[25799] in Perl-Users-Digest
Perl-Users Digest, Issue: 8038 Volume: 10
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Sun May 1 18:05:16 2005
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 15:05:06 -0700 (PDT)
From: Perl-Users Digest <Perl-Users-Request@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU>
To: Perl-Users@ruby.OCE.ORST.EDU (Perl-Users Digest)
Perl-Users Digest Sun, 1 May 2005 Volume: 10 Number: 8038
Today's topics:
Re: Date::Calc::Add_Delta_YM() undefined <bigj@kamelfreund.de>
Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working <hackeras@gmail.com>
Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working <1usa@llenroc.ude.invalid>
Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working <hackeras@gmail.com>
Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working <pilkowsk@informatik.uni-marburg.de>
Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working (Anno Siegel)
Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working <hackeras@gmail.com>
Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working <hackeras@gmail.com>
Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working (Anno Siegel)
Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01) (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 22:44:46 +0200
From: Janek Schleicher <bigj@kamelfreund.de>
Subject: Re: Date::Calc::Add_Delta_YM() undefined
Message-Id: <pan.2005.05.01.20.44.43.249187@kamelfreund.de>
On Sun, 01 May 2005 03:04:58 +0000, develop wrote:
> I'm using the Date::Calc module and its subroutine Add_Delta_YM(), but the
> PERL debugger is telling me that Add_Delta_YM() is an undefined
> subroutine. I have version 4.3 of the module.
>
> In its discussion of Add_Delta_YM() versus Add_Delta_YMD(), the
> documentation at:
> http://cpan.uwinnipeg.ca/htdocs/Date-Calc/Date/Calc.html says that
> Add_Delta_YM() is a new subroutine. Is the version of the module installed
> on my Unix box, version 4.3, the latest version, or is it older than the
> documentation I found on the web?
Well, in the CHANGES.txt file of the current version 5.4 you can find
Version 5.0 10.10.2001
Module "Date::Calc":
+ Added the following new functions:
* check_time()
* Delta_YMD()
* Delta_YMDHMS()
* Add_Delta_YM()
* Add_Delta_YMDHMS()
* Normalize_DHMS()
...
That means that your version 4.3 is still to old and you should update
your Date::Calc module (at least to version 5.0) as Fabian also has
already suggested.
Greetings,
Janek
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 22:25:09 +0300
From: Nikos <hackeras@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working
Message-Id: <d53aej$glo$1@nic.grnet.gr>
A. Sinan Unur wrote:
> Nikos <hackeras@gmail.com> wrote in news:d5345j$bg3$2@nic.grnet.gr:
>
>
>>A. Sinan Unur wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>This can be done also liek you said but that would require the use of
>>>>an extra module that would have to be downloaded from CPAN.
>
>
> [ I will join those in unequivocally stating that you *are* a liar.
> I said no such thing. Those are your words, not mine. The fact that
> you choose to lie when it is so easy not to is very, very troubling.
> ]
I'am NOT a liar.
I never said you said those thing. I DID SAID THEM.
I just didnt quote correctly.
That was ALL you had to think before calling me a liar, but instead you
prefer not to.
Apart from that it wouldnt be smart to do so, even if i was aliar,
because the previous post was with my anme on it.
Just relax a little, will ya?
> Because his suggestion *will* continue to work regardless of changes in
> the representation of IP addresses in the future.
ok, i didnt knew that.
In that case Fabian suggestion is better.
--
"Of course I cant stop you. And that would really bum me out
if that were my job. But my job isnt to stop you, its to
make it as difficult as possible, for as many as possible,
for as long as possible ."
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 19:42:43 GMT
From: "A. Sinan Unur" <1usa@llenroc.ude.invalid>
Subject: Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working
Message-Id: <Xns96499FB12CFFEasu1cornelledu@127.0.0.1>
Nikos <hackeras@gmail.com> wrote in news:d53aej$glo$1@nic.grnet.gr:
> A. Sinan Unur wrote:
>> [ I will join those in unequivocally stating that you *are* a liar.
>> I said no such thing. Those are your words, not mine. The fact that
>> you choose to lie when it is so easy not to is very, very
>> troubling.
>> ]
>
> I'am NOT a liar.
http://www.google.com/search?q=define%3A+liar
> I never said you said those thing.
Your message stated that I had written something. I had not. You,
knowing that I had not made such a statement, still claimed that I had.
> I just didnt quote correctly.
Now, this was not the first time you had been warned about this: Quote
properly.
> That was ALL you had to think before calling me a liar,
> but instead you prefer not to.
All you have to do is think before posting a falsehood. If this had been
the first time you misattributed quotations, I would have just warned
you. However, I adhere to the principle:
Once is happenstance.
Twice is coincidence.
Thrice is enemy action.
If you insist on consistently making false statements, there is only one
name I can call you.
Why do I care? Everything you write here gets archived somewhere. If
people reading the archives 10 years from now laugh at me, I'd rather
that be for my own stupidity than yours.
Sinan
--
A. Sinan Unur <1usa@llenroc.ude.invalid>
(reverse each component and remove .invalid for email address)
comp.lang.perl.misc guidelines on the WWW:
http://mail.augustmail.com/~tadmc/clpmisc/clpmisc_guidelines.html
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 22:53:08 +0300
From: Nikos <hackeras@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working
Message-Id: <d53c31$i1f$1@nic.grnet.gr>
A. Sinan Unur wrote:
> Once is happenstance.
> Twice is coincidence.
> Thrice is enemy action.
It could be carelessness as well and it happen more than 3 times as well.
> If you insist on consistently making false statements, there is only one
> name I can call you.
It was just a mistake, whya are you making such a big deal out out of it?
> Why do I care? Everything you write here gets archived somewhere. If
> people reading the archives 10 years from now laugh at me, I'd rather
> that be for my own stupidity than yours.
Nobody will lauph to any of us since we now solves the misunderstanding.
--
"Of course I cant stop you. And that would really bum me out
if that were my job. But my job isnt to stop you, its to
make it as difficult as possible, for as many as possible,
for as long as possible ."
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 1 May 2005 22:01:27 +0200
From: Fabian Pilkowski <pilkowsk@informatik.uni-marburg.de>
Subject: Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working
Message-Id: <3dkqq6F6p7a1cU1@individual.net>
* Nikos schrieb:
>
> I'am NOT a liar.
> I never said you said those thing. I DID SAID THEM.
>
> I just didnt quote correctly.
Then, why not quoting correctly? If you do so, nothing will be ambiguous
any more. I think, it's fair to do so.
>
> That was ALL you had to think before calling me a liar, but instead you
> prefer not to.
I'm sure, Sinan had thought about that. He had told you in the past that
it would be nice to quote correctly. You have ignored him til now.
>
>> Because his suggestion *will* continue to work regardless of changes in
>> the representation of IP addresses in the future.
>
> ok, i didnt knew that.
> In that case Fabian suggestion is better.
Err, when answering to my posting you said you know about that!? I asked
if you're familiar with IPv4 and IPv6 addresses -- and you answered "Yes
iam". But if you're familiar with them you know about the changes in the
representation of IP addresses in the future. Contradictorily, you typed
"i didnt knew that" now.
I prefer not to call you a liar, but it seems you really don't know what
you're talking about ;-(
Btw, you've not to download a package named Socket from CPAN to use it.
It is already installed. It was shipped with your Perl distro.
regards,
fabian
------------------------------
Date: 1 May 2005 20:34:31 GMT
From: anno4000@lublin.zrz.tu-berlin.de (Anno Siegel)
Subject: Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working
Message-Id: <d53egn$o28$1@mamenchi.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE>
Nikos <hackeras@gmail.com> wrote in comp.lang.perl.misc:
> Anno Siegel wrote:
>
> > It appears to be your speciality to reject good advice for no good reason.
>
> The reason i stated its important, at least to me.
I know that, but your reason is *wrong*. You're jumping to conclusions.
Learn to check your assumptions.
Anno
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 23:46:34 +0300
From: Nikos <hackeras@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working
Message-Id: <d53f76$kdp$1@nic.grnet.gr>
Fabian Pilkowski wrote:
Guys i just missed a line upon deletion of extra quotes when i replied,
thats all.
I donw know all tha characteristics of IPv6 and certainly that about Socket.
--
"Of course I cant stop you. And that would really bum me out
if that were my job. But my job isnt to stop you, its to
make it as difficult as possible, for as many as possible,
for as long as possible ."
------------------------------
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 23:49:09 +0300
From: Nikos <hackeras@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working
Message-Id: <d53fc1$kdp$2@nic.grnet.gr>
Anno Siegel wrote:
> Nikos <hackeras@gmail.com> wrote in comp.lang.perl.misc:
>
>>Anno Siegel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>It appears to be your speciality to reject good advice for no good reason.
>>
>>The reason i stated its important, at least to me.
>
>
> I know that, but your reason is *wrong*.
> You're jumping to conclusions.
Yes and i must correct that because as it has been proves the code as i
had it would be good as far as IPv4 stayd alive.
> Learn to check your assumptions.
Yes, as far as they are explained to me on "why " they are better.
--
"Of course I cant stop you. And that would really bum me out
if that were my job. But my job isnt to stop you, its to
make it as difficult as possible, for as many as possible,
for as long as possible ."
------------------------------
Date: 1 May 2005 20:59:32 GMT
From: anno4000@lublin.zrz.tu-berlin.de (Anno Siegel)
Subject: Re: REMOTE_HOST aint working
Message-Id: <d53fvk$o28$2@mamenchi.zrz.TU-Berlin.DE>
Nikos <hackeras@gmail.com> wrote in comp.lang.perl.misc:
> Anno Siegel wrote:
> > Nikos <hackeras@gmail.com> wrote in comp.lang.perl.misc:
> >>Anno Siegel wrote:
[...]
> > Learn to check your assumptions.
>
> Yes, as far as they are explained to me on "why " they are better.
No. Learn to check your assumptions *before* someone else has to spell
it out for you. At that time you've already made a fool of yourself.
Anno
------------------------------
Date: 6 Apr 2001 21:33:47 GMT (Last modified)
From: Perl-Users-Request@ruby.oce.orst.edu (Perl-Users-Digest Admin)
Subject: Digest Administrivia (Last modified: 6 Apr 01)
Message-Id: <null>
Administrivia:
#The Perl-Users Digest is a retransmission of the USENET newsgroup
#comp.lang.perl.misc. For subscription or unsubscription requests, send
#the single line:
#
# subscribe perl-users
#or:
# unsubscribe perl-users
#
#to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu.
NOTE: due to the current flood of worm email banging on ruby, the smtp
server on ruby has been shut off until further notice.
To submit articles to comp.lang.perl.announce, send your article to
clpa@perl.com.
#To request back copies (available for a week or so), send your request
#to almanac@ruby.oce.orst.edu with the command "send perl-users x.y",
#where x is the volume number and y is the issue number.
#For other requests pertaining to the digest, send mail to
#perl-users-request@ruby.oce.orst.edu. Do not waste your time or mine
#sending perl questions to the -request address, I don't have time to
#answer them even if I did know the answer.
------------------------------
End of Perl-Users Digest V10 Issue 8038
***************************************
