[27296] in Perl-Users-Digest
Perl-Users Digest, Issue: 9040 Volume: 10
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Fri Mar 10 14:05:56 2006
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:05:05 -0800 (PST)
From: Perl-Users Digest <Perl-Users-Request@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU>
To: Perl-Users@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Perl-Users Digest Fri, 10 Mar 2006 Volume: 10 Number: 9040
Today's topics:
Re: A Problem With GD <markem@airmail.net>
Re: A Problem With GD <markem@airmail.net>
Re: A Problem With GD <xx087@freenet.carleton.ca>
Re: export a variable from a module <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim>
Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revisi <1700-820@onlinehome.de>
Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revisi <rm@biteme.org>
Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01) (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:03:15 -0600
From: Mark Manning <markem@airmail.net>
Subject: Re: A Problem With GD
Message-Id: <12138nrqf41nm02@corp.supernews.com>
Dave Weaver wrote:
> Finally, some Perl content in this thread!
>
> Mark Manning <markem@airmail.net> wrote:
>
>> Is
>>
>> for( $i=0; $i<10; $i++ )...
>>
>> any better than
>>
>> $i=-1;
>> while( $i++ < 10 )...
>>
>> any worse?
>
>
> They don't do the same thing.
You are correct! :-) So much for fast examples! :-)
>
>
>>Which is correct?
>
>
> It depends whether you want to count from 0..9 or 0..10
>
> The best way is
>
> for my $i (0 .. 9) { # or (0..10), depending...
> ...
> }
>
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 10:04:35 -0600
From: Mark Manning <markem@airmail.net>
Subject: Re: A Problem With GD
Message-Id: <12138qbjp6gd850@corp.supernews.com>
Matt Garrish wrote:
> Oh please, you're still a half-wit, as evidenced throughout this thread. I
> mistook this post for the new troll, that's all.
>
> Matt
Ah I see. There is nothing like an old troll and nothing is quite as stinky eh?
:-)
------------------------------
Date: 10 Mar 2006 17:57:21 GMT
From: Glenn Jackman <xx087@freenet.carleton.ca>
Subject: Re: A Problem With GD
Message-Id: <slrne13fg1.fhh.xx087@smeagol.ncf.ca>
At 2006-03-08 04:48AM, Dave Weaver <zen13097@zen.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Finally, some Perl content in this thread!
>
> Mark Manning <markem@airmail.net> wrote:
> > Is
> > for( $i=0; $i<10; $i++ )...
> > any better than
> > $i=-1;
> > while( $i++ < 10 )...
> > any worse?
>
> They don't do the same thing.
However,
$i = -1
while (++$i < 10) {...
does.
--
Glenn Jackman
Ulterior Designer
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:23:58 +0000
From: bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim>
Subject: Re: export a variable from a module
Message-Id: <44118bfe$0$6970$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net>
Anno Siegel wrote:
> bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote in comp.lang.perl.misc:
>
>>A. , Unur wrote:
>>
>>>bugbear <bugbear@trim_papermule.co.uk_trim> wrote in news:44116290$0$70329
>>>$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net:
>
>
>>I'm having no trouble at all exporting
>>functions - it's variables that are stumping
>>me.
>
>
> Then show your code already. There is *no* difference between exporting
> functions and package variables (you can't export lexicals). What *is*
> the big problem?
The magic word "our" had escaped me - see other part of thread.
I was exporting a "my" variable (or more to the point, trying to)
and everything succeeded, except that the "picked up"
variable was undefined.
BugBear
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 15:53:40 +0100
From: Josef =?UTF-8?B?TcO2bGxlcnM=?= <1700-820@onlinehome.de>
Subject: Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revision: 1.5 $)
Message-Id: <dus3tk$t3f$1@online.de>
Anno Siegel wrote:
> Ronald Matthews <rm@biteme.org> wrote in comp.lang.perl.misc:
>> tadmc@augustmail.com trolled:
>
>> You're an anal...
>
> Coming from a person whose stereotype phantasy is shitting on people's
> faces and grinding it in with their boots, that isn't entirely convincing.
> Can you say "projection"?
Anoo, for god's sake, DON'T FEED THE TROLL!!!
--
josef punkt moellers bei gmx punkt de
------------------------------
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:59:31 GMT
From: Ronald Matthews <rm@biteme.org>
Subject: Re: Posting Guidelines for comp.lang.perl.misc ($Revision: 1.5 $)
Message-Id: <78jQf.34980$Qh1.191955@news20.bellglobal.com>
Anno Siegel <anno4000@lublin.zrz.tu-berlin.de> trolled:
> Ronald Matthews <rm@biteme.org> wrote in comp.lang.perl.misc:
> > tadmc@augustmail.com trolled:
> > You're an anal...
> Coming from a person whose stereotype phantasy is shitting on
> people's faces and grinding it in with their boots, that isn't
> entirely convincing. Can you say "projection"?
> Anno
Would the male version of Anno be Anus?
cordially, as always,
rm
------------------------------
Date: 6 Apr 2001 21:33:47 GMT (Last modified)
From: Perl-Users-Request@ruby.oce.orst.edu (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
Subject: Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01)
Message-Id: <null>
Administrivia:
#The Perl-Users Digest is a retransmission of the USENET newsgroup
#comp.lang.perl.misc. For subscription or unsubscription requests, send
#the single line:
#
# subscribe perl-users
#or:
# unsubscribe perl-users
#
#to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu.
NOTE: due to the current flood of worm email banging on ruby, the smtp
server on ruby has been shut off until further notice.
To submit articles to comp.lang.perl.announce, send your article to
clpa@perl.com.
#To request back copies (available for a week or so), send your request
#to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu with the command "send perl-users x.y",
#where x is the volume number and y is the issue number.
#For other requests pertaining to the digest, send mail to
#perl-users-request@ruby.oce.orst.edu. Do not waste your time or mine
#sending perl questions to the -request address, I don't have time to
#answer them even if I did know the answer.
------------------------------
End of Perl-Users Digest V10 Issue 9040
***************************************
