re: regular expression with split goes wrong ?
Message-Id: <87ejaiz1v8.fsf@zeekat.nl>
jh3an <jh3ang@gmail.com> writes:
> Here is mysterious code, please look:
>
> $x = '12aba34ba5';
> @num = split /(a|b)+/, $x;
>
> now, @num has ('12','a','34','a','5').
>
> I don't understand.
> I was expecting that @num would have '12','34','5'.
> However, it is not.
See perldoc -f split:
If the PATTERN contains parentheses, additional list elements
are created from each matching substring in the delimiter.
split(/([,-])/, "1-10,20", 3);
produces the list value
(1, '-', 10, ',', 20)
IOW, you can use some non-capturing syntax, like:
@num = split /[ab]+/,$x;
to discard the separators.
--
Joost Diepenmaat | blog: http://joost.zeekat.nl/ | work: http://zeekat.nl/
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:52:37 +0000
From: Peter Makholm <peter@makholm.net>
Subject: Re: regular expression with split goes wrong ?
Message-Id: <87ve3uw8ka.fsf@hacking.dk>
jh3an <jh3ang@gmail.com> writes:
> Why..? Please help me.
Read 'perldoc -f split'.
[...]
If the PATTERN contains parentheses, additional list elements
are created from each matching substring in the delimiter.
split(/([,-])/, "1-10,20", 3);
produces the list value
(1, '-', 10, ',', 20)
[...]
//Makholm
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 18:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Riad KACED <riad.kaced@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: regular expression with split goes wrong ?
Message-Id: <2e65c757-6a66-4edd-94de-e58afb20d6d8@u69g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
I would propose the following for your case :
@num = split /D+/,$x;
This will split with any a-zA-Z
Riad.
------------------------------
Date: 10 Mar 2008 21:20:09 GMT
From: Abigail <abigail@abigail.be>
Subject: Re: Setting chmod
Message-Id: <slrnftb9g9.ec.abigail@alexandra.abigail.be>
_
Joost Diepenmaat (joost@zeekat.nl) wrote on VCCCV September MCMXCIII in
<URL:news:873aqy4bty.fsf@zeekat.nl>:
`` Abigail <abigail@abigail.be> writes:
`` > Well, if someone else unlinks, overwrites or moves the file, the program
`` > most likely doesn't do what you expect, regardless whether this happens
`` > before, or after the chmod. And your program doesn't magically do what
`` > you expect under such conditions if you use sysopen.
``
`` You're right, of course. It's just one of the things to
`` consider. Another is that in this case, the file is supposed to be
`` unreadable for anyone but the user writing it, but using
`` chmod($filename) after an open() leaves a short time window during which
`` someone else could possibly open the file for reading (or maybe even
`` read+write), which would give them access to the contents of the file as
`` long as they keep the handle.
Well, this may, or may not be the case.
`` Just saying, /if/ you need to specify restrictive permissions, you
`` probably want to do that it reliably as possible.
OTOH, there are many situations where it doesn't matter. I regularly
open a file with open(), and set its mode afterwards (typically after
closing it), without it being a problem.
I really, really dislike the attitude of many Perl people to respond
to question with suggestions of changing the code that have nothing
at all to do with the question; and all for hypothetical situations
which may not at all be relevant for the OP. To make matter worse,
those hypothetical are usually only revealed after someone asks the
reasons behind the suggestion.
Abigail
--
perl -we '$@="\145\143\150\157\040\042\112\165\163\164\040\141\156\157\164".
"\150\145\162\040\120\145\162\154\040\110\141\143\153\145\162".
"\042\040\076\040\057\144\145\166\057\164\164\171";`$@`'
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 22:42:13 +0100
From: Joost Diepenmaat <joost@zeekat.nl>
Subject: Re: Setting chmod
Message-Id: <87iqzuz26i.fsf@zeekat.nl>
Abigail <abigail@abigail.be> writes:
> I really, really dislike the attitude of many Perl people to respond
> to question with suggestions of changing the code that have nothing
> at all to do with the question; and all for hypothetical situations
> which may not at all be relevant for the OP. To make matter worse,
> those hypothetical are usually only revealed after someone asks the
> reasons behind the suggestion.
Which is why I said that "John"'s code would work "almost everytime" and
provided examples of some situations were it wouldn't. Since the poster
indicated he's new to perl he might also be new to these kinds of
potential problems.
I do appreciate you calling me on the above post, by the way: it made me
think a bit harder about the security implications of the race
condition.
--
Joost Diepenmaat | blog: http://joost.zeekat.nl/ | work: http://zeekat.nl/
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:14:19 -0700
From: pauls <pauls@nospam.off>
Subject: text substitution question
Message-Id: <JJidnb5ad-ZsU0janZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@seanet.com>
I am trying to figure-out how to eliminate any occurrences of the
following text:
</font>
in a text file.
Usually I try to do some operation on the input file $_ like this:
s/</font>//g;
But, this does not eliminate the text.
Any help appreciated!
Thanks!
P.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Riad KACED <riad.kaced@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: text substitution question
Message-Id: <2376260c-34d9-4b03-9b89-16f5d640d58d@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Hi Paul,
You need to protect the / in /font.
Try something like : s/<\/font>//g;
That's the simple way I see in your case. If you have patterns with a
lot of slashes, It is worth to change the separator.
If for example you want to match a web address, you could write :
m/http:\/\/\w+/(\w+\/)*\w\.html/
But I prefer :
m=http://\w+/(\w+/)*\w\.html= # = as a separator, this is an example !
Hope it helps !
Riad.
------------------------------
Date: 11 Mar 2008 02:02:51 GMT
From: John Bokma <john@castleamber.com>
Subject: Re: text substitution question
Message-Id: <Xns9A5DCBF0E6AC1castleamber@130.133.1.4>
pauls <pauls@nospam.off> wrote:
> Usually I try to do some operation on the input file $_ like this:
>
> s/</font>//g;
>
> But, this does not eliminate the text.
You probably got an error, next time *always* include the exact error.
One solution:
s{</font>}{}g;
--
John
http://johnbokma.com/
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 03:31:06 GMT
From: Jürgen Exner <jurgenex@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: text substitution question
Message-Id: <unubt31r0882ksntv7s0up6id7kn0jf9tp@4ax.com>
pauls <pauls@nospam.off> wrote:
>s/</font>//g;
>But, this does not eliminate the text.
>Any help appreciated!
If you had used strict and warnings then perl would have helped you already:
Useless use of division (/) in void context at t.pl line 2.
Bareword "g" not allowed while "strict subs" in use at t.pl line 2.
t.pl had compilation errors.
Now, why would perl believe there is a division in that line? Maybe because
there is a surplus slash aka division sign? I am counting 4 where there
should be only three.
Simple solution: use a different seperator for the s command, e.g.
s+</font>++g;
And PLEASE enable strictures and warnings.
jue
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:32:57 GMT
From: Ralph_Kramden@bigfoot.com (Ralph Kramden)
Subject: Re: The people in comp.lang.perl.misc said...
Message-Id: <47d5c439.25965703@news.newsguy.com>
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 02:58:38 -0600, <2ut9t3t5phq6hd4njgm81peja5dk45jjf5@4ax.com>,
Caduceus (who is really convicted felon Steven Craig Horn) <kcom@fusemail.com> wrote:
>....that they hate skrewdriver.
I'd imagine they don't like scumbags like you either who make death threats to women
and their young children as well as to law enforcement officials and a judge; all of
which you did and were convicted for and now on bond and awaiting sentencing on
March 19, 2008.
http://www.oscn.net/applications/ocisweb/GetCaseInformation.asp?submitted=true&viewtype=caseGeneral&casemasterID=2133794&db=Oklahoma
IN THE DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
STATE OF OKLAHOMA,
Plaintiff,
v.
STEVEN CRAIG HORN,
Defendant. No. CF-2007-864
(Criminal Felony)
Filed: 02/13/2007
Judge: Elliott, Ray C.
Parties
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HORN, STEVEN CRAIG , Defendant
Spencer Police Department , ARRESTING AGENCY
STATE OF OKLAHOMA , Plaintiff
Attorneys
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attorney Represented Parties
Gile, Merle(Bar # )
120 N. ROBINSON
STE 2900
OKC,, OK 73102 HORN, STEVEN CRAIG
Events
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monday, January 28, 2008 at 9:00 AM
JURY TRIAL (ISSUE)(JTI) HORN, STEVEN CRAIG Ray C. Elliott
Wednesday, March 19, 2008 at 13:30 PM
SENTENCING (AFTER BLIND PLEA)(SEN) HORN, STEVEN CRAIG Ray C. Elliott
Counts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parties appear only under the counts with which they were charged. For complete
sentence information, see the court minute on the docket.
Count # 1.
Count as Filed: COMPU, USING A COMPUTER, COMPUTER NETWORK, OR COMPUTER SYSTEM TO
PUT ANOTHER PERSON IN FEAR OF PHYSICAL HARM OR DEATH , in violation of 21 O.S.
1951-1981 Date Of Offense: 10/08/2006
Party Name: Disposition Information:
Defendant: HORN, STEVEN CRAIG
Pending.
Count # 2.
Count as Filed: COMPU, USING A COMPUTER, COMPUTER NETWORK, OR COMPUTER SYSTEM TO PUT
ANOTHER PERSON IN FEAR OF PHYSICAL HARM OR DEATH , in violation of 21 O.S. 1951-1981
Date Of Offense: 10/13/2006
Party Name: Disposition Information:
Defendant: HORN, STEVEN CRAIG
Pending.
Count # 3.
Count as Filed: TELE, MAKING A HARASSING TELEPHONE CALL , in violation of 21 O.S.
1172
Date Of Offense: 11/02/2006
Party Name: Disposition Information:
Defendant: HORN, STEVEN CRAIG
Pending.
Defendant Steven "Caduceus" Horn was convicted of two violations of 21 O.S. 1951-1981
and one violation of: 21 O.S. 1172 (as detailed in a court document below). The
penalties for violating the two Oklahoma State Statutes may be found at this link:
http://www.lsb.state.ok.us/OKStatutes/CompleteTitles/os21.rtf
From the above link:
§21-1951. Short title.
This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Oklahoma Computer Crimes Act".
Added by Laws 1984, c. 70, § 1, emerg. eff. March 29, 1984.
Added by Laws 1984, ch. 70, § 2, emerg. eff. March 29, 1984. Amended by Laws 1989, c.
151, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1989.
§21-1953. Prohibited acts.
A. It shall be unlawful to:
8. Willfully use a computer, computer system, or computer network to annoy, abuse,
threaten, or harass another person; and
9. Willfully use a computer, computer system, or computer network to put another
person in fear of physical harm or death.
B. Any person convicted of violating paragraph 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 or 9 of subsection A of
this section shall be guilty of a felony punishable as provided in Section 1955 of
this title.
C. Any person convicted of violating paragraph 4, 5 or 8 of subsection A of this
section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
§21-1955. Penalties - Civil actions.
A. Upon conviction of a felony under the provisions of the Oklahoma Computer Crimes
Act, punishment shall be by a fine of not less than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00)
and not more than One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00), or by confinement in
the State Penitentiary for a term of not more than ten (10) years, or by both such
fine and imprisonment.
(That is up to twenty years in prison and/or $200,000.00 fine for your two counts.)
§21-1172. Obscene, threatening or harassing telecommunication or other electronic
communications - Penalty.
A. It shall be unlawful for a person who, by means of a telecommunication or other
electronic communication device, willfully either:
1. Makes any comment, request, suggestion, or proposal which is obscene, lewd,
lascivious, filthy, or indecent;
2. Makes a telecommunication or other electronic communication with intent to
terrify, intimidate or harass, or threaten to inflict injury or physical harm to any
person or property of that person;
3. Makes a telecommunication or other electronic communication, whether or not
conversation ensues, with intent to put the party called in fear of physical harm or
death;
4. Makes a telecommunication or other electronic communication, whether or not
conversation ensues, without disclosing the identity of the person making the call or
communication and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person at
the called number;
5. Knowingly permits any telecommunication or other electronic communication under
the control of the person to be used for any purpose prohibited by this section; and
6. In conspiracy or concerted action with other persons, makes repeated calls or
electronic communications or simultaneous calls or electronic communications solely
to harass any person at the called number(s).
B. As used in this section, "telecommunication" and "electronic communication" mean
any type of telephonic, electronic or radio communications, or transmission of signs,
signals, data, writings, images and sounds or intelligence of any nature by
telephone, including cellular telephones, wire, cable, radio, electromagnetic,
photoelectronic or photo-optical system or the creation, display, management,
storage, processing, transmission or distribution of images, text, voice, video or
data by wire, cable or wireless means, including the Internet. The term includes:
1. A communication initiated by electronic mail, instant message, network call, or
facsimile machine; and
2. A communication made to a pager.
C. Use of a telephone or other electronic communications facility under this section
shall include all use made of such a facility between the points of origin and
reception. Any offense under this section is a continuing offense and shall be
deemed to have been committed at either the place of origin or the place of
reception.
D. Except as provided in subsection E of this section, any person who is convicted
of the provisions of subsection A of this section, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
E. Any person who is convicted of a second offense under this section shall be
guilty of a felony.
Added by Laws 1969, c. 233, § 1, emerg. eff. April 21, 1969. Amended by Laws 1986,
c. 215, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1986; Laws 1993,
c. 283, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1993; Laws 1997, c. 133, § 306, eff. July 1, 1999; Laws
2004, c. 275, § 5, eff. July 1, 2004; Laws
2005, c. 231, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 2005.
NOTE: Laws 1998, 1st Ex. Sess., c. 2, § 23 amended the effective date of Laws 1997,
c. 133, § 306 from July 1, 1998, to
July 1, 1999.
Docket
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Code Count Party Serial # Entry Date
01-10-2007 AF/SW - HORN, STEVEN CRAIG 51701020 Aug 16 2007 10:05:47:137AM
AFFIDAVIT AND RETURN OF SEARCH WARRANT/SW-7-11
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
11-21-2007 CTFREE - HORN, STEVEN CRAIG 52638024 Nov 27 2007 9:53:37:953AM
ELLIOTT: COMES ON FOR PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. DEFT APPEARS IN PERSON WITH COUNSEL MERLE
GILE. STATE PRESENT BY ADA SAM CHAVERS. CASE SET FOR JURY TRIAL ON 1/28/2008 @ 9:00
AM BEFORE JUDGE ELLIOTT.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
12-03-2007 RTSBN - HORN, STEVEN CRAIG 52707391 Dec 4 2007 3:46:06:720PM
RETURN SUBPOENA (NO CHARGE)X4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
01-09-2008 NO - HORN, STEVEN CRAIG 52995134 Jan 14 2008 5:10:06:730PM
NOTICE OF OPEN FILE AND MOTION FOR DISCOVERY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
01-28-2008 CTFREE - HORN, STEVEN CRAIG 53113784 Jan 28 2008 9:21:38:490AM
ELLIOTT: COMES ON FOR JURY TRIAL. DEFT APPEARS IN PERSON OUT OF CUSTODY WITH COUNSEL
MERLE GILE. STATE PRESENT BY ADA SAM CHAVERS.
DEFT ENTERS A BLIND PLEA OF GUILTY.
FORMAL SENTENCING SET 3/19/2008 @ 1:30 PM
BEFORE JUDGE ELLIOTT. PSI ORDERED. BONDSMAN AGREES TO STAY ON BOND.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CONVICT STEVE HORN'S CRIMINAL HISTORY
http://www.mwcsun.com/local/local_story_050094629.html
Published: February 19, 2007 09:46 am
40-gun cache
Man arrested for alleged threats against woman’s children
By Eric Bradshaw, staff writer
The Sunday Sun
An Oklahoma City man accused of threatening to shoot a woman’s children
was arrested Thursday just after midnight at his home.
Spencer Police filed charges Tuesday against Steven Craig Horn, 46, for
allegedly making death threats against an area woman and her children by
e-mail and for making a harassing phone call. Horn was charged with two
counts of using a computer to put another person in fear of harm or death
and one count of making harassing phone calls.
According to court records, Horn allegedly wrote in one e-mail, "What
you did between (a woman Horn claims is a former girlfriend) and I means
that you can kiss your two sons good-bye. Remember I’m GOD. I decide who
lives and who dies and your two boys die."
In another, he is alleged to have written, "Remember I have a .45 automatic
and can take your b.....d sons out."
Spencer Det. Olan Boydston said he received information from Oklahoma City
Police that Horn called them on July 7 threatening to kill himself and
requesting to be put in protective custody. He had been self-medicating with
Valium and alcohol, Boydston reported.
Boydston’s report said Oklahoma City Police confiscated 21 firearms from
Horn at the time, but later returned them. They had been investigating a
threatening call Horn allegedly made to Garland, Texas Police. Horn allegedly
threatened to "shoot the judge and the pig cop that gave her (his former
girlfriend) a ticket."
Boydston received an anonymous call traced to Horn’s phone after he interviewed
the man, the police report said. "I am God, and I also still have my Ruger P-90
and it has a bullet with your name on it," Horn reportedly told him.
A cache of 40 firearms was confiscated from Horn’s home along with a computer
with images of young girls.
Horn’s father said his son was mentally unstable and a potential danger to himself
and others.
------------------------------
Date: 6 Apr 2001 21:33:47 GMT (Last modified)
From: Perl-Users-Request@ruby.oce.orst.edu (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
Subject: Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01)
Message-Id: <null>
Administrivia:
#The Perl-Users Digest is a retransmission of the USENET newsgroup
#comp.lang.perl.misc. For subscription or unsubscription requests, send
#the single line:
#
# subscribe perl-users
#or:
# unsubscribe perl-users
#
#to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu.
NOTE: due to the current flood of worm email banging on ruby, the smtp
server on ruby has been shut off until further notice.
To submit articles to comp.lang.perl.announce, send your article to
clpa@perl.com.
#To request back copies (available for a week or so), send your request
#to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu with the command "send perl-users x.y",
#where x is the volume number and y is the issue number.
#For other requests pertaining to the digest, send mail to
#perl-users-request@ruby.oce.orst.edu. Do not waste your time or mine
#sending perl questions to the -request address, I don't have time to
#answer them even if I did know the answer.
------------------------------
End of Perl-Users Digest V11 Issue 1352
***************************************
